Cargando…

Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach

BACKGROUND: The quality and safety of cell therapy products must be maintained throughout their production and quality control cycle, ensuring their final use in the patient. We validated the Lymulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test and immunophenotype according to International Conference on Harmonizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rustichelli, Deborah, Castiglia, Sara, Gunetti, Monica, Mareschi, Katia, Signorino, Elena, Muraro, Michela, Castello, Laura, Sanavio, Fiorella, Leone, Marco, Ferrero, Ivana, Fagioli, Franca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23981284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-197
_version_ 1782283315619823616
author Rustichelli, Deborah
Castiglia, Sara
Gunetti, Monica
Mareschi, Katia
Signorino, Elena
Muraro, Michela
Castello, Laura
Sanavio, Fiorella
Leone, Marco
Ferrero, Ivana
Fagioli, Franca
author_facet Rustichelli, Deborah
Castiglia, Sara
Gunetti, Monica
Mareschi, Katia
Signorino, Elena
Muraro, Michela
Castello, Laura
Sanavio, Fiorella
Leone, Marco
Ferrero, Ivana
Fagioli, Franca
author_sort Rustichelli, Deborah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality and safety of cell therapy products must be maintained throughout their production and quality control cycle, ensuring their final use in the patient. We validated the Lymulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test and immunophenotype according to International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, considering accuracy, precision, repeatability, linearity and range. METHODS: For the endotoxin test we used a kinetic chromogenic LAL test. As this is a limit test for the control of impurities, in compliance with International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, we evaluated the specificity and detection limit. For the immunophenotype test, an identity test, we evaluated specificity through the Fluorescence Minus One method and we repeated all experiments thrice to verify precision. The immunophenotype validation required a performance qualification of the flow cytometer using two types of standard beads which have to be used daily to check cytometer reproducibly set up. The results were compared together. Collected data were statistically analyzed calculating mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation percentage (CV%). RESULTS: The LAL test is repeatable and specific. The spike recovery value of each sample was between 0.25 EU/ml and 1 EU/ml with a CV% < 10%. The correlation coefficient (≥ 0.980) and CV% (< 10%) of the standard curve tested in duplicate showed the test's linearity and a minimum detectable concentration value of 0.005 EU/ml. The immunophenotype method performed thrice on our cell therapy products is specific and repeatable as showed by CV% inter -experiment < 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that validated analytical procedures are suitable as quality controls for the batch release of cell therapy products. Our paper could offer an important contribution for the scientific community in the field of CTPs, above all to small Cell Factories such as ours, where it is not always possible to have CFR21 compliant software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3765465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37654652013-09-08 Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach Rustichelli, Deborah Castiglia, Sara Gunetti, Monica Mareschi, Katia Signorino, Elena Muraro, Michela Castello, Laura Sanavio, Fiorella Leone, Marco Ferrero, Ivana Fagioli, Franca J Transl Med Methodology BACKGROUND: The quality and safety of cell therapy products must be maintained throughout their production and quality control cycle, ensuring their final use in the patient. We validated the Lymulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test and immunophenotype according to International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, considering accuracy, precision, repeatability, linearity and range. METHODS: For the endotoxin test we used a kinetic chromogenic LAL test. As this is a limit test for the control of impurities, in compliance with International Conference on Harmonization Q2 Guidelines and the EU Pharmacopoeia, we evaluated the specificity and detection limit. For the immunophenotype test, an identity test, we evaluated specificity through the Fluorescence Minus One method and we repeated all experiments thrice to verify precision. The immunophenotype validation required a performance qualification of the flow cytometer using two types of standard beads which have to be used daily to check cytometer reproducibly set up. The results were compared together. Collected data were statistically analyzed calculating mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation percentage (CV%). RESULTS: The LAL test is repeatable and specific. The spike recovery value of each sample was between 0.25 EU/ml and 1 EU/ml with a CV% < 10%. The correlation coefficient (≥ 0.980) and CV% (< 10%) of the standard curve tested in duplicate showed the test's linearity and a minimum detectable concentration value of 0.005 EU/ml. The immunophenotype method performed thrice on our cell therapy products is specific and repeatable as showed by CV% inter -experiment < 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that validated analytical procedures are suitable as quality controls for the batch release of cell therapy products. Our paper could offer an important contribution for the scientific community in the field of CTPs, above all to small Cell Factories such as ours, where it is not always possible to have CFR21 compliant software. BioMed Central 2013-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3765465/ /pubmed/23981284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-197 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rustichelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Rustichelli, Deborah
Castiglia, Sara
Gunetti, Monica
Mareschi, Katia
Signorino, Elena
Muraro, Michela
Castello, Laura
Sanavio, Fiorella
Leone, Marco
Ferrero, Ivana
Fagioli, Franca
Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
title Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
title_full Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
title_fullStr Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
title_full_unstemmed Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
title_short Validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
title_sort validation of analytical methods in compliance with good manufacturing practice: a practical approach
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23981284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-197
work_keys_str_mv AT rustichellideborah validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT castigliasara validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT gunettimonica validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT mareschikatia validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT signorinoelena validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT muraromichela validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT castellolaura validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT sanaviofiorella validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT leonemarco validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT ferreroivana validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach
AT fagiolifranca validationofanalyticalmethodsincompliancewithgoodmanufacturingpracticeapracticalapproach