Cargando…

Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging

BACKGROUND: Reducing inappropriate use of imaging to stage incident prostate cancer is a challenging problem highlighted recently as a Physician Quality Reporting System quality measure and by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Urological Association in the Choosing Wisely ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makarov, Danil V., Loeb, Stacy, Ulmert, David, Drevin, Linda, Lambe, Mats, Stattin, Pär
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3760779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23853055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt175
_version_ 1782282789274517504
author Makarov, Danil V.
Loeb, Stacy
Ulmert, David
Drevin, Linda
Lambe, Mats
Stattin, Pär
author_facet Makarov, Danil V.
Loeb, Stacy
Ulmert, David
Drevin, Linda
Lambe, Mats
Stattin, Pär
author_sort Makarov, Danil V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing inappropriate use of imaging to stage incident prostate cancer is a challenging problem highlighted recently as a Physician Quality Reporting System quality measure and by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Urological Association in the Choosing Wisely campaign. Since 2000, the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden has led an effort to decrease national rates of inappropriate prostate cancer imaging by disseminating utilization data along with the latest imaging guidelines to urologists in Sweden. We sought to determine the temporal and regional effects of this effort on prostate cancer imaging rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study among men diagnosed with prostate cancer from the NPCR from 1998 to 2009 (n = 99 879). We analyzed imaging use over time stratified by clinical risk category (low, intermediate, high) and geographic region. Generalized linear models with a logit link were used to test for time trend. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of men underwent imaging within 6 months of prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall, imaging use decreased over time, particularly in the low-risk category, among whom the imaging rate decreased from 45% to 3% (P < .001), but also in the high-risk category, among whom the rate decreased from 63% to 47% (P < .001). Despite substantial regional variation, all regions experienced clinically and statistically (P < .001) significant decreases in prostate cancer imaging. CONCLUSIONS: A Swedish effort to provide data on prostate cancer imaging use and imaging guidelines to clinicians was associated with a reduction in inappropriate imaging over a 10-year period, as well as slightly decreased appropriate imaging in high-risk patients. These results may inform current efforts to promote guideline-concordant imaging in the United States and internationally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3760779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37607792013-09-04 Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging Makarov, Danil V. Loeb, Stacy Ulmert, David Drevin, Linda Lambe, Mats Stattin, Pär J Natl Cancer Inst Article BACKGROUND: Reducing inappropriate use of imaging to stage incident prostate cancer is a challenging problem highlighted recently as a Physician Quality Reporting System quality measure and by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Urological Association in the Choosing Wisely campaign. Since 2000, the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden has led an effort to decrease national rates of inappropriate prostate cancer imaging by disseminating utilization data along with the latest imaging guidelines to urologists in Sweden. We sought to determine the temporal and regional effects of this effort on prostate cancer imaging rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study among men diagnosed with prostate cancer from the NPCR from 1998 to 2009 (n = 99 879). We analyzed imaging use over time stratified by clinical risk category (low, intermediate, high) and geographic region. Generalized linear models with a logit link were used to test for time trend. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of men underwent imaging within 6 months of prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall, imaging use decreased over time, particularly in the low-risk category, among whom the imaging rate decreased from 45% to 3% (P < .001), but also in the high-risk category, among whom the rate decreased from 63% to 47% (P < .001). Despite substantial regional variation, all regions experienced clinically and statistically (P < .001) significant decreases in prostate cancer imaging. CONCLUSIONS: A Swedish effort to provide data on prostate cancer imaging use and imaging guidelines to clinicians was associated with a reduction in inappropriate imaging over a 10-year period, as well as slightly decreased appropriate imaging in high-risk patients. These results may inform current efforts to promote guideline-concordant imaging in the United States and internationally. Oxford University Press 2013-09-04 2013-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3760779/ /pubmed/23853055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt175 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Makarov, Danil V.
Loeb, Stacy
Ulmert, David
Drevin, Linda
Lambe, Mats
Stattin, Pär
Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging
title Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging
title_full Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging
title_fullStr Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging
title_short Prostate Cancer Imaging Trends After a Nationwide Effort to Discourage Inappropriate Prostate Cancer Imaging
title_sort prostate cancer imaging trends after a nationwide effort to discourage inappropriate prostate cancer imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3760779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23853055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt175
work_keys_str_mv AT makarovdanilv prostatecancerimagingtrendsafteranationwideefforttodiscourageinappropriateprostatecancerimaging
AT loebstacy prostatecancerimagingtrendsafteranationwideefforttodiscourageinappropriateprostatecancerimaging
AT ulmertdavid prostatecancerimagingtrendsafteranationwideefforttodiscourageinappropriateprostatecancerimaging
AT drevinlinda prostatecancerimagingtrendsafteranationwideefforttodiscourageinappropriateprostatecancerimaging
AT lambemats prostatecancerimagingtrendsafteranationwideefforttodiscourageinappropriateprostatecancerimaging
AT stattinpar prostatecancerimagingtrendsafteranationwideefforttodiscourageinappropriateprostatecancerimaging