Cargando…

Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform

This study aims at examining the clinical impact, of antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray format (LATM, One Lambda) in the absence of complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) positivity. All patients who underwent renal transplantation in 2007 and 2008 had their final pre-transplant ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chacko, M. P., Mathan, A., Daniel, D., Basu, G., Varughese, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3764709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049271
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.116303
_version_ 1782283178094886912
author Chacko, M. P.
Mathan, A.
Daniel, D.
Basu, G.
Varughese, S.
author_facet Chacko, M. P.
Mathan, A.
Daniel, D.
Basu, G.
Varughese, S.
author_sort Chacko, M. P.
collection PubMed
description This study aims at examining the clinical impact, of antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray format (LATM, One Lambda) in the absence of complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) positivity. All patients who underwent renal transplantation in 2007 and 2008 had their final pre-transplant sera retrospectively analyzed by the LATM assay. These patients were then followed-up with clinical, biochemical, and histopathological end points defined by elevation of serum creatinine and/or histopathological criteria. Among 164 patients who were studied, 149 received grafts from live related donors and 15, from deceased donors. 31 (19%) of the transplanted patients demonstrated pre-transplant anti-HLA IgG antibodies on the assay. Totally, 15 were positive for class I antibodies, 4 for class II antibodies, and 12 for both class I and class II antibodies. 44 patients (36%) experienced rejection. 8 out of 31 (26%) ELISA positive patients and 36 out of 133 (27%) ELISA negative patients experienced rejection. Among 15 patients who received deceased donor transplants, 4 were positive for ELISA, and 11 were negative. All 4 (100%) of the ELISA positive patients experienced rejection as compared to 3 out of 11 (27%) ELISA negative patients (P = 0.01). The ELISA LATM assay did not show any predictive value for rejection in our overall patient population; however, results in the specific setting of deceased donor transplants merit further exploration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3764709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37647092013-09-18 Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform Chacko, M. P. Mathan, A. Daniel, D. Basu, G. Varughese, S. Indian J Nephrol Original Article This study aims at examining the clinical impact, of antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray format (LATM, One Lambda) in the absence of complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) positivity. All patients who underwent renal transplantation in 2007 and 2008 had their final pre-transplant sera retrospectively analyzed by the LATM assay. These patients were then followed-up with clinical, biochemical, and histopathological end points defined by elevation of serum creatinine and/or histopathological criteria. Among 164 patients who were studied, 149 received grafts from live related donors and 15, from deceased donors. 31 (19%) of the transplanted patients demonstrated pre-transplant anti-HLA IgG antibodies on the assay. Totally, 15 were positive for class I antibodies, 4 for class II antibodies, and 12 for both class I and class II antibodies. 44 patients (36%) experienced rejection. 8 out of 31 (26%) ELISA positive patients and 36 out of 133 (27%) ELISA negative patients experienced rejection. Among 15 patients who received deceased donor transplants, 4 were positive for ELISA, and 11 were negative. All 4 (100%) of the ELISA positive patients experienced rejection as compared to 3 out of 11 (27%) ELISA negative patients (P = 0.01). The ELISA LATM assay did not show any predictive value for rejection in our overall patient population; however, results in the specific setting of deceased donor transplants merit further exploration. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3764709/ /pubmed/24049271 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.116303 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chacko, M. P.
Mathan, A.
Daniel, D.
Basu, G.
Varughese, S.
Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform
title Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform
title_full Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform
title_fullStr Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform
title_full_unstemmed Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform
title_short Significance of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies detected on an ELISA mixed antigen tray platform
title_sort significance of pre-transplant anti-hla antibodies detected on an elisa mixed antigen tray platform
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3764709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049271
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.116303
work_keys_str_mv AT chackomp significanceofpretransplantantihlaantibodiesdetectedonanelisamixedantigentrayplatform
AT mathana significanceofpretransplantantihlaantibodiesdetectedonanelisamixedantigentrayplatform
AT danield significanceofpretransplantantihlaantibodiesdetectedonanelisamixedantigentrayplatform
AT basug significanceofpretransplantantihlaantibodiesdetectedonanelisamixedantigentrayplatform
AT varugheses significanceofpretransplantantihlaantibodiesdetectedonanelisamixedantigentrayplatform