Cargando…

Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND: Governments can intervene to change health-related behaviours using various measures but are sensitive to public attitudes towards such interventions. This review describes public attitudes towards a range of policy interventions aimed at changing tobacco and alcohol use, diet, and physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diepeveen, Stephanie, Ling, Tom, Suhrcke, Marc, Roland, Martin, Marteau, Theresa M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23947336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756
_version_ 1782283235795927040
author Diepeveen, Stephanie
Ling, Tom
Suhrcke, Marc
Roland, Martin
Marteau, Theresa M
author_facet Diepeveen, Stephanie
Ling, Tom
Suhrcke, Marc
Roland, Martin
Marteau, Theresa M
author_sort Diepeveen, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Governments can intervene to change health-related behaviours using various measures but are sensitive to public attitudes towards such interventions. This review describes public attitudes towards a range of policy interventions aimed at changing tobacco and alcohol use, diet, and physical activity, and the extent to which these attitudes vary with characteristics of (a) the targeted behaviour (b) the intervention and (c) the respondents. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and conducted a narrative synthesis of empirical studies that reported public attitudes in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand towards interventions relating to tobacco, alcohol, diet and physical activity. Two hundred studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Over half the studies (105/200, 53%) were conducted in North America, with the most common interventions relating to tobacco control (110/200, 55%), followed by alcohol (42/200, 21%), diet-related interventions (18/200, 9%), interventions targeting both diet and physical activity (18/200, 9%), and physical activity alone (3/200, 2%). Most studies used survey-based methods (160/200, 80%), and only ten used experimental designs. Acceptability varied as a function of: (a) the targeted behaviour, with more support observed for smoking-related interventions; (b) the type of intervention, with less intrusive interventions, those already implemented, and those targeting children and young people attracting most support; and (c) the characteristics of respondents, with support being highest in those not engaging in the targeted behaviour, and with women and older respondents being more likely to endorse more restrictive measures. CONCLUSIONS: Public acceptability of government interventions to change behaviour is greatest for the least intrusive interventions, which are often the least effective, and for interventions targeting the behaviour of others, rather than the respondent him or herself. Experimental studies are needed to assess how the presentation of the problem and the benefits of intervention might increase acceptability for those interventions which are more effective but currently less acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3765153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37651532013-09-07 Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis Diepeveen, Stephanie Ling, Tom Suhrcke, Marc Roland, Martin Marteau, Theresa M BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Governments can intervene to change health-related behaviours using various measures but are sensitive to public attitudes towards such interventions. This review describes public attitudes towards a range of policy interventions aimed at changing tobacco and alcohol use, diet, and physical activity, and the extent to which these attitudes vary with characteristics of (a) the targeted behaviour (b) the intervention and (c) the respondents. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and conducted a narrative synthesis of empirical studies that reported public attitudes in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand towards interventions relating to tobacco, alcohol, diet and physical activity. Two hundred studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Over half the studies (105/200, 53%) were conducted in North America, with the most common interventions relating to tobacco control (110/200, 55%), followed by alcohol (42/200, 21%), diet-related interventions (18/200, 9%), interventions targeting both diet and physical activity (18/200, 9%), and physical activity alone (3/200, 2%). Most studies used survey-based methods (160/200, 80%), and only ten used experimental designs. Acceptability varied as a function of: (a) the targeted behaviour, with more support observed for smoking-related interventions; (b) the type of intervention, with less intrusive interventions, those already implemented, and those targeting children and young people attracting most support; and (c) the characteristics of respondents, with support being highest in those not engaging in the targeted behaviour, and with women and older respondents being more likely to endorse more restrictive measures. CONCLUSIONS: Public acceptability of government interventions to change behaviour is greatest for the least intrusive interventions, which are often the least effective, and for interventions targeting the behaviour of others, rather than the respondent him or herself. Experimental studies are needed to assess how the presentation of the problem and the benefits of intervention might increase acceptability for those interventions which are more effective but currently less acceptable. BioMed Central 2013-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3765153/ /pubmed/23947336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756 Text en Copyright © 2013 Diepeveen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Diepeveen, Stephanie
Ling, Tom
Suhrcke, Marc
Roland, Martin
Marteau, Theresa M
Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_short Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_sort public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23947336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756
work_keys_str_mv AT diepeveenstephanie publicacceptabilityofgovernmentinterventiontochangehealthrelatedbehavioursasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT lingtom publicacceptabilityofgovernmentinterventiontochangehealthrelatedbehavioursasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT suhrckemarc publicacceptabilityofgovernmentinterventiontochangehealthrelatedbehavioursasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT rolandmartin publicacceptabilityofgovernmentinterventiontochangehealthrelatedbehavioursasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT marteautheresam publicacceptabilityofgovernmentinterventiontochangehealthrelatedbehavioursasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis