Cargando…
Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-113 |
_version_ | 1782282873972195328 |
---|---|
author | Sommer, Anders Kronborg, Mads Brix Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt Böttcher, Morten Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde Bouchelouche, Kirsten Mortensen, Peter Thomas Gerdes, Christian Nielsen, Jens Cosedis |
author_facet | Sommer, Anders Kronborg, Mads Brix Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt Böttcher, Morten Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde Bouchelouche, Kirsten Mortensen, Peter Thomas Gerdes, Christian Nielsen, Jens Cosedis |
author_sort | Sommer, Anders |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to clarify whether multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement improves clinical outcome after CRT. METHODS/DESIGN: The ImagingCRT study is a prospective, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, two-armed trial. The study is designed to investigate the effect of imaging guided left ventricular lead positioning on a clinical composite primary endpoint comprising all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or unchanged or worsened functional capacity (no improvement in New York Heart Association class and <10% improvement in six-minute-walk test). Imaging guided LV lead positioning is targeted to the latest activated non-scarred myocardial region by speckle tracking echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac computed tomography. Secondary endpoints include changes in LV dimensions, ejection fraction and dyssynchrony. A total of 192 patients are included in the study. DISCUSSION: Despite tremendous advances in knowledge with CRT, the proportion of patients not responding to this treatment has remained stable since the introduction of CRT. ImagingCRT is a prospective, randomized study assessing the clinical and echocardiographic effect of multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement in CRT. The results are expected to make an important contribution in the pursuit of increasing response rate to CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01323686. The trial was registered March 25, 2011 and the first study subject was randomized April 11, 2011. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3762069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37620692013-09-05 Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Sommer, Anders Kronborg, Mads Brix Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt Böttcher, Morten Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde Bouchelouche, Kirsten Mortensen, Peter Thomas Gerdes, Christian Nielsen, Jens Cosedis Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in heart failure patients. However, a large proportion of patients remain nonresponsive to this pacing strategy. Left ventricular (LV) lead position is one of the main determinants of response to CRT. This study aims to clarify whether multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement improves clinical outcome after CRT. METHODS/DESIGN: The ImagingCRT study is a prospective, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, two-armed trial. The study is designed to investigate the effect of imaging guided left ventricular lead positioning on a clinical composite primary endpoint comprising all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or unchanged or worsened functional capacity (no improvement in New York Heart Association class and <10% improvement in six-minute-walk test). Imaging guided LV lead positioning is targeted to the latest activated non-scarred myocardial region by speckle tracking echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac computed tomography. Secondary endpoints include changes in LV dimensions, ejection fraction and dyssynchrony. A total of 192 patients are included in the study. DISCUSSION: Despite tremendous advances in knowledge with CRT, the proportion of patients not responding to this treatment has remained stable since the introduction of CRT. ImagingCRT is a prospective, randomized study assessing the clinical and echocardiographic effect of multimodality imaging guided LV lead placement in CRT. The results are expected to make an important contribution in the pursuit of increasing response rate to CRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01323686. The trial was registered March 25, 2011 and the first study subject was randomized April 11, 2011. BioMed Central 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3762069/ /pubmed/23782792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-113 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sommer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Sommer, Anders Kronborg, Mads Brix Poulsen, Steen Hvitfeldt Böttcher, Morten Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde Bouchelouche, Kirsten Mortensen, Peter Thomas Gerdes, Christian Nielsen, Jens Cosedis Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (ImagingCRT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | empiric versus imaging guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (imagingcrt): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sommeranders empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kronborgmadsbrix empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT poulsensteenhvitfeldt empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bottchermorten empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nørgaardbjarnelinde empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bouchelouchekirsten empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mortensenpeterthomas empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gerdeschristian empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nielsenjenscosedis empiricversusimagingguidedleftventricularleadplacementincardiacresynchronizationtherapyimagingcrtstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |