Cargando…

Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sommer, Anders, Kronborg, Mads Brix, Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt, Böttcher, Morten, Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde, Bouchelouche, Kirsten, Mortensen, Peter Thomas, Gerdes, Christian, Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-113
_version_ 1782282873972195328
author Sommer, Anders
Kronborg, Mads Brix
Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt
Böttcher, Morten
Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde
Bouchelouche, Kirsten
Mortensen, Peter Thomas
Gerdes, Christian
Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
author_facet Sommer, Anders
Kronborg, Mads Brix
Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt
Böttcher, Morten
Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde
Bouchelouche, Kirsten
Mortensen, Peter Thomas
Gerdes, Christian
Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
author_sort Sommer, Anders
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to clarify whether multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement improves clinical outcome after CRT. METHODS/DESIGN: The ImagingCRT study is a prospective, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, two-armed trial. The study is designed to investigate the effect of imaging guided left ventricular lead positioning on a clinical composite primary endpoint comprising all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or unchanged or worsened functional capacity (no improvement in New York Heart Association class and <10% improvement in six-minute-walk test). Imaging guided LV lead positioning is targeted to the latest activated non-scarred myocardial region by speckle tracking echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac computed tomography. Secondary endpoints include changes in LV dimensions, ejection fraction and dyssynchrony. A total of 192 patients are included in the study. DISCUSSION: Despite tremendous advances in knowledge with CRT, the proportion of patients not responding to this treatment has remained stable since the introduction of CRT. ImagingCRT is a prospective, randomized study assessing the clinical and echocardiographic effect of multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement in CRT. The results are expected to make an important contribution in the pursuit of increasing response rate to CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01323686. The trial was registered March 25, 2011 and the first study subject was randomized April 11, 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3762069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37620692013-09-05 Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Sommer, Anders Kronborg, Mads Brix Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt Böttcher, Morten Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde Bouchelouche, Kirsten Mortensen, Peter Thomas Gerdes, Christian Nielsen, Jens Cosedis Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to clarify whether multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement improves clinical outcome after CRT. METHODS/DESIGN: The ImagingCRT study is a prospective, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, two-armed trial. The study is designed to investigate the effect of imaging guided left ventricular lead positioning on a clinical composite primary endpoint comprising all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or unchanged or worsened functional capacity (no improvement in New York Heart Association class and <10% improvement in six-minute-walk test). Imaging guided LV lead positioning is targeted to the latest activated non-scarred myocardial region by speckle tracking echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac computed tomography. Secondary endpoints include changes in LV dimensions, ejection fraction and dyssynchrony. A total of 192 patients are included in the study. DISCUSSION: Despite tremendous advances in knowledge with CRT, the proportion of patients not responding to this treatment has remained stable since the introduction of CRT. ImagingCRT is a prospective, randomized study assessing the clinical and echocardiographic effect of multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement in CRT. The results are expected to make an important contribution in the pursuit of increasing response rate to CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01323686. The trial was registered March 25, 2011 and the first study subject was randomized April 11, 2011. BioMed Central 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3762069/ /pubmed/23782792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-113 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sommer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sommer, Anders
Kronborg, Mads Brix
Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt
Böttcher, Morten
Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde
Bouchelouche, Kirsten
Mortensen, Peter Thomas
Gerdes, Christian
Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (imagingcrt): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-113
work_keys_str_mv AT sommeranders empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kronborgmadsbrix empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT poulsensteenhvitfeldt empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bottchermorten empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nørgaardbjarnelinde empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bouchelouchekirsten empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mortensenpeterthomas empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gerdeschristian empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nielsenjenscosedis empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial