Cargando…

The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care

AIMS: To determine whether the introduction of the Universal Form of Treatment Options (the UFTO), as an alternative approach to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders, reduces harms in patients in whom a decision not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was made, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fritz, Zoë, Malyon, Alexandra, Frankau, Jude M., Parker, Richard A., Cohn, Simon, Laroche, Clare M., Palmer, Chris R., Fuld, Jonathan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070977
_version_ 1782282940148875264
author Fritz, Zoë
Malyon, Alexandra
Frankau, Jude M.
Parker, Richard A.
Cohn, Simon
Laroche, Clare M.
Palmer, Chris R.
Fuld, Jonathan P.
author_facet Fritz, Zoë
Malyon, Alexandra
Frankau, Jude M.
Parker, Richard A.
Cohn, Simon
Laroche, Clare M.
Palmer, Chris R.
Fuld, Jonathan P.
author_sort Fritz, Zoë
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine whether the introduction of the Universal Form of Treatment Options (the UFTO), as an alternative approach to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders, reduces harms in patients in whom a decision not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was made, and to understand the mechanism for any observed change. METHODS: A mixed-methods before-and-after study with contemporaneous case controls was conducted in an acute hospital. We examined DNACPR (103 patients with DNACPR orders in 530 admissions) and UFTO (118 decisions not to attempt resuscitation in 560 admissions) practice. The Global Trigger Tool was used to quantify harms. Qualitative interviews and observations were used to understand mechanisms and effects. RESULTS: Rate of harms in patients for whom there was a documented decision not to attempt CPR was reduced: Rate difference per 1000 patient-days was 12.9 (95% CI: 2.6–23.2, p-value = 0.01). There was a difference in the proportion of harms contributing to patient death in the two periods (23/71 in the DNACPR period to 4/44 in the UFTO period (95% CI 7.8–36.1, p-value = 0.006). Significant differences were maintained after adjustment for known confounders. No significant change was seen on contemporaneous case control wards. Interviews with clinicians and observation of ward practice revealed the UFTO helped provide clarity of goals of care and reduced negative associations with resuscitation decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing the UFTO was associated with a significant reduction in harmful events in patients in whom a decision not to attempt CPR had been made. Coupled with supportive qualitative evidence, this indicates the UFTO improved care for this vulnerable group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN85474986 UK Comprehensive Research Network Portfolio 7932
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3762818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37628182013-09-10 The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care Fritz, Zoë Malyon, Alexandra Frankau, Jude M. Parker, Richard A. Cohn, Simon Laroche, Clare M. Palmer, Chris R. Fuld, Jonathan P. PLoS One Research Article AIMS: To determine whether the introduction of the Universal Form of Treatment Options (the UFTO), as an alternative approach to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders, reduces harms in patients in whom a decision not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was made, and to understand the mechanism for any observed change. METHODS: A mixed-methods before-and-after study with contemporaneous case controls was conducted in an acute hospital. We examined DNACPR (103 patients with DNACPR orders in 530 admissions) and UFTO (118 decisions not to attempt resuscitation in 560 admissions) practice. The Global Trigger Tool was used to quantify harms. Qualitative interviews and observations were used to understand mechanisms and effects. RESULTS: Rate of harms in patients for whom there was a documented decision not to attempt CPR was reduced: Rate difference per 1000 patient-days was 12.9 (95% CI: 2.6–23.2, p-value = 0.01). There was a difference in the proportion of harms contributing to patient death in the two periods (23/71 in the DNACPR period to 4/44 in the UFTO period (95% CI 7.8–36.1, p-value = 0.006). Significant differences were maintained after adjustment for known confounders. No significant change was seen on contemporaneous case control wards. Interviews with clinicians and observation of ward practice revealed the UFTO helped provide clarity of goals of care and reduced negative associations with resuscitation decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing the UFTO was associated with a significant reduction in harmful events in patients in whom a decision not to attempt CPR had been made. Coupled with supportive qualitative evidence, this indicates the UFTO improved care for this vulnerable group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN85474986 UK Comprehensive Research Network Portfolio 7932 Public Library of Science 2013-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3762818/ /pubmed/24023718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070977 Text en © 2013 Fritz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fritz, Zoë
Malyon, Alexandra
Frankau, Jude M.
Parker, Richard A.
Cohn, Simon
Laroche, Clare M.
Palmer, Chris R.
Fuld, Jonathan P.
The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
title The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
title_full The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
title_fullStr The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
title_full_unstemmed The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
title_short The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
title_sort universal form of treatment options (ufto) as an alternative to do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (dnacpr) orders: a mixed methods evaluation of the effects on clinical practice and patient care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070977
work_keys_str_mv AT fritzzoe theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT malyonalexandra theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT frankaujudem theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT parkerricharda theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT cohnsimon theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT larocheclarem theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT palmerchrisr theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT fuldjonathanp theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT fritzzoe universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT malyonalexandra universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT frankaujudem universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT parkerricharda universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT cohnsimon universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT larocheclarem universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT palmerchrisr universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare
AT fuldjonathanp universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare