Cargando…

Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011

OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetric outcomes in teenage pregnancies in a country with a low teenage delivery rate and comprehensive high-quality prenatal care. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based register study. SETTING: Finland. PARTICIPANTS: All nulliparous teenagers (13–15 years (n=84), 16–17 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leppälahti, Suvi, Gissler, Mika, Mentula, Maarit, Heikinheimo, Oskari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23959755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003225
_version_ 1782281843322650624
author Leppälahti, Suvi
Gissler, Mika
Mentula, Maarit
Heikinheimo, Oskari
author_facet Leppälahti, Suvi
Gissler, Mika
Mentula, Maarit
Heikinheimo, Oskari
author_sort Leppälahti, Suvi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetric outcomes in teenage pregnancies in a country with a low teenage delivery rate and comprehensive high-quality prenatal care. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based register study. SETTING: Finland. PARTICIPANTS: All nulliparous teenagers (13–15 years (n=84), 16–17 years (n=1234), 18–19 years (n=5987)) and controls (25-year-old to 29-year-old women (n=51 142)) with singleton deliveries in 2006–2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of adverse obstetric outcomes adjusted for demographic factors and clinically relevant pregnancy complications, with main focus on maternal pregnancy complications. RESULTS: Teenage mothers were more likely than controls to live in rural areas (16% (n=1168) vs 11.8% (n=6035)), smoke (36.4% (n=2661) vs 7% (n=3580)) and misuse alcohol or drugs (1.1% (n=82) vs 0.2% (n=96); p<0.001 for all). Teenagers made a good mean number of antenatal clinic visits (16.4 vs 16.5), but were more likely to have attended fewer than half of the recommended visits (3% (n=210) vs 1.4% (n=716)). Teenagers faced increased risks of several obstetric complications, for example, anaemia (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.1), proteinuria (1.8, 1.2 to 2.6), urinary tract infection (UTI; 2.9, 1.8 to 4.8), pyelonephritis (6.3, 3.8 to 10.4) and eclampsia (3.2, 1.4 to 7.3), the risks increasing with descending age for most outcomes. Elevated risks of pre-eclampsia (3.7, 1.5 to 9.0) and preterm delivery (2.5, 1.2 to 5.3) were also found among 13-year-olds to 15-year-olds. However, teenage mothers were more likely to have vaginal delivery (1.9, 1.7 to 2.0) without complications. Inadequate prenatal care among teenagers was a risk factor of eclampsia (12.6, 2.6 to 62.6), UTI (5.8, 1.7 to 19.7) and adverse neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant teenagers tended to be socioeconomically disadvantaged versus controls and faced higher risks of various pregnancy complications. Special attention should be paid to enrolling teenagers into adequate prenatal care in early pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3753503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37535032013-08-28 Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011 Leppälahti, Suvi Gissler, Mika Mentula, Maarit Heikinheimo, Oskari BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetric outcomes in teenage pregnancies in a country with a low teenage delivery rate and comprehensive high-quality prenatal care. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based register study. SETTING: Finland. PARTICIPANTS: All nulliparous teenagers (13–15 years (n=84), 16–17 years (n=1234), 18–19 years (n=5987)) and controls (25-year-old to 29-year-old women (n=51 142)) with singleton deliveries in 2006–2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of adverse obstetric outcomes adjusted for demographic factors and clinically relevant pregnancy complications, with main focus on maternal pregnancy complications. RESULTS: Teenage mothers were more likely than controls to live in rural areas (16% (n=1168) vs 11.8% (n=6035)), smoke (36.4% (n=2661) vs 7% (n=3580)) and misuse alcohol or drugs (1.1% (n=82) vs 0.2% (n=96); p<0.001 for all). Teenagers made a good mean number of antenatal clinic visits (16.4 vs 16.5), but were more likely to have attended fewer than half of the recommended visits (3% (n=210) vs 1.4% (n=716)). Teenagers faced increased risks of several obstetric complications, for example, anaemia (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.1), proteinuria (1.8, 1.2 to 2.6), urinary tract infection (UTI; 2.9, 1.8 to 4.8), pyelonephritis (6.3, 3.8 to 10.4) and eclampsia (3.2, 1.4 to 7.3), the risks increasing with descending age for most outcomes. Elevated risks of pre-eclampsia (3.7, 1.5 to 9.0) and preterm delivery (2.5, 1.2 to 5.3) were also found among 13-year-olds to 15-year-olds. However, teenage mothers were more likely to have vaginal delivery (1.9, 1.7 to 2.0) without complications. Inadequate prenatal care among teenagers was a risk factor of eclampsia (12.6, 2.6 to 62.6), UTI (5.8, 1.7 to 19.7) and adverse neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant teenagers tended to be socioeconomically disadvantaged versus controls and faced higher risks of various pregnancy complications. Special attention should be paid to enrolling teenagers into adequate prenatal care in early pregnancy. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3753503/ /pubmed/23959755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003225 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Leppälahti, Suvi
Gissler, Mika
Mentula, Maarit
Heikinheimo, Oskari
Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011
title Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011
title_full Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011
title_fullStr Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011
title_full_unstemmed Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011
title_short Is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? A population-based study in Finland, from 2006 to 2011
title_sort is teenage pregnancy an obstetric risk in a welfare society? a population-based study in finland, from 2006 to 2011
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23959755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003225
work_keys_str_mv AT leppalahtisuvi isteenagepregnancyanobstetricriskinawelfaresocietyapopulationbasedstudyinfinlandfrom2006to2011
AT gisslermika isteenagepregnancyanobstetricriskinawelfaresocietyapopulationbasedstudyinfinlandfrom2006to2011
AT mentulamaarit isteenagepregnancyanobstetricriskinawelfaresocietyapopulationbasedstudyinfinlandfrom2006to2011
AT heikinheimooskari isteenagepregnancyanobstetricriskinawelfaresocietyapopulationbasedstudyinfinlandfrom2006to2011