Cargando…

Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing

Determining effective cleaning and disinfection regimes of livestock housing is vital to improving the health of resident animals and reducing zoonotic disease. A cleaning regime consisting of scraping, soaking with or without detergent (treatment and control), pressure washing, disinfection and nat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hancox, L. R., Le Bon, M., Dodd, C. E. R., Mellits, K. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23839725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.101392
_version_ 1782282107523956736
author Hancox, L. R.
Le Bon, M.
Dodd, C. E. R.
Mellits, K. H.
author_facet Hancox, L. R.
Le Bon, M.
Dodd, C. E. R.
Mellits, K. H.
author_sort Hancox, L. R.
collection PubMed
description Determining effective cleaning and disinfection regimes of livestock housing is vital to improving the health of resident animals and reducing zoonotic disease. A cleaning regime consisting of scraping, soaking with or without detergent (treatment and control), pressure washing, disinfection and natural drying was applied to multiple pig pens. After each cleaning stage, samples were taken from different materials and enumerated for total aerobic count (TAC) and Enterobacteriaceae (ENT). Soaking with detergent (Blast-Off, Biolink) caused significantly greater reductions of TAC and ENT on metal, and TAC on concrete, compared with control. Disinfection effect (Virkon S, DuPont) was not significantly associated with prior detergent treatment. Disinfection significantly reduced TAC and ENT on concrete and stock board but not on metal. Twenty-four hours after disinfection TAC and ENT on metal and stock board were significantly reduced, but no significant reductions occurred in the subsequent 96 hours. Counts on concrete did not significantly reduce during the entire drying period (120 hours). Detergent and disinfectant have varying bactericidal effects according to the surface and bacterial target; however, both can significantly reduce microbial numbers so should be used during cleaning, with a minimum drying period of 24 hours, to lower bacterial counts effectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3756521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37565212013-08-30 Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing Hancox, L. R. Le Bon, M. Dodd, C. E. R. Mellits, K. H. Vet Rec Research Determining effective cleaning and disinfection regimes of livestock housing is vital to improving the health of resident animals and reducing zoonotic disease. A cleaning regime consisting of scraping, soaking with or without detergent (treatment and control), pressure washing, disinfection and natural drying was applied to multiple pig pens. After each cleaning stage, samples were taken from different materials and enumerated for total aerobic count (TAC) and Enterobacteriaceae (ENT). Soaking with detergent (Blast-Off, Biolink) caused significantly greater reductions of TAC and ENT on metal, and TAC on concrete, compared with control. Disinfection effect (Virkon S, DuPont) was not significantly associated with prior detergent treatment. Disinfection significantly reduced TAC and ENT on concrete and stock board but not on metal. Twenty-four hours after disinfection TAC and ENT on metal and stock board were significantly reduced, but no significant reductions occurred in the subsequent 96 hours. Counts on concrete did not significantly reduce during the entire drying period (120 hours). Detergent and disinfectant have varying bactericidal effects according to the surface and bacterial target; however, both can significantly reduce microbial numbers so should be used during cleaning, with a minimum drying period of 24 hours, to lower bacterial counts effectively. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08-17 2013-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3756521/ /pubmed/23839725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.101392 Text en British Veterinary Association This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Research
Hancox, L. R.
Le Bon, M.
Dodd, C. E. R.
Mellits, K. H.
Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing
title Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing
title_full Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing
title_fullStr Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing
title_full_unstemmed Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing
title_short Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing
title_sort inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23839725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.101392
work_keys_str_mv AT hancoxlr inclusionofdetergentinacleaningregimeandeffectonmicrobialloadinlivestockhousing
AT lebonm inclusionofdetergentinacleaningregimeandeffectonmicrobialloadinlivestockhousing
AT doddcer inclusionofdetergentinacleaningregimeandeffectonmicrobialloadinlivestockhousing
AT mellitskh inclusionofdetergentinacleaningregimeandeffectonmicrobialloadinlivestockhousing