Cargando…

Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects

Recent nuclear accidents have prompted renewed interest in the fitness consequences of low-dose radiation. Hiyama et al. provided information on such effects in the Japanese pale grass blue butterfly in a paper that has been viewed more than 300,000 times, prompting a barrage of criticism. These exc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Møller, Anders Pape, Mousseau, Timothy Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-92
_version_ 1782283323861630976
author Møller, Anders Pape
Mousseau, Timothy Alexander
author_facet Møller, Anders Pape
Mousseau, Timothy Alexander
author_sort Møller, Anders Pape
collection PubMed
description Recent nuclear accidents have prompted renewed interest in the fitness consequences of low-dose radiation. Hiyama et al. provided information on such effects in the Japanese pale grass blue butterfly in a paper that has been viewed more than 300,000 times, prompting a barrage of criticism. These exchanges highlight the role of scrutiny in studies with potential effects on humans, but also raise questions about minimum requirements for demonstrating biological effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3765500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37655002013-09-08 Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects Møller, Anders Pape Mousseau, Timothy Alexander BMC Biol Comment Recent nuclear accidents have prompted renewed interest in the fitness consequences of low-dose radiation. Hiyama et al. provided information on such effects in the Japanese pale grass blue butterfly in a paper that has been viewed more than 300,000 times, prompting a barrage of criticism. These exchanges highlight the role of scrutiny in studies with potential effects on humans, but also raise questions about minimum requirements for demonstrating biological effects. BioMed Central 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3765500/ /pubmed/23987799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-92 Text en Copyright © 2013 Møller and Mousseau; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Comment
Møller, Anders Pape
Mousseau, Timothy Alexander
Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
title Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
title_full Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
title_fullStr Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
title_full_unstemmed Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
title_short Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
title_sort low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-92
work_keys_str_mv AT mølleranderspape lowdoseradiationscientificscrutinyandrequirementsfordemonstratingeffects
AT mousseautimothyalexander lowdoseradiationscientificscrutinyandrequirementsfordemonstratingeffects