Cargando…

How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To investigate which antecedent risk factors can explain the social patterning in hospital use. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with up to 37 years of follow-up. SETTING: Representative community sample in the West of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 7049 men and 8353 women aged 45–64 years were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCartney, Gerry, Hart, Carole, Watt, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23996814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002433
_version_ 1782477184773914624
author McCartney, Gerry
Hart, Carole
Watt, Graham
author_facet McCartney, Gerry
Hart, Carole
Watt, Graham
author_sort McCartney, Gerry
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate which antecedent risk factors can explain the social patterning in hospital use. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with up to 37 years of follow-up. SETTING: Representative community sample in the West of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 7049 men and 8353 women aged 45–64 years were recruited into the study from the general population between 1972 and 1976 (78% of the eligible population). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital admissions and bed days by cause and by classification into emergency or non-emergency. RESULTS: All-cause hospital admission rate ratios (RRs) were not obviously socially patterned for women (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.10) or men (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06) in social classes IV and V compared with social classes I and II. However, cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease and stroke in women, and respiratory disease for men and women were socially patterned, although this attenuated markedly with the addition of baseline risk factors. Hospital bed days were generally socially patterned and the differences were largely explained by baseline risk factors. The overall RRs of mental health admissions in contrast were socially patterned for women (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.27) and men (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.06) in social classes IV and V compared with social classes I and II, but the pattern did not attenuate with the addition of baseline risk factors. Emergency hospital admissions were associated with lower social class, but there was an inverse relationship for non-emergency hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall admissions to hospital were only marginally socially patterned, and less than would be expected on the basis of the gradient in baseline risk. However, there was marked social patterning in admissions for mental health problems. Non-emergency hospital admissions were patterned inversely according to risk. Further work is required to explain and address this inequitable gradient in healthcare use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3758975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37589752013-09-03 How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study McCartney, Gerry Hart, Carole Watt, Graham BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To investigate which antecedent risk factors can explain the social patterning in hospital use. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with up to 37 years of follow-up. SETTING: Representative community sample in the West of Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 7049 men and 8353 women aged 45–64 years were recruited into the study from the general population between 1972 and 1976 (78% of the eligible population). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital admissions and bed days by cause and by classification into emergency or non-emergency. RESULTS: All-cause hospital admission rate ratios (RRs) were not obviously socially patterned for women (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.10) or men (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06) in social classes IV and V compared with social classes I and II. However, cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease and stroke in women, and respiratory disease for men and women were socially patterned, although this attenuated markedly with the addition of baseline risk factors. Hospital bed days were generally socially patterned and the differences were largely explained by baseline risk factors. The overall RRs of mental health admissions in contrast were socially patterned for women (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.27) and men (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.06) in social classes IV and V compared with social classes I and II, but the pattern did not attenuate with the addition of baseline risk factors. Emergency hospital admissions were associated with lower social class, but there was an inverse relationship for non-emergency hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall admissions to hospital were only marginally socially patterned, and less than would be expected on the basis of the gradient in baseline risk. However, there was marked social patterning in admissions for mental health problems. Non-emergency hospital admissions were patterned inversely according to risk. Further work is required to explain and address this inequitable gradient in healthcare use. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3758975/ /pubmed/23996814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002433 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
McCartney, Gerry
Hart, Carole
Watt, Graham
How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study
title How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study
title_full How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study
title_fullStr How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study
title_full_unstemmed How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study
title_short How can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? A cohort study
title_sort how can socioeconomic inequalities in hospital admissions be explained? a cohort study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23996814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002433
work_keys_str_mv AT mccartneygerry howcansocioeconomicinequalitiesinhospitaladmissionsbeexplainedacohortstudy
AT hartcarole howcansocioeconomicinequalitiesinhospitaladmissionsbeexplainedacohortstudy
AT wattgraham howcansocioeconomicinequalitiesinhospitaladmissionsbeexplainedacohortstudy