Cargando…
Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
BACKGROUND: The quality and safety of cell therapy products must be maintained throughout their production and quality control cycle, ensuring their final use in the patient. We validated the Lymulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test and immunophenotype according to International Conference on Harmonizati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23981284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-197 |
_version_ | 1782283315619823616 |
---|---|
author | Rustichelli, Deborah Castiglia, Sara Gunetti, Monica Mareschi, Katia Signorino, Elena Muraro, Michela Castello, Laura Sanavio, Fiorella Leone, Marco Ferrero, Ivana Fagioli, Franca |
author_facet | Rustichelli, Deborah Castiglia, Sara Gunetti, Monica Mareschi, Katia Signorino, Elena Muraro, Michela Castello, Laura Sanavio, Fiorella Leone, Marco Ferrero, Ivana Fagioli, Franca |
author_sort | Rustichelli, Deborah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quality and safety of cell therapy products must be maintained throughout their production and quality control cycle, ensuring their final use in the patient. We validated the Lymulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test and immunophenotype according to International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, considering accuracy, precision, repeatability, linearity and range. METHODS: For the endotoxin test we used a kinetic chromogenic LAL test. As this is a limit test for the control of impurities, in compliance with International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, we evaluated the specificity and detection limit. For the immunophenotype test, an identity test, we evaluated specificity through the Fluorescence Minus One method and we repeated all experiments thrice to verify precision. The immunophenotype validation required a performance qualification of the flow cytometer using two types of standard beads which have to be used daily to check cytometer reproducibly set up. The results were compared together. Collected data were statistically analyzed calculating mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation percentage (CV%). RESULTS: The LAL test is repeatable and specific. The spike recovery value of each sample was between 0.25 EU/ml and 1 EU/ml with a CV% < 10%. The correlation coefficient (≥ 0.980) and CV% (< 10%) of the standard curve tested in duplicate showed the test's linearity and a minimum detectable concentration value of 0.005 EU/ml. The immunophenotype method performed thrice on our cell therapy products is specific and repeatable as showed by CV% inter -experiment < 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that validated analytical procedures are suitable as quality controls for the batch release of cell therapy products. Our paper could offer an important contribution for the scientific community in the field of CTPs, above all to small Cell Factories such as ours, where it is not always possible to have CFR21 compliant software. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3765465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37654652013-09-08 Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach Rustichelli, Deborah Castiglia, Sara Gunetti, Monica Mareschi, Katia Signorino, Elena Muraro, Michela Castello, Laura Sanavio, Fiorella Leone, Marco Ferrero, Ivana Fagioli, Franca J Transl Med Methodology BACKGROUND: The quality and safety of cell therapy products must be maintained throughout their production and quality control cycle, ensuring their final use in the patient. We validated the Lymulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test and immunophenotype according to International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, considering accuracy, precision, repeatability, linearity and range. METHODS: For the endotoxin test we used a kinetic chromogenic LAL test. As this is a limit test for the control of impurities, in compliance with International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, we evaluated the specificity and detection limit. For the immunophenotype test, an identity test, we evaluated specificity through the Fluorescence Minus One method and we repeated all experiments thrice to verify precision. The immunophenotype validation required a performance qualification of the flow cytometer using two types of standard beads which have to be used daily to check cytometer reproducibly set up. The results were compared together. Collected data were statistically analyzed calculating mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation percentage (CV%). RESULTS: The LAL test is repeatable and specific. The spike recovery value of each sample was between 0.25 EU/ml and 1 EU/ml with a CV% < 10%. The correlation coefficient (≥ 0.980) and CV% (< 10%) of the standard curve tested in duplicate showed the test's linearity and a minimum detectable concentration value of 0.005 EU/ml. The immunophenotype method performed thrice on our cell therapy products is specific and repeatable as showed by CV% inter -experiment < 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that validated analytical procedures are suitable as quality controls for the batch release of cell therapy products. Our paper could offer an important contribution for the scientific community in the field of CTPs, above all to small Cell Factories such as ours, where it is not always possible to have CFR21 compliant software. BioMed Central 2013-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3765465/ /pubmed/23981284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-197 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rustichelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Rustichelli, Deborah Castiglia, Sara Gunetti, Monica Mareschi, Katia Signorino, Elena Muraro, Michela Castello, Laura Sanavio, Fiorella Leone, Marco Ferrero, Ivana Fagioli, Franca Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach |
title | Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach |
title_full | Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach |
title_fullStr | Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach |
title_short | Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach |
title_sort | validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23981284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rustichellideborah validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT castigliasara validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT gunettimonica validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT mareschikatia validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT signorinoelena validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT muraromichela validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT castellolaura validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT sanaviofiorella validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT leonemarco validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT ferreroivana validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach AT fagiolifranca validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach |