Cargando…

Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities

This article describes an investigation to determine the optimal placement of accelerometers for the purpose of detecting a range of everyday activities. The paper investigates the effect of combining data from accelerometers placed at various bodily locations on the accuracy of activity detection....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cleland, Ian, Kikhia, Basel, Nugent, Chris, Boytsov, Andrey, Hallberg, Josef, Synnes, Kåre, McClean, Sally, Finlay, Dewar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23867744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130709183
_version_ 1782477155853139968
author Cleland, Ian
Kikhia, Basel
Nugent, Chris
Boytsov, Andrey
Hallberg, Josef
Synnes, Kåre
McClean, Sally
Finlay, Dewar
author_facet Cleland, Ian
Kikhia, Basel
Nugent, Chris
Boytsov, Andrey
Hallberg, Josef
Synnes, Kåre
McClean, Sally
Finlay, Dewar
author_sort Cleland, Ian
collection PubMed
description This article describes an investigation to determine the optimal placement of accelerometers for the purpose of detecting a range of everyday activities. The paper investigates the effect of combining data from accelerometers placed at various bodily locations on the accuracy of activity detection. Eight healthy males participated within the study. Data were collected from six wireless tri-axial accelerometers placed at the chest, wrist, lower back, hip, thigh and foot. Activities included walking, running on a motorized treadmill, sitting, lying, standing and walking up and down stairs. The Support Vector Machine provided the most accurate detection of activities of all the machine learning algorithms investigated. Although data from all locations provided similar levels of accuracy, the hip was the best single location to record data for activity detection using a Support Vector Machine, providing small but significantly better accuracy than the other investigated locations. Increasing the number of sensing locations from one to two or more statistically increased the accuracy of classification. There was no significant difference in accuracy when using two or more sensors. It was noted, however, that the difference in activity detection using single or multiple accelerometers may be more pronounced when trying to detect finer grain activities. Future work shall therefore investigate the effects of accelerometer placement on a larger range of these activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3758644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37586442013-09-04 Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities Cleland, Ian Kikhia, Basel Nugent, Chris Boytsov, Andrey Hallberg, Josef Synnes, Kåre McClean, Sally Finlay, Dewar Sensors (Basel) Article This article describes an investigation to determine the optimal placement of accelerometers for the purpose of detecting a range of everyday activities. The paper investigates the effect of combining data from accelerometers placed at various bodily locations on the accuracy of activity detection. Eight healthy males participated within the study. Data were collected from six wireless tri-axial accelerometers placed at the chest, wrist, lower back, hip, thigh and foot. Activities included walking, running on a motorized treadmill, sitting, lying, standing and walking up and down stairs. The Support Vector Machine provided the most accurate detection of activities of all the machine learning algorithms investigated. Although data from all locations provided similar levels of accuracy, the hip was the best single location to record data for activity detection using a Support Vector Machine, providing small but significantly better accuracy than the other investigated locations. Increasing the number of sensing locations from one to two or more statistically increased the accuracy of classification. There was no significant difference in accuracy when using two or more sensors. It was noted, however, that the difference in activity detection using single or multiple accelerometers may be more pronounced when trying to detect finer grain activities. Future work shall therefore investigate the effects of accelerometer placement on a larger range of these activities. MDPI 2013-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3758644/ /pubmed/23867744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130709183 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cleland, Ian
Kikhia, Basel
Nugent, Chris
Boytsov, Andrey
Hallberg, Josef
Synnes, Kåre
McClean, Sally
Finlay, Dewar
Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities
title Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities
title_full Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities
title_fullStr Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities
title_short Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities
title_sort optimal placement of accelerometers for the detection of everyday activities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23867744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130709183
work_keys_str_mv AT clelandian optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities
AT kikhiabasel optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities
AT nugentchris optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities
AT boytsovandrey optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities
AT hallbergjosef optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities
AT synneskare optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities
AT mccleansally optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities
AT finlaydewar optimalplacementofaccelerometersforthedetectionofeverydayactivities