Cargando…

A sequence labeling approach to link medications and their attributes in clinical notes and clinical trial announcements for information extraction

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to evaluate machine learning methods, binary classification and sequence labeling, for medication–attribute linkage detection in two clinical corpora. DATA AND METHODS: We double annotated 3000 clinical trial announcements (CTA) and 1655 clinical notes (CN) for m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Qi, Zhai, Haijun, Deleger, Louise, Lingren, Todd, Kaiser, Megan, Stoutenborough, Laura, Solti, Imre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23268488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001487
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to evaluate machine learning methods, binary classification and sequence labeling, for medication–attribute linkage detection in two clinical corpora. DATA AND METHODS: We double annotated 3000 clinical trial announcements (CTA) and 1655 clinical notes (CN) for medication named entities and their attributes. A binary support vector machine (SVM) classification method with parsimonious feature sets, and a conditional random fields (CRF)-based multi-layered sequence labeling (MLSL) model were proposed to identify the linkages between the entities and their corresponding attributes. We evaluated the system's performance against the human-generated gold standard. RESULTS: The experiments showed that the two machine learning approaches performed statistically significantly better than the baseline rule-based approach. The binary SVM classification achieved 0.94 F-measure with individual tokens as features. The SVM model trained on a parsimonious feature set achieved 0.81 F-measure for CN and 0.87 for CTA. The CRF MLSL method achieved 0.80 F-measure on both corpora. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: We compared the novel MLSL method with a binary classification and a rule-based method. The MLSL method performed statistically significantly better than the rule-based method. However, the SVM-based binary classification method was statistically significantly better than the MLSL method for both the CTA and CN corpora. Using parsimonious feature sets both the SVM-based binary classification and CRF-based MLSL methods achieved high performance in detecting medication name and attribute linkages in CTA and CN.