Cargando…
Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma
PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy with Ologen implant vs. trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C (MMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, pilot study, 39 eyes of 33 subjects with medically uncontrolled primary glaucoma, aged 18 years or above underwent trabecu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571259 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.109520 |
_version_ | 1782477208712904704 |
---|---|
author | Senthil, Sirisha Rao, Harsha L Babu, Jonnadula G Mandal, Anil K Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar |
author_facet | Senthil, Sirisha Rao, Harsha L Babu, Jonnadula G Mandal, Anil K Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar |
author_sort | Senthil, Sirisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy with Ologen implant vs. trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C (MMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, pilot study, 39 eyes of 33 subjects with medically uncontrolled primary glaucoma, aged 18 years or above underwent trabeculectomy either with MMC (20 eyes) or with Ologen implant (19 eyes). The primary outcome measure was cumulative success probability, defined as complete if the intraocular pressure (IOP) was > 5 and ≤ 21 mm Hg without anti-glaucoma medications or additional surgery and qualified if an IOP was > 5 and ≤ 21 mm Hg with or without anti-glaucoma medications. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) follow-up in Ologen group was 19.1 ± 8.1 months, and in MMC group was 18.0 ± 8.4 months. Mean IOP reduction at 6 months was significantly lower (P = 0.01) in the MMC group (11.9 ± 2.9 mm Hg) as compared to Ologen group (14.6 ± 2.7 mm Hg). However, at 12 months (P = 0.81) and 24 months (P = 0.32), the mean IOP was similar between the 2 groups. Complete success probability at the end of 6 months in Ologen group was 100% (95% confidence interval: 59.1 - 99.0) was similar (P = 0.53) to that in MMC group (93.8%, 95% CI: 63.2 - 99.1). The incidences of early post-operative complications were similar in the 2 groups, except hyphema, which was significantly more in Ologen group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, the success of trabeculectomy and complications were similar in both Ologen and MMC groups at the end of 6 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3759104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37591042013-09-09 Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma Senthil, Sirisha Rao, Harsha L Babu, Jonnadula G Mandal, Anil K Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy with Ologen implant vs. trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C (MMC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, pilot study, 39 eyes of 33 subjects with medically uncontrolled primary glaucoma, aged 18 years or above underwent trabeculectomy either with MMC (20 eyes) or with Ologen implant (19 eyes). The primary outcome measure was cumulative success probability, defined as complete if the intraocular pressure (IOP) was > 5 and ≤ 21 mm Hg without anti-glaucoma medications or additional surgery and qualified if an IOP was > 5 and ≤ 21 mm Hg with or without anti-glaucoma medications. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) follow-up in Ologen group was 19.1 ± 8.1 months, and in MMC group was 18.0 ± 8.4 months. Mean IOP reduction at 6 months was significantly lower (P = 0.01) in the MMC group (11.9 ± 2.9 mm Hg) as compared to Ologen group (14.6 ± 2.7 mm Hg). However, at 12 months (P = 0.81) and 24 months (P = 0.32), the mean IOP was similar between the 2 groups. Complete success probability at the end of 6 months in Ologen group was 100% (95% confidence interval: 59.1 - 99.0) was similar (P = 0.53) to that in MMC group (93.8%, 95% CI: 63.2 - 99.1). The incidences of early post-operative complications were similar in the 2 groups, except hyphema, which was significantly more in Ologen group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, the success of trabeculectomy and complications were similar in both Ologen and MMC groups at the end of 6 months. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3759104/ /pubmed/23571259 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.109520 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Senthil, Sirisha Rao, Harsha L Babu, Jonnadula G Mandal, Anil K Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma |
title | Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma |
title_full | Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma |
title_short | Comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma |
title_sort | comparison of outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin c vs. ologen implant in primary glaucoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571259 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.109520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senthilsirisha comparisonofoutcomesoftrabeculectomywithmitomycincvsologenimplantinprimaryglaucoma AT raoharshal comparisonofoutcomesoftrabeculectomywithmitomycincvsologenimplantinprimaryglaucoma AT babujonnadulag comparisonofoutcomesoftrabeculectomywithmitomycincvsologenimplantinprimaryglaucoma AT mandalanilk comparisonofoutcomesoftrabeculectomywithmitomycincvsologenimplantinprimaryglaucoma AT garudadrichandrasekhar comparisonofoutcomesoftrabeculectomywithmitomycincvsologenimplantinprimaryglaucoma |