Cargando…
The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
AIMS: To determine whether the introduction of the Universal Form of Treatment Options (the UFTO), as an alternative approach to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders, reduces harms in patients in whom a decision not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was made, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070977 |
_version_ | 1782282940148875264 |
---|---|
author | Fritz, Zoë Malyon, Alexandra Frankau, Jude M. Parker, Richard A. Cohn, Simon Laroche, Clare M. Palmer, Chris R. Fuld, Jonathan P. |
author_facet | Fritz, Zoë Malyon, Alexandra Frankau, Jude M. Parker, Richard A. Cohn, Simon Laroche, Clare M. Palmer, Chris R. Fuld, Jonathan P. |
author_sort | Fritz, Zoë |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To determine whether the introduction of the Universal Form of Treatment Options (the UFTO), as an alternative approach to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders, reduces harms in patients in whom a decision not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was made, and to understand the mechanism for any observed change. METHODS: A mixed-methods before-and-after study with contemporaneous case controls was conducted in an acute hospital. We examined DNACPR (103 patients with DNACPR orders in 530 admissions) and UFTO (118 decisions not to attempt resuscitation in 560 admissions) practice. The Global Trigger Tool was used to quantify harms. Qualitative interviews and observations were used to understand mechanisms and effects. RESULTS: Rate of harms in patients for whom there was a documented decision not to attempt CPR was reduced: Rate difference per 1000 patient-days was 12.9 (95% CI: 2.6–23.2, p-value = 0.01). There was a difference in the proportion of harms contributing to patient death in the two periods (23/71 in the DNACPR period to 4/44 in the UFTO period (95% CI 7.8–36.1, p-value = 0.006). Significant differences were maintained after adjustment for known confounders. No significant change was seen on contemporaneous case control wards. Interviews with clinicians and observation of ward practice revealed the UFTO helped provide clarity of goals of care and reduced negative associations with resuscitation decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing the UFTO was associated with a significant reduction in harmful events in patients in whom a decision not to attempt CPR had been made. Coupled with supportive qualitative evidence, this indicates the UFTO improved care for this vulnerable group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN85474986 UK Comprehensive Research Network Portfolio 7932 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3762818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37628182013-09-10 The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care Fritz, Zoë Malyon, Alexandra Frankau, Jude M. Parker, Richard A. Cohn, Simon Laroche, Clare M. Palmer, Chris R. Fuld, Jonathan P. PLoS One Research Article AIMS: To determine whether the introduction of the Universal Form of Treatment Options (the UFTO), as an alternative approach to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders, reduces harms in patients in whom a decision not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was made, and to understand the mechanism for any observed change. METHODS: A mixed-methods before-and-after study with contemporaneous case controls was conducted in an acute hospital. We examined DNACPR (103 patients with DNACPR orders in 530 admissions) and UFTO (118 decisions not to attempt resuscitation in 560 admissions) practice. The Global Trigger Tool was used to quantify harms. Qualitative interviews and observations were used to understand mechanisms and effects. RESULTS: Rate of harms in patients for whom there was a documented decision not to attempt CPR was reduced: Rate difference per 1000 patient-days was 12.9 (95% CI: 2.6–23.2, p-value = 0.01). There was a difference in the proportion of harms contributing to patient death in the two periods (23/71 in the DNACPR period to 4/44 in the UFTO period (95% CI 7.8–36.1, p-value = 0.006). Significant differences were maintained after adjustment for known confounders. No significant change was seen on contemporaneous case control wards. Interviews with clinicians and observation of ward practice revealed the UFTO helped provide clarity of goals of care and reduced negative associations with resuscitation decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing the UFTO was associated with a significant reduction in harmful events in patients in whom a decision not to attempt CPR had been made. Coupled with supportive qualitative evidence, this indicates the UFTO improved care for this vulnerable group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN85474986 UK Comprehensive Research Network Portfolio 7932 Public Library of Science 2013-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3762818/ /pubmed/24023718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070977 Text en © 2013 Fritz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fritz, Zoë Malyon, Alexandra Frankau, Jude M. Parker, Richard A. Cohn, Simon Laroche, Clare M. Palmer, Chris R. Fuld, Jonathan P. The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care |
title | The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care |
title_full | The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care |
title_fullStr | The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care |
title_full_unstemmed | The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care |
title_short | The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an Alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) Orders: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Effects on Clinical Practice and Patient Care |
title_sort | universal form of treatment options (ufto) as an alternative to do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (dnacpr) orders: a mixed methods evaluation of the effects on clinical practice and patient care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24023718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fritzzoe theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT malyonalexandra theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT frankaujudem theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT parkerricharda theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT cohnsimon theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT larocheclarem theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT palmerchrisr theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT fuldjonathanp theuniversalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT fritzzoe universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT malyonalexandra universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT frankaujudem universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT parkerricharda universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT cohnsimon universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT larocheclarem universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT palmerchrisr universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare AT fuldjonathanp universalformoftreatmentoptionsuftoasanalternativetodonotattemptcardiopulmonaryresuscitationdnacprordersamixedmethodsevaluationoftheeffectsonclinicalpracticeandpatientcare |