Cargando…
Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens
CONTEXT: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the major health problems. Urine culture is considered as a gold standard method for the diagnosis of UTI. But, improper sample collection can lead to contamination with normal urogenital flora. Use of any portable disinfectant that can reduce contami...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24014962 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.115910 |
_version_ | 1782477160765718528 |
---|---|
author | Shrestha, Rashmi Gyawali, Narayan Gurung, Rajendra Amatya, Ritu Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar |
author_facet | Shrestha, Rashmi Gyawali, Narayan Gurung, Rajendra Amatya, Ritu Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar |
author_sort | Shrestha, Rashmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the major health problems. Urine culture is considered as a gold standard method for the diagnosis of UTI. But, improper sample collection can lead to contamination with normal urogenital flora. Use of any portable disinfectant that can reduce contamination rate would be the significant help in urine culture interpretation. AIMS: To observe the effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional comparative study was done in 600 patients aged 15-45 years, equally divided into three groups. The first group was given sterile container and instructed to collect midstream clean catch urine (MSU) after urogenital cleaning with provided piece of paper soap. The second group was given sterile container and strictly instructed to collect the MSU sample after urogenital cleansing by tap water only. The third group was given the sterile container and asked for midstream urine. Collected specimens were inoculated in CLED media, incubated aerobically for overnight at 37°C. Reporting of culture was done according to the guideline of American Society of Microbiology. RESULTS: The contamination rate in the three groups were 6.0%, 13.0%, and 27.5%, respectively (P value < 0.05), which was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Contamination rate was significantly lower in group who provided urine specimen after urogenital cleaning with paper soap. Thus, cleaning the urogenital area may reduce the need of the repeat sample to rule out actual contamination and prevent from the unnecessary antibiotic treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3758698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37586982013-09-06 Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens Shrestha, Rashmi Gyawali, Narayan Gurung, Rajendra Amatya, Ritu Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar J Lab Physicians Original Article CONTEXT: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the major health problems. Urine culture is considered as a gold standard method for the diagnosis of UTI. But, improper sample collection can lead to contamination with normal urogenital flora. Use of any portable disinfectant that can reduce contamination rate would be the significant help in urine culture interpretation. AIMS: To observe the effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional comparative study was done in 600 patients aged 15-45 years, equally divided into three groups. The first group was given sterile container and instructed to collect midstream clean catch urine (MSU) after urogenital cleaning with provided piece of paper soap. The second group was given sterile container and strictly instructed to collect the MSU sample after urogenital cleansing by tap water only. The third group was given the sterile container and asked for midstream urine. Collected specimens were inoculated in CLED media, incubated aerobically for overnight at 37°C. Reporting of culture was done according to the guideline of American Society of Microbiology. RESULTS: The contamination rate in the three groups were 6.0%, 13.0%, and 27.5%, respectively (P value < 0.05), which was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Contamination rate was significantly lower in group who provided urine specimen after urogenital cleaning with paper soap. Thus, cleaning the urogenital area may reduce the need of the repeat sample to rule out actual contamination and prevent from the unnecessary antibiotic treatment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3758698/ /pubmed/24014962 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.115910 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Laboratory Physicians http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shrestha, Rashmi Gyawali, Narayan Gurung, Rajendra Amatya, Ritu Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens |
title | Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens |
title_full | Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens |
title_fullStr | Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens |
title_short | Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens |
title_sort | effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting midstream urine specimens |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24014962 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.115910 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shrestharashmi effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens AT gyawalinarayan effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens AT gurungrajendra effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens AT amatyaritu effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens AT bhattacharyashyamalkumar effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens |