Cargando…

Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping

One goal of computational anatomy (CA) is to develop tools to accurately segment brain structures in healthy and diseased subjects. In this paper, we examine the performance and complexity of such segmentation in the framework of the large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping (LDDMM) registratio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ceritoglu, Can, Tang, Xiaoying, Chow, Margaret, Hadjiabadi, Darian, Shah, Damish, Brown, Timothy, Burhanullah, Muhammad H., Trinh, Huong, Hsu, John T., Ament, Katarina A., Crocetti, Deana, Mori, Susumu, Mostofsky, Stewart H., Yantis, Steven, Miller, Michael I., Ratnanather, J. Tilak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00151
_version_ 1782281861273223168
author Ceritoglu, Can
Tang, Xiaoying
Chow, Margaret
Hadjiabadi, Darian
Shah, Damish
Brown, Timothy
Burhanullah, Muhammad H.
Trinh, Huong
Hsu, John T.
Ament, Katarina A.
Crocetti, Deana
Mori, Susumu
Mostofsky, Stewart H.
Yantis, Steven
Miller, Michael I.
Ratnanather, J. Tilak
author_facet Ceritoglu, Can
Tang, Xiaoying
Chow, Margaret
Hadjiabadi, Darian
Shah, Damish
Brown, Timothy
Burhanullah, Muhammad H.
Trinh, Huong
Hsu, John T.
Ament, Katarina A.
Crocetti, Deana
Mori, Susumu
Mostofsky, Stewart H.
Yantis, Steven
Miller, Michael I.
Ratnanather, J. Tilak
author_sort Ceritoglu, Can
collection PubMed
description One goal of computational anatomy (CA) is to develop tools to accurately segment brain structures in healthy and diseased subjects. In this paper, we examine the performance and complexity of such segmentation in the framework of the large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping (LDDMM) registration method with reference to atlases and parameters. First we report the application of a multi-atlas segmentation approach to define basal ganglia structures in healthy and diseased kids' brains. The segmentation accuracy of the multi-atlas approach is compared with the single atlas LDDMM implementation and two state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms—Freesurfer and FSL—by computing the overlap errors between automatic and manual segmentations of the six basal ganglia nuclei in healthy subjects as well as subjects with diseases including ADHD and Autism. The high accuracy of multi-atlas segmentation is obtained at the cost of increasing the computational complexity because of the calculations necessary between the atlases and a subject. Second, we examine the effect of parameters on total LDDMM computation time and segmentation accuracy for basal ganglia structures. Single atlas LDDMM method is used to automatically segment the structures in a population of 16 subjects using different sets of parameters. The results show that a cascade approach and using fewer time steps can reduce computational complexity as much as five times while maintaining reliable segmentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3753595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37535952013-08-28 Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping Ceritoglu, Can Tang, Xiaoying Chow, Margaret Hadjiabadi, Darian Shah, Damish Brown, Timothy Burhanullah, Muhammad H. Trinh, Huong Hsu, John T. Ament, Katarina A. Crocetti, Deana Mori, Susumu Mostofsky, Stewart H. Yantis, Steven Miller, Michael I. Ratnanather, J. Tilak Front Neurosci Neuroscience One goal of computational anatomy (CA) is to develop tools to accurately segment brain structures in healthy and diseased subjects. In this paper, we examine the performance and complexity of such segmentation in the framework of the large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping (LDDMM) registration method with reference to atlases and parameters. First we report the application of a multi-atlas segmentation approach to define basal ganglia structures in healthy and diseased kids' brains. The segmentation accuracy of the multi-atlas approach is compared with the single atlas LDDMM implementation and two state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms—Freesurfer and FSL—by computing the overlap errors between automatic and manual segmentations of the six basal ganglia nuclei in healthy subjects as well as subjects with diseases including ADHD and Autism. The high accuracy of multi-atlas segmentation is obtained at the cost of increasing the computational complexity because of the calculations necessary between the atlases and a subject. Second, we examine the effect of parameters on total LDDMM computation time and segmentation accuracy for basal ganglia structures. Single atlas LDDMM method is used to automatically segment the structures in a population of 16 subjects using different sets of parameters. The results show that a cascade approach and using fewer time steps can reduce computational complexity as much as five times while maintaining reliable segmentations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3753595/ /pubmed/23986653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00151 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ceritoglu, Tang, Chow, Hadjiabadi, Shah, Brown, Burhanullah, Trinh, Hsu, Ament, Crocetti, Mori, Mostofsky, Yantis, Miller and Ratnanather. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ceritoglu, Can
Tang, Xiaoying
Chow, Margaret
Hadjiabadi, Darian
Shah, Damish
Brown, Timothy
Burhanullah, Muhammad H.
Trinh, Huong
Hsu, John T.
Ament, Katarina A.
Crocetti, Deana
Mori, Susumu
Mostofsky, Stewart H.
Yantis, Steven
Miller, Michael I.
Ratnanather, J. Tilak
Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping
title Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping
title_full Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping
title_fullStr Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping
title_full_unstemmed Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping
title_short Computational analysis of LDDMM for brain mapping
title_sort computational analysis of lddmm for brain mapping
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00151
work_keys_str_mv AT ceritoglucan computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT tangxiaoying computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT chowmargaret computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT hadjiabadidarian computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT shahdamish computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT browntimothy computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT burhanullahmuhammadh computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT trinhhuong computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT hsujohnt computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT amentkatarinaa computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT crocettideana computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT morisusumu computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT mostofskystewarth computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT yantissteven computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT millermichaeli computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping
AT ratnanatherjtilak computationalanalysisoflddmmforbrainmapping