Cargando…

Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples

BACKGROUND: Recently, BRAF inhibitors showed dramatic treatment outcomes in BRAF V600 mutant melanoma. Therefore, the accuracy of BRAF mutation test is critical. METHODS: BRAF mutations were tested by dual-priming oligonucleotide-polymerase chain reaction (DPO-PCR), direct sequencing and subsequentl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Soomin, Lee, Jeeyun, Sung, Ji-Youn, Kang, So Young, Ha, Sang Yun, Jang, Kee-Taek, Choi, Yoon-La, Kim, Jung-Sun, Oh, Young Lyun, Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Pathologists and The Korean Society for Cytopathology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24009630
http://dx.doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.4.348
_version_ 1782477271081156608
author Ahn, Soomin
Lee, Jeeyun
Sung, Ji-Youn
Kang, So Young
Ha, Sang Yun
Jang, Kee-Taek
Choi, Yoon-La
Kim, Jung-Sun
Oh, Young Lyun
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_facet Ahn, Soomin
Lee, Jeeyun
Sung, Ji-Youn
Kang, So Young
Ha, Sang Yun
Jang, Kee-Taek
Choi, Yoon-La
Kim, Jung-Sun
Oh, Young Lyun
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_sort Ahn, Soomin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, BRAF inhibitors showed dramatic treatment outcomes in BRAF V600 mutant melanoma. Therefore, the accuracy of BRAF mutation test is critical. METHODS: BRAF mutations were tested by dual-priming oligonucleotide-polymerase chain reaction (DPO-PCR), direct sequencing and subsequently retested with a real-time PCR assay, cobas 4800 V600 mutation test. In total, 64 tumors including 34 malignant melanomas and 16 papillary thyroid carcinomas were analyzed. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples and the results of cobas test were directly compared with those of DPO-PCR and direct sequencing. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were found in 23 of 64 (35.9%) tumors. There was 9.4% discordance among 3 methods. Out of 6 discordant cases, 4 cases were melanomas; 3 cases were BRAF V600E detected only by cobas test, but were not detected by DPO-PCR and direct sequencing. One melanoma patient with BRAF mutation detected only by cobas test has been on vemurafenib treatment for 6 months and showed a dramatic response to vemurafenib. DPO-PCR failed to detect V600K mutation in one case identified by both direct sequencing and cobas test. CONCLUSIONS: In direct comparison of the currently available DPO-PCR, direct sequencing and real-time cobas test for BRAF mutation, real-time PCR assay is the most sensitive method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3759634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society of Pathologists and The Korean Society for Cytopathology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37596342013-09-04 Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples Ahn, Soomin Lee, Jeeyun Sung, Ji-Youn Kang, So Young Ha, Sang Yun Jang, Kee-Taek Choi, Yoon-La Kim, Jung-Sun Oh, Young Lyun Kim, Kyoung-Mee Korean J Pathol Original Article BACKGROUND: Recently, BRAF inhibitors showed dramatic treatment outcomes in BRAF V600 mutant melanoma. Therefore, the accuracy of BRAF mutation test is critical. METHODS: BRAF mutations were tested by dual-priming oligonucleotide-polymerase chain reaction (DPO-PCR), direct sequencing and subsequently retested with a real-time PCR assay, cobas 4800 V600 mutation test. In total, 64 tumors including 34 malignant melanomas and 16 papillary thyroid carcinomas were analyzed. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples and the results of cobas test were directly compared with those of DPO-PCR and direct sequencing. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were found in 23 of 64 (35.9%) tumors. There was 9.4% discordance among 3 methods. Out of 6 discordant cases, 4 cases were melanomas; 3 cases were BRAF V600E detected only by cobas test, but were not detected by DPO-PCR and direct sequencing. One melanoma patient with BRAF mutation detected only by cobas test has been on vemurafenib treatment for 6 months and showed a dramatic response to vemurafenib. DPO-PCR failed to detect V600K mutation in one case identified by both direct sequencing and cobas test. CONCLUSIONS: In direct comparison of the currently available DPO-PCR, direct sequencing and real-time cobas test for BRAF mutation, real-time PCR assay is the most sensitive method. The Korean Society of Pathologists and The Korean Society for Cytopathology 2013-08 2013-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3759634/ /pubmed/24009630 http://dx.doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.4.348 Text en © 2013 The Korean Society of Pathologists/The Korean Society for Cytopathology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahn, Soomin
Lee, Jeeyun
Sung, Ji-Youn
Kang, So Young
Ha, Sang Yun
Jang, Kee-Taek
Choi, Yoon-La
Kim, Jung-Sun
Oh, Young Lyun
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples
title Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples
title_full Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples
title_fullStr Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples
title_short Comparison of Three BRAF Mutation Tests in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Clinical Samples
title_sort comparison of three braf mutation tests in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded clinical samples
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3759634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24009630
http://dx.doi.org/10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.4.348
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnsoomin comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT leejeeyun comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT sungjiyoun comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT kangsoyoung comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT hasangyun comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT jangkeetaek comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT choiyoonla comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT kimjungsun comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT ohyounglyun comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples
AT kimkyoungmee comparisonofthreebrafmutationtestsinformalinfixedparaffinembeddedclinicalsamples