Cargando…
Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) include café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling. The former are frequently the earliest manifestation of NF1, and as such are of particular significance when assessing young children at risk of the condition. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23812910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101648 |
_version_ | 1782282108656418816 |
---|---|
author | Burkitt Wright, Emma MM Sach, Emma Sharif, Saba Quarrell, Oliver Carroll, Thomas Whitehouse, Richard W Upadhyaya, Meena Huson, Susan M Evans, D Gareth R |
author_facet | Burkitt Wright, Emma MM Sach, Emma Sharif, Saba Quarrell, Oliver Carroll, Thomas Whitehouse, Richard W Upadhyaya, Meena Huson, Susan M Evans, D Gareth R |
author_sort | Burkitt Wright, Emma MM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) include café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling. The former are frequently the earliest manifestation of NF1, and as such are of particular significance when assessing young children at risk of the condition. A phenotype of predominantly spinal neurofibromatosis has been identified in a small minority of families with NF1, often in association with a relative or absolute lack of cutaneous manifestations. An association with splicing and missense mutations has previously been reported for spinal neurofibromatosis, but on the basis of molecular results in only a few families. METHOD: Patients with spinal NF1 were identified through the Manchester nationally commissioned service for complex NF1. RESULTS: Five families with spinal NF1 were identified, with a broad spectrum of NF1 mutations, providing further evidence that this phenotype may arise in association with any genre of mutation in this gene. Pigmentary manifestations were absent or very mild in affected individuals. Several further affected individuals, some with extensive spinal root tumours, were ascertained when additional family members were assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical NF1 consensus criteria cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis of spinal NF1, especially in childhood. This emphasises the importance of molecular confirmation in individuals and families with atypical presentations of NF1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3756527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37565272013-08-30 Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis Burkitt Wright, Emma MM Sach, Emma Sharif, Saba Quarrell, Oliver Carroll, Thomas Whitehouse, Richard W Upadhyaya, Meena Huson, Susan M Evans, D Gareth R J Med Genet Genotype-Phenotype Correlations BACKGROUND: Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) include café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling. The former are frequently the earliest manifestation of NF1, and as such are of particular significance when assessing young children at risk of the condition. A phenotype of predominantly spinal neurofibromatosis has been identified in a small minority of families with NF1, often in association with a relative or absolute lack of cutaneous manifestations. An association with splicing and missense mutations has previously been reported for spinal neurofibromatosis, but on the basis of molecular results in only a few families. METHOD: Patients with spinal NF1 were identified through the Manchester nationally commissioned service for complex NF1. RESULTS: Five families with spinal NF1 were identified, with a broad spectrum of NF1 mutations, providing further evidence that this phenotype may arise in association with any genre of mutation in this gene. Pigmentary manifestations were absent or very mild in affected individuals. Several further affected individuals, some with extensive spinal root tumours, were ascertained when additional family members were assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical NF1 consensus criteria cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis of spinal NF1, especially in childhood. This emphasises the importance of molecular confirmation in individuals and families with atypical presentations of NF1. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-09 2013-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3756527/ /pubmed/23812910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101648 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Genotype-Phenotype Correlations Burkitt Wright, Emma MM Sach, Emma Sharif, Saba Quarrell, Oliver Carroll, Thomas Whitehouse, Richard W Upadhyaya, Meena Huson, Susan M Evans, D Gareth R Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis |
title | Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis |
title_full | Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis |
title_short | Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis |
title_sort | can the diagnosis of nf1 be excluded clinically? a lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis |
topic | Genotype-Phenotype Correlations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23812910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101648 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burkittwrightemmamm canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT sachemma canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT sharifsaba canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT quarrelloliver canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT carrollthomas canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT whitehouserichardw canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT upadhyayameena canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT husonsusanm canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis AT evansdgarethr canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis |