Cargando…

Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review

Background: Results from animal toxicology studies are critical to evaluating the potential harm from exposure to environmental chemicals or the safety of drugs prior to human testing. However, there is significant debate about how to evaluate the methodology and potential biases of the animal studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Krauth, David, Woodruff, Tracey J., Bero, Lisa
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2013
Materias:	Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3764080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23771496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206389

Ejemplares similares

Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria: Krauth et al. Respond
por: Krauth, David, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods
por: Beck, Nancy B., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Erratum: “Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods”
Publicado: (2014)

The relationship between risk of bias criteria, research outcomes, and study sponsorship in a cohort of preclinical thiazolidinedione animal studies: a meta‐analysis
por: Abdel‐Sattar, M., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis
por: Anglemyer, Andrew T, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review
por: Chiu, Kellia, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Conrad and Becker’s “10 Criteria” Fall Short of Addressing Conflicts of Interest in Chemical Safety Studies
por: Sutton, Patrice, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals
por: Marušić, Marija Franka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Research: Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2017
por: Baasan, Odgerel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Devil they Knew: Chemical Documents Analysis of Industry Influence on PFAS Science
por: Gaber, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing
por: Krebs, Catharine E., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures
por: Bero, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Factors Associated with Findings of Published Trials of Drug–Drug Comparisons: Why Some Statins Appear More Efficacious than Others
por: Bero, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Conflicts of interest and critiques of the use of systematic reviews in policymaking: an analysis of opinion articles
por: Forsyth, Susan R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Bias Detection: Study Identifies Instruments for Evaluating Animal Studies
por: Betts, Kellyn S.
Publicado: (2013)

Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust
por: Bero, Lisa
Publicado: (2018)

An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review
por: Chambers, James D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of published assessment tools for comorbidity in liver transplantation: a systematic review protocol
por: Qu, Zhi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Nonindustry-Sponsored Preclinical Studies on Statins Yield Greater Efficacy Estimates Than Industry-Sponsored Studies: A Meta-Analysis
por: Krauth, David, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study
por: Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Standardised assessment of patients' capacity to manage medications: a systematic review of published instruments
por: Elliott, Rohan A, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Methodological Consequences of Situation Specificity: Biases in Assessments
por: Patry, Jean-Luc
Publicado: (2011)

The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes
por: Woodruff, Tracey J., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs
por: Rasmussen, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correction: An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review
por: Chambers, James D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews
por: Mandrioli, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Systematic and other reviews: Criteria and complexities
por: Sataloff, Robert T., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Systematic and other reviews: criteria and complexities
por: Sataloff, Robert T., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Correction: Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews
por: Mandrioli, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessment of risk of bias in randomized controlled trials published in Indian journals pertaining to pharmacology
por: Patil, Saurabh R, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study
por: Pincus, Tamar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
por: Rising, Kristin, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Assessments of risk of bias in systematic reviews of observational nutritional epidemiologic studies are often not appropriate or comprehensive: a methodological study
por: Zeraatkar, Dena, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals
por: Chess, Laura E, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Correction: Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
por: Rising, Kristin, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Authors’ rebuttal to Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) response to “Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools”
por: Eick, Stephanie M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports
por: Chang, Lee, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_8244te17eckd8vg1s6hjfae0se