Cargando…

Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker

BACKGROUND: To evaluate if white matter lesions (WML) on MRI can be a potential marker for onabotulinum toxin A (Botox®) treatment success in migraine, given the limited response rate and high costs per treatment. METHODS: Retrospective data base and MRI analysis of 529 migraineurs who received Boto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bumb, Anja, Seifert, Burkhard, Wetzel, Stephan, Agosti, Reto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3755787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-377
_version_ 1782282001630363648
author Bumb, Anja
Seifert, Burkhard
Wetzel, Stephan
Agosti, Reto
author_facet Bumb, Anja
Seifert, Burkhard
Wetzel, Stephan
Agosti, Reto
author_sort Bumb, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate if white matter lesions (WML) on MRI can be a potential marker for onabotulinum toxin A (Botox®) treatment success in migraine, given the limited response rate and high costs per treatment. METHODS: Retrospective data base and MRI analysis of 529 migraineurs who received Botox® between 2002 and 2009. Responders were defined as patients who underwent three or more treatments, whereas non-responders had only one or two treatments. MRIs were analysed on axial T2 and coronar FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) sequences for the presence of WML. Statistical analysis was done with the Chi-Square-Test and the Mann–Whitney-U-Test. RESULTS: Of 529 Botox® treated migraineurs, 111 patients had a MRI. Of these 111 patients, 47 were responders, 64 non-responders to Botox®. Response rate to Botox® in migraineurs with WML was 55.3%, in migraineurs without WML 44.7%. In the investigated items “age”, “age at onset”, “gender”, “attack duration”, “frequency”, “aura”, “WML”, “size of WML”, we found no statistical significant difference between the two groups. 55% of the responders and 50% of the non-responders showed WML. All WML were located supratentorially, anteriorly, mostly of small size (3–5 mm). CONCLUSION: WML on MRIs cannot serve as a marker to predict a positive response to Botox®.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3755787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37557872013-09-04 Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker Bumb, Anja Seifert, Burkhard Wetzel, Stephan Agosti, Reto Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate if white matter lesions (WML) on MRI can be a potential marker for onabotulinum toxin A (Botox®) treatment success in migraine, given the limited response rate and high costs per treatment. METHODS: Retrospective data base and MRI analysis of 529 migraineurs who received Botox® between 2002 and 2009. Responders were defined as patients who underwent three or more treatments, whereas non-responders had only one or two treatments. MRIs were analysed on axial T2 and coronar FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) sequences for the presence of WML. Statistical analysis was done with the Chi-Square-Test and the Mann–Whitney-U-Test. RESULTS: Of 529 Botox® treated migraineurs, 111 patients had a MRI. Of these 111 patients, 47 were responders, 64 non-responders to Botox®. Response rate to Botox® in migraineurs with WML was 55.3%, in migraineurs without WML 44.7%. In the investigated items “age”, “age at onset”, “gender”, “attack duration”, “frequency”, “aura”, “WML”, “size of WML”, we found no statistical significant difference between the two groups. 55% of the responders and 50% of the non-responders showed WML. All WML were located supratentorially, anteriorly, mostly of small size (3–5 mm). CONCLUSION: WML on MRIs cannot serve as a marker to predict a positive response to Botox®. Springer International Publishing 2013-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3755787/ /pubmed/24010035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-377 Text en © Bumb et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bumb, Anja
Seifert, Burkhard
Wetzel, Stephan
Agosti, Reto
Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker
title Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker
title_full Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker
title_fullStr Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker
title_full_unstemmed Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker
title_short Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker
title_sort patients profiling for botox® (onabotulinum toxin a) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the mri as a potential marker
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3755787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-377
work_keys_str_mv AT bumbanja patientsprofilingforbotoxonabotulinumtoxinatreatmentformigrainealookatwhitematterlesionsinthemriasapotentialmarker
AT seifertburkhard patientsprofilingforbotoxonabotulinumtoxinatreatmentformigrainealookatwhitematterlesionsinthemriasapotentialmarker
AT wetzelstephan patientsprofilingforbotoxonabotulinumtoxinatreatmentformigrainealookatwhitematterlesionsinthemriasapotentialmarker
AT agostireto patientsprofilingforbotoxonabotulinumtoxinatreatmentformigrainealookatwhitematterlesionsinthemriasapotentialmarker