Cargando…

Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?

BACKGROUND: An arteriovenous fistula is the optimal form of vascular access in patients with end-stage renal failure requiring haemodialysis. Unfortunately, approximately one-third of fistulae fail at an early stage. Different anaesthetic techniques can influence factors associated with fistula succ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macfarlane, Alan James Robert, Kearns, Rachel Joyce, Aitken, Emma, Kinsella, John, Clancy, Marc James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-263
_version_ 1782283227082260480
author Macfarlane, Alan James Robert
Kearns, Rachel Joyce
Aitken, Emma
Kinsella, John
Clancy, Marc James
author_facet Macfarlane, Alan James Robert
Kearns, Rachel Joyce
Aitken, Emma
Kinsella, John
Clancy, Marc James
author_sort Macfarlane, Alan James Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An arteriovenous fistula is the optimal form of vascular access in patients with end-stage renal failure requiring haemodialysis. Unfortunately, approximately one-third of fistulae fail at an early stage. Different anaesthetic techniques can influence factors associated with fistula success, such as intraoperative blood flow and venous diameter. A regional anaesthetic brachial plexus block results in vasodilatation and improved short- and long-term fistula flow compared to the infiltration of local anaesthetic alone. This, however, has not yet been shown in a large trial to influence long-term fistula patency, the ultimate clinical measure of success. The aim of this study is to compare whether a regional anaesthetic block, compared to local anaesthetic infiltration, can improve long-term fistula patency. METHODS: This study is an observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Patients scheduled to undergo creation of either brachial or radial arteriovenous fistulae will receive a study information sheet, and consent will be obtained in keeping with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients will be randomised to receive either: (i) an ultrasound guided brachial plexus block using lignocaine with adrenaline and levobupivicaine, or (ii) local anaesthetic infiltration with lignocaine and levobupivicaine. A total of 126 patients will be recruited. The primary outcome is fistula primary patency at three months. Secondary outcomes include primary patency at 1 and 12 months, secondary patency and fistula flow at 1, 3 and 12 months, flow on first haemodialysis, procedural pain, patient satisfaction, change in cephalic vein diameter pre- and post-anaesthetic, change in radial or brachial artery flow pre- and post-anaesthetic, alteration of the surgical plan after anaesthesia as guided by vascular mapping with ultrasound, and fistula infection requiring antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: No large randomised controlled trial has examined the influence of brachial plexus block compared with local anaesthetic infiltration on the long-term patency of arteriovenous fistulae. If the performance of brachial plexus block increases fistulae patency, this will have significant clinical and financial benefits as the number of patients able to commence haemodialysis when planned should increase, and the number of “redo” or revision procedures should be reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 5 (reference no. 12/WS/0199) and is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov database (reference no. NCT01706354).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3765116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37651162013-09-07 Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation? Macfarlane, Alan James Robert Kearns, Rachel Joyce Aitken, Emma Kinsella, John Clancy, Marc James Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: An arteriovenous fistula is the optimal form of vascular access in patients with end-stage renal failure requiring haemodialysis. Unfortunately, approximately one-third of fistulae fail at an early stage. Different anaesthetic techniques can influence factors associated with fistula success, such as intraoperative blood flow and venous diameter. A regional anaesthetic brachial plexus block results in vasodilatation and improved short- and long-term fistula flow compared to the infiltration of local anaesthetic alone. This, however, has not yet been shown in a large trial to influence long-term fistula patency, the ultimate clinical measure of success. The aim of this study is to compare whether a regional anaesthetic block, compared to local anaesthetic infiltration, can improve long-term fistula patency. METHODS: This study is an observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Patients scheduled to undergo creation of either brachial or radial arteriovenous fistulae will receive a study information sheet, and consent will be obtained in keeping with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients will be randomised to receive either: (i) an ultrasound guided brachial plexus block using lignocaine with adrenaline and levobupivicaine, or (ii) local anaesthetic infiltration with lignocaine and levobupivicaine. A total of 126 patients will be recruited. The primary outcome is fistula primary patency at three months. Secondary outcomes include primary patency at 1 and 12 months, secondary patency and fistula flow at 1, 3 and 12 months, flow on first haemodialysis, procedural pain, patient satisfaction, change in cephalic vein diameter pre- and post-anaesthetic, change in radial or brachial artery flow pre- and post-anaesthetic, alteration of the surgical plan after anaesthesia as guided by vascular mapping with ultrasound, and fistula infection requiring antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: No large randomised controlled trial has examined the influence of brachial plexus block compared with local anaesthetic infiltration on the long-term patency of arteriovenous fistulae. If the performance of brachial plexus block increases fistulae patency, this will have significant clinical and financial benefits as the number of patients able to commence haemodialysis when planned should increase, and the number of “redo” or revision procedures should be reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 5 (reference no. 12/WS/0199) and is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov database (reference no. NCT01706354). BioMed Central 2013-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3765116/ /pubmed/23958289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-263 Text en Copyright © 2013 Macfarlane et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Macfarlane, Alan James Robert
Kearns, Rachel Joyce
Aitken, Emma
Kinsella, John
Clancy, Marc James
Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
title Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
title_full Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
title_fullStr Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
title_full_unstemmed Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
title_short Does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
title_sort does regional compared to local anaesthesia influence outcome after arteriovenous fistula creation?
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-263
work_keys_str_mv AT macfarlanealanjamesrobert doesregionalcomparedtolocalanaesthesiainfluenceoutcomeafterarteriovenousfistulacreation
AT kearnsracheljoyce doesregionalcomparedtolocalanaesthesiainfluenceoutcomeafterarteriovenousfistulacreation
AT aitkenemma doesregionalcomparedtolocalanaesthesiainfluenceoutcomeafterarteriovenousfistulacreation
AT kinsellajohn doesregionalcomparedtolocalanaesthesiainfluenceoutcomeafterarteriovenousfistulacreation
AT clancymarcjames doesregionalcomparedtolocalanaesthesiainfluenceoutcomeafterarteriovenousfistulacreation