Cargando…

Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) include café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling. The former are frequently the earliest manifestation of NF1, and as such are of particular significance when assessing young children at risk of the condition. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burkitt Wright, Emma MM, Sach, Emma, Sharif, Saba, Quarrell, Oliver, Carroll, Thomas, Whitehouse, Richard W, Upadhyaya, Meena, Huson, Susan M, Evans, D Gareth R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23812910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101648
_version_ 1782282108656418816
author Burkitt Wright, Emma MM
Sach, Emma
Sharif, Saba
Quarrell, Oliver
Carroll, Thomas
Whitehouse, Richard W
Upadhyaya, Meena
Huson, Susan M
Evans, D Gareth R
author_facet Burkitt Wright, Emma MM
Sach, Emma
Sharif, Saba
Quarrell, Oliver
Carroll, Thomas
Whitehouse, Richard W
Upadhyaya, Meena
Huson, Susan M
Evans, D Gareth R
author_sort Burkitt Wright, Emma MM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) include café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling. The former are frequently the earliest manifestation of NF1, and as such are of particular significance when assessing young children at risk of the condition. A phenotype of predominantly spinal neurofibromatosis has been identified in a small minority of families with NF1, often in association with a relative or absolute lack of cutaneous manifestations. An association with splicing and missense mutations has previously been reported for spinal neurofibromatosis, but on the basis of molecular results in only a few families. METHOD: Patients with spinal NF1 were identified through the Manchester nationally commissioned service for complex NF1. RESULTS: Five families with spinal NF1 were identified, with a broad spectrum of NF1 mutations, providing further evidence that this phenotype may arise in association with any genre of mutation in this gene. Pigmentary manifestations were absent or very mild in affected individuals. Several further affected individuals, some with extensive spinal root tumours, were ascertained when additional family members were assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical NF1 consensus criteria cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis of spinal NF1, especially in childhood. This emphasises the importance of molecular confirmation in individuals and families with atypical presentations of NF1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3756527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37565272013-08-30 Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis Burkitt Wright, Emma MM Sach, Emma Sharif, Saba Quarrell, Oliver Carroll, Thomas Whitehouse, Richard W Upadhyaya, Meena Huson, Susan M Evans, D Gareth R J Med Genet Genotype-Phenotype Correlations BACKGROUND: Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) include café-au-lait macules and skinfold freckling. The former are frequently the earliest manifestation of NF1, and as such are of particular significance when assessing young children at risk of the condition. A phenotype of predominantly spinal neurofibromatosis has been identified in a small minority of families with NF1, often in association with a relative or absolute lack of cutaneous manifestations. An association with splicing and missense mutations has previously been reported for spinal neurofibromatosis, but on the basis of molecular results in only a few families. METHOD: Patients with spinal NF1 were identified through the Manchester nationally commissioned service for complex NF1. RESULTS: Five families with spinal NF1 were identified, with a broad spectrum of NF1 mutations, providing further evidence that this phenotype may arise in association with any genre of mutation in this gene. Pigmentary manifestations were absent or very mild in affected individuals. Several further affected individuals, some with extensive spinal root tumours, were ascertained when additional family members were assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical NF1 consensus criteria cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis of spinal NF1, especially in childhood. This emphasises the importance of molecular confirmation in individuals and families with atypical presentations of NF1. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-09 2013-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3756527/ /pubmed/23812910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101648 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
Burkitt Wright, Emma MM
Sach, Emma
Sharif, Saba
Quarrell, Oliver
Carroll, Thomas
Whitehouse, Richard W
Upadhyaya, Meena
Huson, Susan M
Evans, D Gareth R
Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
title Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
title_full Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
title_fullStr Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
title_short Can the diagnosis of NF1 be excluded clinically? A lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
title_sort can the diagnosis of nf1 be excluded clinically? a lack of pigmentary findings in families with spinal neurofibromatosis demonstrates a limitation of clinical diagnosis
topic Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23812910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101648
work_keys_str_mv AT burkittwrightemmamm canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT sachemma canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT sharifsaba canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT quarrelloliver canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT carrollthomas canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT whitehouserichardw canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT upadhyayameena canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT husonsusanm canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis
AT evansdgarethr canthediagnosisofnf1beexcludedclinicallyalackofpigmentaryfindingsinfamilieswithspinalneurofibromatosisdemonstratesalimitationofclinicaldiagnosis