Cargando…

Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens

CONTEXT: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the major health problems. Urine culture is considered as a gold standard method for the diagnosis of UTI. But, improper sample collection can lead to contamination with normal urogenital flora. Use of any portable disinfectant that can reduce contami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Rashmi, Gyawali, Narayan, Gurung, Rajendra, Amatya, Ritu, Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24014962
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.115910
_version_ 1782477160765718528
author Shrestha, Rashmi
Gyawali, Narayan
Gurung, Rajendra
Amatya, Ritu
Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar
author_facet Shrestha, Rashmi
Gyawali, Narayan
Gurung, Rajendra
Amatya, Ritu
Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar
author_sort Shrestha, Rashmi
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the major health problems. Urine culture is considered as a gold standard method for the diagnosis of UTI. But, improper sample collection can lead to contamination with normal urogenital flora. Use of any portable disinfectant that can reduce contamination rate would be the significant help in urine culture interpretation. AIMS: To observe the effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional comparative study was done in 600 patients aged 15-45 years, equally divided into three groups. The first group was given sterile container and instructed to collect midstream clean catch urine (MSU) after urogenital cleaning with provided piece of paper soap. The second group was given sterile container and strictly instructed to collect the MSU sample after urogenital cleansing by tap water only. The third group was given the sterile container and asked for midstream urine. Collected specimens were inoculated in CLED media, incubated aerobically for overnight at 37°C. Reporting of culture was done according to the guideline of American Society of Microbiology. RESULTS: The contamination rate in the three groups were 6.0%, 13.0%, and 27.5%, respectively (P value < 0.05), which was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Contamination rate was significantly lower in group who provided urine specimen after urogenital cleaning with paper soap. Thus, cleaning the urogenital area may reduce the need of the repeat sample to rule out actual contamination and prevent from the unnecessary antibiotic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3758698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37586982013-09-06 Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens Shrestha, Rashmi Gyawali, Narayan Gurung, Rajendra Amatya, Ritu Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar J Lab Physicians Original Article CONTEXT: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the major health problems. Urine culture is considered as a gold standard method for the diagnosis of UTI. But, improper sample collection can lead to contamination with normal urogenital flora. Use of any portable disinfectant that can reduce contamination rate would be the significant help in urine culture interpretation. AIMS: To observe the effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional comparative study was done in 600 patients aged 15-45 years, equally divided into three groups. The first group was given sterile container and instructed to collect midstream clean catch urine (MSU) after urogenital cleaning with provided piece of paper soap. The second group was given sterile container and strictly instructed to collect the MSU sample after urogenital cleansing by tap water only. The third group was given the sterile container and asked for midstream urine. Collected specimens were inoculated in CLED media, incubated aerobically for overnight at 37°C. Reporting of culture was done according to the guideline of American Society of Microbiology. RESULTS: The contamination rate in the three groups were 6.0%, 13.0%, and 27.5%, respectively (P value < 0.05), which was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Contamination rate was significantly lower in group who provided urine specimen after urogenital cleaning with paper soap. Thus, cleaning the urogenital area may reduce the need of the repeat sample to rule out actual contamination and prevent from the unnecessary antibiotic treatment. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3758698/ /pubmed/24014962 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.115910 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Laboratory Physicians http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shrestha, Rashmi
Gyawali, Narayan
Gurung, Rajendra
Amatya, Ritu
Bhattacharya, Shyamal Kumar
Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens
title Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens
title_full Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens
title_fullStr Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens
title_short Effect of Urogenital Cleaning with Paper Soap on Bacterial Contamination Rate While Collecting Midstream Urine Specimens
title_sort effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting midstream urine specimens
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24014962
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.115910
work_keys_str_mv AT shrestharashmi effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens
AT gyawalinarayan effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens
AT gurungrajendra effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens
AT amatyaritu effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens
AT bhattacharyashyamalkumar effectofurogenitalcleaningwithpapersoaponbacterialcontaminationratewhilecollectingmidstreamurinespecimens