Cargando…
Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects
Recent nuclear accidents have prompted renewed interest in the fitness consequences of low-dose radiation. Hiyama et al. provided information on such effects in the Japanese pale grass blue butterfly in a paper that has been viewed more than 300,000 times, prompting a barrage of criticism. These exc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-92 |
_version_ | 1782283323861630976 |
---|---|
author | Møller, Anders Pape Mousseau, Timothy Alexander |
author_facet | Møller, Anders Pape Mousseau, Timothy Alexander |
author_sort | Møller, Anders Pape |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent nuclear accidents have prompted renewed interest in the fitness consequences of low-dose radiation. Hiyama et al. provided information on such effects in the Japanese pale grass blue butterfly in a paper that has been viewed more than 300,000 times, prompting a barrage of criticism. These exchanges highlight the role of scrutiny in studies with potential effects on humans, but also raise questions about minimum requirements for demonstrating biological effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3765500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37655002013-09-08 Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects Møller, Anders Pape Mousseau, Timothy Alexander BMC Biol Comment Recent nuclear accidents have prompted renewed interest in the fitness consequences of low-dose radiation. Hiyama et al. provided information on such effects in the Japanese pale grass blue butterfly in a paper that has been viewed more than 300,000 times, prompting a barrage of criticism. These exchanges highlight the role of scrutiny in studies with potential effects on humans, but also raise questions about minimum requirements for demonstrating biological effects. BioMed Central 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3765500/ /pubmed/23987799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-92 Text en Copyright © 2013 Møller and Mousseau; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Comment Møller, Anders Pape Mousseau, Timothy Alexander Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects |
title | Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects |
title_full | Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects |
title_fullStr | Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects |
title_short | Low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects |
title_sort | low-dose radiation, scientific scrutiny, and requirements for demonstrating effects |
topic | Comment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-92 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mølleranderspape lowdoseradiationscientificscrutinyandrequirementsfordemonstratingeffects AT mousseautimothyalexander lowdoseradiationscientificscrutinyandrequirementsfordemonstratingeffects |