Cargando…

Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness

Individuals who do not consistently use the same hand to perform unimanual tasks (inconsistent-handed) outperform consistent right- and left-handed individuals on tests of episodic memory. We explored whether the inconsistent-hander (ICH) memory advantage extends to memory for unimanual hand use its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edlin, James M., Carris, Emily K., Lyle, Keith B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24027522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00555
_version_ 1782282893184204800
author Edlin, James M.
Carris, Emily K.
Lyle, Keith B.
author_facet Edlin, James M.
Carris, Emily K.
Lyle, Keith B.
author_sort Edlin, James M.
collection PubMed
description Individuals who do not consistently use the same hand to perform unimanual tasks (inconsistent-handed) outperform consistent right- and left-handed individuals on tests of episodic memory. We explored whether the inconsistent-hander (ICH) memory advantage extends to memory for unimanual hand use itself. Are ICHs better able to remember which hand they used to perform actions? Opposing predictions are possible, stemming from the finding that some regions of the corpus callosum are larger in ICHs, especially those that connect motor areas. One hypothesis is that greater callosally mediated interhemispheric interaction produces ICHs’ superior retrieval of episodic memories, and this may extend to episodic memories for hand use. Alternatively, we also hypothesized that greater interhemispheric interaction could produce more bilateral activation in motor areas during the performance and retrieval of unimanual actions. This could interfere with ICHs’ ability to remember which hand they used. To test these competing predictions in the current study, consistent- and inconsistent-handers performed unimanual actions, half of which required manipulating objects and half of which did not. Each action was performed four times in one of five conditions that differed in the ratio of left to right hand use: always left (4:0), usually left (3:1), equal (2:2), usually right (1:3), or always right (0:4). We compared consistent- and inconsistent-handers on recall of the left:right ratio for each action. ICHs remembered how they performed actions better than consistent-handers, regardless of ratio. These findings provide another example of superior episodic retrieval in ICHs. We discuss how greater interaction might benefit memory for hand use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3762217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37622172013-09-11 Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness Edlin, James M. Carris, Emily K. Lyle, Keith B. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Individuals who do not consistently use the same hand to perform unimanual tasks (inconsistent-handed) outperform consistent right- and left-handed individuals on tests of episodic memory. We explored whether the inconsistent-hander (ICH) memory advantage extends to memory for unimanual hand use itself. Are ICHs better able to remember which hand they used to perform actions? Opposing predictions are possible, stemming from the finding that some regions of the corpus callosum are larger in ICHs, especially those that connect motor areas. One hypothesis is that greater callosally mediated interhemispheric interaction produces ICHs’ superior retrieval of episodic memories, and this may extend to episodic memories for hand use. Alternatively, we also hypothesized that greater interhemispheric interaction could produce more bilateral activation in motor areas during the performance and retrieval of unimanual actions. This could interfere with ICHs’ ability to remember which hand they used. To test these competing predictions in the current study, consistent- and inconsistent-handers performed unimanual actions, half of which required manipulating objects and half of which did not. Each action was performed four times in one of five conditions that differed in the ratio of left to right hand use: always left (4:0), usually left (3:1), equal (2:2), usually right (1:3), or always right (0:4). We compared consistent- and inconsistent-handers on recall of the left:right ratio for each action. ICHs remembered how they performed actions better than consistent-handers, regardless of ratio. These findings provide another example of superior episodic retrieval in ICHs. We discuss how greater interaction might benefit memory for hand use. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3762217/ /pubmed/24027522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00555 Text en Copyright © 2013 Edlin, Carris and Lyle. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Edlin, James M.
Carris, Emily K.
Lyle, Keith B.
Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness
title Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness
title_full Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness
title_fullStr Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness
title_full_unstemmed Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness
title_short Memory for Hand-Use Depends on Consistency of Handedness
title_sort memory for hand-use depends on consistency of handedness
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24027522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00555
work_keys_str_mv AT edlinjamesm memoryforhandusedependsonconsistencyofhandedness
AT carrisemilyk memoryforhandusedependsonconsistencyofhandedness
AT lylekeithb memoryforhandusedependsonconsistencyofhandedness