Cargando…

Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area

The present fMRI study investigated the effects of word-likeness of visual and auditory stimuli on activity along the ventral visual stream. In the context of a one-back task, we presented visual and auditory words, pseudowords, and artificial stimuli (i.e., false-fonts and reversed-speech, respecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludersdorfer, Philipp, Schurz, Matthias, Richlan, Fabio, Kronbichler, Martin, Wimmer, Heinz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24009569
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00491
_version_ 1782282071221207040
author Ludersdorfer, Philipp
Schurz, Matthias
Richlan, Fabio
Kronbichler, Martin
Wimmer, Heinz
author_facet Ludersdorfer, Philipp
Schurz, Matthias
Richlan, Fabio
Kronbichler, Martin
Wimmer, Heinz
author_sort Ludersdorfer, Philipp
collection PubMed
description The present fMRI study investigated the effects of word-likeness of visual and auditory stimuli on activity along the ventral visual stream. In the context of a one-back task, we presented visual and auditory words, pseudowords, and artificial stimuli (i.e., false-fonts and reversed-speech, respectively). Main findings were regionally specific effects of word-likeness on activation in a left ventral occipitotemporal region corresponding to the classic localization of the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA). Specifically, we found an inverse word-likeness effect for the visual stimuli in the form of decreased activation for words compared to pseudowords which, in turn, elicited decreased activation compared to the artificial stimuli. For the auditory stimuli, we found positive word-likeness effects as both words and pseudowords elicited more activation than the artificial stimuli. This resulted from a marked deactivation in response to the artificial stimuli and no such deactivation for words and pseudowords. We suggest that the opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on VWFA activation can be explained by assuming the involvement of visual orthographic memory representations. For the visual stimuli, these representations reduce the coding effort as a function of word-likeness. This results in highest activation to the artificial stimuli and least activation to words for which corresponding representations exist. The positive auditory word-likeness effects may result from activation of orthographic information associated with the auditory words and pseudowords. The view that the VWFA has a primarily visual function is supported by our findings of high activation to the visual artificial stimuli (which have no phonological or semantic associations) and deactivation to the auditory artificial stimuli. According to the phenomenon of cross-modal sensory suppression such deactivations during demanding auditory processing are expected in visual regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3756304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37563042013-09-04 Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area Ludersdorfer, Philipp Schurz, Matthias Richlan, Fabio Kronbichler, Martin Wimmer, Heinz Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The present fMRI study investigated the effects of word-likeness of visual and auditory stimuli on activity along the ventral visual stream. In the context of a one-back task, we presented visual and auditory words, pseudowords, and artificial stimuli (i.e., false-fonts and reversed-speech, respectively). Main findings were regionally specific effects of word-likeness on activation in a left ventral occipitotemporal region corresponding to the classic localization of the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA). Specifically, we found an inverse word-likeness effect for the visual stimuli in the form of decreased activation for words compared to pseudowords which, in turn, elicited decreased activation compared to the artificial stimuli. For the auditory stimuli, we found positive word-likeness effects as both words and pseudowords elicited more activation than the artificial stimuli. This resulted from a marked deactivation in response to the artificial stimuli and no such deactivation for words and pseudowords. We suggest that the opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on VWFA activation can be explained by assuming the involvement of visual orthographic memory representations. For the visual stimuli, these representations reduce the coding effort as a function of word-likeness. This results in highest activation to the artificial stimuli and least activation to words for which corresponding representations exist. The positive auditory word-likeness effects may result from activation of orthographic information associated with the auditory words and pseudowords. The view that the VWFA has a primarily visual function is supported by our findings of high activation to the visual artificial stimuli (which have no phonological or semantic associations) and deactivation to the auditory artificial stimuli. According to the phenomenon of cross-modal sensory suppression such deactivations during demanding auditory processing are expected in visual regions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3756304/ /pubmed/24009569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00491 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ludersdorfer, Schurz, Richlan, Kronbichler and Wimmer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ludersdorfer, Philipp
Schurz, Matthias
Richlan, Fabio
Kronbichler, Martin
Wimmer, Heinz
Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area
title Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area
title_full Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area
title_fullStr Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area
title_full_unstemmed Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area
title_short Opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area
title_sort opposite effects of visual and auditory word-likeness on activity in the visual word form area
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24009569
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00491
work_keys_str_mv AT ludersdorferphilipp oppositeeffectsofvisualandauditorywordlikenessonactivityinthevisualwordformarea
AT schurzmatthias oppositeeffectsofvisualandauditorywordlikenessonactivityinthevisualwordformarea
AT richlanfabio oppositeeffectsofvisualandauditorywordlikenessonactivityinthevisualwordformarea
AT kronbichlermartin oppositeeffectsofvisualandauditorywordlikenessonactivityinthevisualwordformarea
AT wimmerheinz oppositeeffectsofvisualandauditorywordlikenessonactivityinthevisualwordformarea