Cargando…

Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()

Neuronal underpinnings of auditory verbal hallucination remain poorly understood. One suggested mechanism is brain activation that is similar to verbal imagery but occurs without the proper activation of the neuronal systems that are required to tag the origins of verbal imagery in one's mind....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raij, Tuukka T., Riekki, Tapani J.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24179739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2012.09.007
_version_ 1782282253197377536
author Raij, Tuukka T.
Riekki, Tapani J.J.
author_facet Raij, Tuukka T.
Riekki, Tapani J.J.
author_sort Raij, Tuukka T.
collection PubMed
description Neuronal underpinnings of auditory verbal hallucination remain poorly understood. One suggested mechanism is brain activation that is similar to verbal imagery but occurs without the proper activation of the neuronal systems that are required to tag the origins of verbal imagery in one's mind. Such neuronal systems involve the supplementary motor area. The supplementary motor area has been associated with awareness of intention to make a hand movement, but whether this region is related to the sense of ownership of one's verbal thought remains poorly known. We hypothesized that the supplementary motor area is related to the distinction between one's own mental processing (auditory verbal imagery) and similar processing that is attributed to non-self author (auditory verbal hallucination). To test this hypothesis, we asked patients to signal the onset and offset of their auditory verbal hallucinations during functional magnetic resonance imaging. During non-hallucination periods, we asked the same patients to imagine the hallucination they had previously experienced. In addition, healthy control subjects signaled the onset and offset of self-paced imagery of similar voices. Both hallucinations and the imagery of hallucinations were associated with similar activation strengths of the fronto-temporal language-related circuitries, but the supplementary motor area was activated more strongly during the imagery than during hallucination. These findings suggest that auditory verbal hallucination resembles verbal imagery in language processing, but without the involvement of the supplementary motor area, which may subserve the sense of ownership of one's own verbal imagery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3757718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37577182013-10-31 Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination() Raij, Tuukka T. Riekki, Tapani J.J. Neuroimage Clin Article Neuronal underpinnings of auditory verbal hallucination remain poorly understood. One suggested mechanism is brain activation that is similar to verbal imagery but occurs without the proper activation of the neuronal systems that are required to tag the origins of verbal imagery in one's mind. Such neuronal systems involve the supplementary motor area. The supplementary motor area has been associated with awareness of intention to make a hand movement, but whether this region is related to the sense of ownership of one's verbal thought remains poorly known. We hypothesized that the supplementary motor area is related to the distinction between one's own mental processing (auditory verbal imagery) and similar processing that is attributed to non-self author (auditory verbal hallucination). To test this hypothesis, we asked patients to signal the onset and offset of their auditory verbal hallucinations during functional magnetic resonance imaging. During non-hallucination periods, we asked the same patients to imagine the hallucination they had previously experienced. In addition, healthy control subjects signaled the onset and offset of self-paced imagery of similar voices. Both hallucinations and the imagery of hallucinations were associated with similar activation strengths of the fronto-temporal language-related circuitries, but the supplementary motor area was activated more strongly during the imagery than during hallucination. These findings suggest that auditory verbal hallucination resembles verbal imagery in language processing, but without the involvement of the supplementary motor area, which may subserve the sense of ownership of one's own verbal imagery. Elsevier 2012-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3757718/ /pubmed/24179739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2012.09.007 Text en © 2012 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Raij, Tuukka T.
Riekki, Tapani J.J.
Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()
title Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()
title_full Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()
title_fullStr Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()
title_full_unstemmed Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()
title_short Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()
title_sort poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24179739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2012.09.007
work_keys_str_mv AT raijtuukkat poorsupplementarymotorareaactivationdifferentiatesauditoryverbalhallucinationfromimaginingthehallucination
AT riekkitapanijj poorsupplementarymotorareaactivationdifferentiatesauditoryverbalhallucinationfromimaginingthehallucination