Cargando…

Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine

BACKGROUND: The main stay of primary and secondary prevention of periodontal diseases has been the control of supra gingival plaque. Acceptable plaque control by mechanical means is difficult to achieve by most individuals, so mouth rinses represent one form of attack on oral microbes and the malodo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rath, S. K., Singh, Munishwar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3760361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24019806
_version_ 1782282763735400448
author Rath, S. K.
Singh, Munishwar
author_facet Rath, S. K.
Singh, Munishwar
author_sort Rath, S. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The main stay of primary and secondary prevention of periodontal diseases has been the control of supra gingival plaque. Acceptable plaque control by mechanical means is difficult to achieve by most individuals, so mouth rinses represent one form of attack on oral microbes and the malodor. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent known to cause damage to the cell membrane of microorganisms and at higher concentrations causes precipitation and coagulation of the proteins in the cytoplasm of the exposed microbes. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 0.12% and 0.2% concentration of CHX gluconate clinically as well as microbiologically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single blind placebo controlled randomized study design comprising of 75 males with an age between 25 years and 50 years were selected from out-patient Department of Periodontics. The subjects were randomly divided into five groups. After baseline clinical and microbiological examination, the groups were subjected to mechanical plaque control with or without mouthwashes containing various concentrations of CHX and placebo. After 90 days the data pertaining to clinical and microbiological parameters were compared to the baseline data so as to compare the efficacy of different concentrations of mouthwashes. RESULTS: The results achieved with the use of 0.2% and 0.12% concentrations of CHX were comparable; taking into consideration of various clinical and microbiological parameters. CONCLUSION: The study recommends the use of low concentration of (0.12%) CHX for better patient compliance with the optimum clinical results
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3760361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37603612013-09-09 Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine Rath, S. K. Singh, Munishwar Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The main stay of primary and secondary prevention of periodontal diseases has been the control of supra gingival plaque. Acceptable plaque control by mechanical means is difficult to achieve by most individuals, so mouth rinses represent one form of attack on oral microbes and the malodor. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent known to cause damage to the cell membrane of microorganisms and at higher concentrations causes precipitation and coagulation of the proteins in the cytoplasm of the exposed microbes. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 0.12% and 0.2% concentration of CHX gluconate clinically as well as microbiologically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single blind placebo controlled randomized study design comprising of 75 males with an age between 25 years and 50 years were selected from out-patient Department of Periodontics. The subjects were randomly divided into five groups. After baseline clinical and microbiological examination, the groups were subjected to mechanical plaque control with or without mouthwashes containing various concentrations of CHX and placebo. After 90 days the data pertaining to clinical and microbiological parameters were compared to the baseline data so as to compare the efficacy of different concentrations of mouthwashes. RESULTS: The results achieved with the use of 0.2% and 0.12% concentrations of CHX were comparable; taking into consideration of various clinical and microbiological parameters. CONCLUSION: The study recommends the use of low concentration of (0.12%) CHX for better patient compliance with the optimum clinical results Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3760361/ /pubmed/24019806 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rath, S. K.
Singh, Munishwar
Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine
title Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine
title_full Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine
title_fullStr Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine
title_short Comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine
title_sort comparative clinical and microbiological efficacy of mouthwashes containing 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3760361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24019806
work_keys_str_mv AT rathsk comparativeclinicalandmicrobiologicalefficacyofmouthwashescontaining02and012chlorhexidine
AT singhmunishwar comparativeclinicalandmicrobiologicalefficacyofmouthwashescontaining02and012chlorhexidine