Cargando…
Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study
The objective of this study was to measure intradiscal pressure (IDP) changes in the lower cervical spine during a manual cervical distraction (MCD) procedure. Incisions were made anteriorly, and pressure transducers were inserted into each nucleus at lower cervical discs. Four skilled doctors of ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/954134 |
_version_ | 1782282875839709184 |
---|---|
author | Gudavalli, M. R. Potluri, T. Carandang, G. Havey, R. M. Voronov, L. I. Cox, J. M. Rowell, R. M. Kruse, R. A. Joachim, G. C. Patwardhan, A. G. Henderson, C. N. R. Goertz, C. |
author_facet | Gudavalli, M. R. Potluri, T. Carandang, G. Havey, R. M. Voronov, L. I. Cox, J. M. Rowell, R. M. Kruse, R. A. Joachim, G. C. Patwardhan, A. G. Henderson, C. N. R. Goertz, C. |
author_sort | Gudavalli, M. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to measure intradiscal pressure (IDP) changes in the lower cervical spine during a manual cervical distraction (MCD) procedure. Incisions were made anteriorly, and pressure transducers were inserted into each nucleus at lower cervical discs. Four skilled doctors of chiropractic (DCs) performed MCD procedure on nine specimens in prone position with contacts at C5 or at C6 vertebrae with the headpiece in different positions. IDP changes, traction forces, and manually applied posterior-to-anterior forces were analyzed using descriptive statistics. IDP decreases were observed during MCD procedure at all lower cervical levels C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7. The mean IDP decreases were as high as 168.7 KPa. Mean traction forces were as high as 119.2 N. Posterior-to-anterior forces applied during manual traction were as high as 82.6 N. Intraclinician reliability for IDP decrease was high for all four DCs. While two DCs had high intraclinician reliability for applied traction force, the other two DCs demonstrated only moderate reliability. IDP decreases were greatest during moving flexion and traction. They were progressevely less pronouced with neutral traction, fixed flexion and traction, and generalized traction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3762077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37620772013-09-10 Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study Gudavalli, M. R. Potluri, T. Carandang, G. Havey, R. M. Voronov, L. I. Cox, J. M. Rowell, R. M. Kruse, R. A. Joachim, G. C. Patwardhan, A. G. Henderson, C. N. R. Goertz, C. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article The objective of this study was to measure intradiscal pressure (IDP) changes in the lower cervical spine during a manual cervical distraction (MCD) procedure. Incisions were made anteriorly, and pressure transducers were inserted into each nucleus at lower cervical discs. Four skilled doctors of chiropractic (DCs) performed MCD procedure on nine specimens in prone position with contacts at C5 or at C6 vertebrae with the headpiece in different positions. IDP changes, traction forces, and manually applied posterior-to-anterior forces were analyzed using descriptive statistics. IDP decreases were observed during MCD procedure at all lower cervical levels C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7. The mean IDP decreases were as high as 168.7 KPa. Mean traction forces were as high as 119.2 N. Posterior-to-anterior forces applied during manual traction were as high as 82.6 N. Intraclinician reliability for IDP decrease was high for all four DCs. While two DCs had high intraclinician reliability for applied traction force, the other two DCs demonstrated only moderate reliability. IDP decreases were greatest during moving flexion and traction. They were progressevely less pronouced with neutral traction, fixed flexion and traction, and generalized traction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3762077/ /pubmed/24023587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/954134 Text en Copyright © 2013 M. R. Gudavalli et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gudavalli, M. R. Potluri, T. Carandang, G. Havey, R. M. Voronov, L. I. Cox, J. M. Rowell, R. M. Kruse, R. A. Joachim, G. C. Patwardhan, A. G. Henderson, C. N. R. Goertz, C. Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study |
title | Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study |
title_full | Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study |
title_fullStr | Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study |
title_short | Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study |
title_sort | intradiscal pressure changes during manual cervical distraction: a cadaveric study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/954134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gudavallimr intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT potlurit intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT carandangg intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT haveyrm intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT voronovli intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT coxjm intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT rowellrm intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT krusera intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT joachimgc intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT patwardhanag intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT hendersoncnr intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy AT goertzc intradiscalpressurechangesduringmanualcervicaldistractionacadavericstudy |