Cargando…

Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) and completeness of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) diagnosis coding in a hospital registry within a population-based health-care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregersen, Henrik, Larsen, Caroline Brenner, Haglund, Anne, Mortensen, Rikke, Andersen, Niels Frost, Nørgaard, Mette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24009431
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S50757
_version_ 1782282927006023680
author Gregersen, Henrik
Larsen, Caroline Brenner
Haglund, Anne
Mortensen, Rikke
Andersen, Niels Frost
Nørgaard, Mette
author_facet Gregersen, Henrik
Larsen, Caroline Brenner
Haglund, Anne
Mortensen, Rikke
Andersen, Niels Frost
Nørgaard, Mette
author_sort Gregersen, Henrik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) and completeness of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) diagnosis coding in a hospital registry within a population-based health-care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR), we identified 627 patients registered with MGUS in two Danish regions during the period January 2001–February 2011. We reviewed the medical records of all patients registered with MGUS at the Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, and a sample of patients registered at the other three hematological departments in the two regions. We estimated the PPV of the MGUS diagnosis based on this sample of 327 medical records. We also estimated the completeness of the DNPR by linking data from the DNPR and data from a previously validated MGUS cohort of 791 patients identified through the laboratory system covering North Jutland Region. RESULTS: The diagnosis of MGUS was confirmed in 231 patients and assessed as probable in an additional 38 patients, corresponding to a PPV of 82.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.1%–86.4%). By contrast, 58 (17.7%) of the patients did not definitively meet the diagnostic criteria for MGUS. When we excluded patients registered with malignant monoclonal gammopathy recorded prior to or within the first year after registration of MGUS in the DNPR, the PPV increased to 88.3% (95% CI 84.5%–92.1%). The DNPR only registered a diagnosis of MGUS in 133 of the 791 MGUS patients identified through the laboratory system, corresponding to a completeness of 16.8% (95% CI 14.1%–19.6%). CONCLUSION: The PPV of the diagnosis coding for MGUS in the DNPR is high and can be further improved by simple data restriction. However, the low completeness raises concern that MGUS patients registered in the hospital system may be highly selected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3762761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37627612013-09-05 Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry Gregersen, Henrik Larsen, Caroline Brenner Haglund, Anne Mortensen, Rikke Andersen, Niels Frost Nørgaard, Mette Clin Epidemiol Original Research OBJECTIVE: To estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) and completeness of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) diagnosis coding in a hospital registry within a population-based health-care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR), we identified 627 patients registered with MGUS in two Danish regions during the period January 2001–February 2011. We reviewed the medical records of all patients registered with MGUS at the Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, and a sample of patients registered at the other three hematological departments in the two regions. We estimated the PPV of the MGUS diagnosis based on this sample of 327 medical records. We also estimated the completeness of the DNPR by linking data from the DNPR and data from a previously validated MGUS cohort of 791 patients identified through the laboratory system covering North Jutland Region. RESULTS: The diagnosis of MGUS was confirmed in 231 patients and assessed as probable in an additional 38 patients, corresponding to a PPV of 82.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.1%–86.4%). By contrast, 58 (17.7%) of the patients did not definitively meet the diagnostic criteria for MGUS. When we excluded patients registered with malignant monoclonal gammopathy recorded prior to or within the first year after registration of MGUS in the DNPR, the PPV increased to 88.3% (95% CI 84.5%–92.1%). The DNPR only registered a diagnosis of MGUS in 133 of the 791 MGUS patients identified through the laboratory system, corresponding to a completeness of 16.8% (95% CI 14.1%–19.6%). CONCLUSION: The PPV of the diagnosis coding for MGUS in the DNPR is high and can be further improved by simple data restriction. However, the low completeness raises concern that MGUS patients registered in the hospital system may be highly selected. Dove Medical Press 2013-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3762761/ /pubmed/24009431 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S50757 Text en © 2013 Gregersen et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gregersen, Henrik
Larsen, Caroline Brenner
Haglund, Anne
Mortensen, Rikke
Andersen, Niels Frost
Nørgaard, Mette
Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry
title Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry
title_full Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry
title_fullStr Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry
title_full_unstemmed Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry
title_short Data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry
title_sort data quality of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosis in a hospital registry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24009431
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S50757
work_keys_str_mv AT gregersenhenrik dataqualityofthemonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancediagnosisinahospitalregistry
AT larsencarolinebrenner dataqualityofthemonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancediagnosisinahospitalregistry
AT haglundanne dataqualityofthemonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancediagnosisinahospitalregistry
AT mortensenrikke dataqualityofthemonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancediagnosisinahospitalregistry
AT andersennielsfrost dataqualityofthemonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancediagnosisinahospitalregistry
AT nørgaardmette dataqualityofthemonoclonalgammopathyofundeterminedsignificancediagnosisinahospitalregistry