Cargando…

Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses

PURPOSE: To compare two different doses of propofol for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion in children undergoing out-patient surgeries. BACKGROUND: Insertion of LMA just after anesthesia induction is facilitated using propofol. However, the optimal dose of this drug not determined yet as heavy d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyedhejazi, Mahin, Eydi, Mahmoud, Ghojazadeh, Morteza, Nejati, Aref, Ghabili, Kamyar, Golzari, Samad EJ, Iranpour, Afshin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24015128
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.115339
_version_ 1782282270322720768
author Seyedhejazi, Mahin
Eydi, Mahmoud
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Nejati, Aref
Ghabili, Kamyar
Golzari, Samad EJ
Iranpour, Afshin
author_facet Seyedhejazi, Mahin
Eydi, Mahmoud
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Nejati, Aref
Ghabili, Kamyar
Golzari, Samad EJ
Iranpour, Afshin
author_sort Seyedhejazi, Mahin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare two different doses of propofol for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion in children undergoing out-patient surgeries. BACKGROUND: Insertion of LMA just after anesthesia induction is facilitated using propofol. However, the optimal dose of this drug not determined yet as heavy doses may lead to severe complications, whereas lower doses may not be quite as effective. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 120 children undergoing out-patient surgeries were recruited to receive intravenous propofol at a dose of either 2.5 mg/kg (group 1) or 3.5 mg/kg (group 2) for induction. Intravenous midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 μg/kg) were used as pre-medication in all patients and anesthesia induction was initiated using lidocaine (1 mg/kg) prior to propofol administration. Hemodynamic changes, probable complications, quality of the established airway and number of attempts for LMA insertion were compared between two groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and intraoperative complications between the groups (P>0.05). LMA insertion was successful at the first attempt in 55 (93.2%) and 54 (91.5%) cases in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P>0.05). The efficiency of the established airways was adequate in all the patients of both groups. CONCLUSION: It seems that propofol doses of 2.5 and 3.5 mg/kg are equally effective for LMA insertion following intravenous midazolam, fentanyl, and lidocaine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3757798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37577982013-09-06 Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses Seyedhejazi, Mahin Eydi, Mahmoud Ghojazadeh, Morteza Nejati, Aref Ghabili, Kamyar Golzari, Samad EJ Iranpour, Afshin Saudi J Anaesth Original Article PURPOSE: To compare two different doses of propofol for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion in children undergoing out-patient surgeries. BACKGROUND: Insertion of LMA just after anesthesia induction is facilitated using propofol. However, the optimal dose of this drug not determined yet as heavy doses may lead to severe complications, whereas lower doses may not be quite as effective. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 120 children undergoing out-patient surgeries were recruited to receive intravenous propofol at a dose of either 2.5 mg/kg (group 1) or 3.5 mg/kg (group 2) for induction. Intravenous midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 μg/kg) were used as pre-medication in all patients and anesthesia induction was initiated using lidocaine (1 mg/kg) prior to propofol administration. Hemodynamic changes, probable complications, quality of the established airway and number of attempts for LMA insertion were compared between two groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and intraoperative complications between the groups (P>0.05). LMA insertion was successful at the first attempt in 55 (93.2%) and 54 (91.5%) cases in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P>0.05). The efficiency of the established airways was adequate in all the patients of both groups. CONCLUSION: It seems that propofol doses of 2.5 and 3.5 mg/kg are equally effective for LMA insertion following intravenous midazolam, fentanyl, and lidocaine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3757798/ /pubmed/24015128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.115339 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seyedhejazi, Mahin
Eydi, Mahmoud
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Nejati, Aref
Ghabili, Kamyar
Golzari, Samad EJ
Iranpour, Afshin
Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses
title Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses
title_full Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses
title_fullStr Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses
title_full_unstemmed Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses
title_short Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses
title_sort propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: effect of two different doses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24015128
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.115339
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedhejazimahin propofolforlaryngealmaskairwayinsertioninchildreneffectoftwodifferentdoses
AT eydimahmoud propofolforlaryngealmaskairwayinsertioninchildreneffectoftwodifferentdoses
AT ghojazadehmorteza propofolforlaryngealmaskairwayinsertioninchildreneffectoftwodifferentdoses
AT nejatiaref propofolforlaryngealmaskairwayinsertioninchildreneffectoftwodifferentdoses
AT ghabilikamyar propofolforlaryngealmaskairwayinsertioninchildreneffectoftwodifferentdoses
AT golzarisamadej propofolforlaryngealmaskairwayinsertioninchildreneffectoftwodifferentdoses
AT iranpourafshin propofolforlaryngealmaskairwayinsertioninchildreneffectoftwodifferentdoses