Cargando…

Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears

1. Spatiotemporal segregation is often explained by the risk for offspring predation or by differences in physiology, predation risk vulnerability or competitive abilities related to size dimorphism. 2. Most large carnivores are size dimorphic and offspring predation is often intraspecific and relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steyaert, Sam MJG, Kindberg, Jonas, Swenson, Jon E, Zedrosser, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23461483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12055
_version_ 1782282191622897664
author Steyaert, Sam MJG
Kindberg, Jonas
Swenson, Jon E
Zedrosser, Andreas
author_facet Steyaert, Sam MJG
Kindberg, Jonas
Swenson, Jon E
Zedrosser, Andreas
author_sort Steyaert, Sam MJG
collection PubMed
description 1. Spatiotemporal segregation is often explained by the risk for offspring predation or by differences in physiology, predation risk vulnerability or competitive abilities related to size dimorphism. 2. Most large carnivores are size dimorphic and offspring predation is often intraspecific and related to nonparental infanticide (NPI). NPI can be a foraging strategy, a strategy to reduce competition, or a male reproductive strategy. Spatiotemporal segregation is widespread among large carnivores, but its nature remains poorly understood. 3. We evaluated three hypotheses to explain spatiotemporal segregation in the brown bear, a size-dimorphic large carnivore in which NPI is common; the ‘NPI – foraging/competition hypothesis', i.e. NPI as a foraging strategy or a strategy to reduce competition, the ‘NPI – sexual selection hypothesis’, i.e. infanticide as a male reproductive strategy and the ‘body size hypothesis’, i.e. body-size-related differences in physiology, predation risk vulnerability or competitive ability causes spatiotemporal segregation. To test these hypotheses, we quantified spatiotemporal segregation among adult males, lone adult females and females with cubs-of-the-year, based on GPS-relocation data (2006–2010) and resource selection functions in a Scandinavian population. 4. We found that spatiotemporal segregation was strongest between females with cubs-of-the-year and adult males during the mating season. During the mating season, females with cubs-of-the-year selected their resources, in contrast to adult males, in less rugged landscapes in relative close proximity to certain human-related variables, and in more open habitat types. After the mating season, females with cubs-of-the-year markedly shifted their resource selection towards a pattern more similar to that of their conspecifics. No strong spatiotemporal segregation was apparent between females with cubs-of-the-year and conspecifics during the mating and the postmating season. 5. The ‘NPI – sexual selection hypothesis’ best explained spatiotemporal segregation in our study system. We suggest that females with cubs-of-the-year alter their resource selection to avoid infanticidal males. In species exhibiting NPI as a male reproductive strategy, female avoidance of infanticidal males is probably more common than observed or reported, and may come with a fitness cost if females trade safety for optimal resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3757318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37573182013-09-04 Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears Steyaert, Sam MJG Kindberg, Jonas Swenson, Jon E Zedrosser, Andreas J Anim Ecol Life Histories 1. Spatiotemporal segregation is often explained by the risk for offspring predation or by differences in physiology, predation risk vulnerability or competitive abilities related to size dimorphism. 2. Most large carnivores are size dimorphic and offspring predation is often intraspecific and related to nonparental infanticide (NPI). NPI can be a foraging strategy, a strategy to reduce competition, or a male reproductive strategy. Spatiotemporal segregation is widespread among large carnivores, but its nature remains poorly understood. 3. We evaluated three hypotheses to explain spatiotemporal segregation in the brown bear, a size-dimorphic large carnivore in which NPI is common; the ‘NPI – foraging/competition hypothesis', i.e. NPI as a foraging strategy or a strategy to reduce competition, the ‘NPI – sexual selection hypothesis’, i.e. infanticide as a male reproductive strategy and the ‘body size hypothesis’, i.e. body-size-related differences in physiology, predation risk vulnerability or competitive ability causes spatiotemporal segregation. To test these hypotheses, we quantified spatiotemporal segregation among adult males, lone adult females and females with cubs-of-the-year, based on GPS-relocation data (2006–2010) and resource selection functions in a Scandinavian population. 4. We found that spatiotemporal segregation was strongest between females with cubs-of-the-year and adult males during the mating season. During the mating season, females with cubs-of-the-year selected their resources, in contrast to adult males, in less rugged landscapes in relative close proximity to certain human-related variables, and in more open habitat types. After the mating season, females with cubs-of-the-year markedly shifted their resource selection towards a pattern more similar to that of their conspecifics. No strong spatiotemporal segregation was apparent between females with cubs-of-the-year and conspecifics during the mating and the postmating season. 5. The ‘NPI – sexual selection hypothesis’ best explained spatiotemporal segregation in our study system. We suggest that females with cubs-of-the-year alter their resource selection to avoid infanticidal males. In species exhibiting NPI as a male reproductive strategy, female avoidance of infanticidal males is probably more common than observed or reported, and may come with a fitness cost if females trade safety for optimal resources. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-07 2013-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3757318/ /pubmed/23461483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12055 Text en © 2013 British Ecological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Life Histories
Steyaert, Sam MJG
Kindberg, Jonas
Swenson, Jon E
Zedrosser, Andreas
Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears
title Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears
title_full Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears
title_fullStr Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears
title_full_unstemmed Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears
title_short Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears
title_sort male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears
topic Life Histories
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23461483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12055
work_keys_str_mv AT steyaertsammjg malereproductivestrategyexplainsspatiotemporalsegregationinbrownbears
AT kindbergjonas malereproductivestrategyexplainsspatiotemporalsegregationinbrownbears
AT swensonjone malereproductivestrategyexplainsspatiotemporalsegregationinbrownbears
AT zedrosserandreas malereproductivestrategyexplainsspatiotemporalsegregationinbrownbears