Cargando…

The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions

BACKGROUND: A composite biological structure, such as an insect head or abdomen, contains many internal structures with distinct functions. Composite structures are often used in RNA-seq studies, though it is unclear how expression of the same gene in different tissues and structures within the same...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Brian R, Atallah, Joel, Plachetzki, David C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23985010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-586
_version_ 1782283389523460096
author Johnson, Brian R
Atallah, Joel
Plachetzki, David C
author_facet Johnson, Brian R
Atallah, Joel
Plachetzki, David C
author_sort Johnson, Brian R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A composite biological structure, such as an insect head or abdomen, contains many internal structures with distinct functions. Composite structures are often used in RNA-seq studies, though it is unclear how expression of the same gene in different tissues and structures within the same structure affects the measurement (or even utility) of the resulting patterns of gene expression. Here we determine how complex composite tissue structure affects measures of gene expression using RNA-seq. RESULTS: We focus on two structures in the honey bee (the sting gland and digestive tract) both contained within one larger structure, the whole abdomen. For each of the three structures, we used RNA-seq to identify differentially expressed genes between two developmental stages, nurse bees and foragers. Based on RNA-seq for each structure-specific extraction, we found that RNA-seq with composite structures leads to many false negatives (genes strongly differentially expressed in particular structures which are not found to be differentially expressed within the composite structure). We also found a significant number of genes with one pattern of differential expression in the tissue-specific extraction, and the opposite in the composite extraction, suggesting multiple signals from such genes within the composite structure. We found these patterns for different classes of genes including transcription factors. CONCLUSIONS: Many RNA-seq studies currently use composite extractions, and even whole insect extractions, when tissue and structure specific extractions are possible. This is due to the logistical difficultly of micro-dissection and unawareness of the potential errors associated with composite extractions. The present study suggests that RNA-seq studies of composite structures are prone to false negatives and difficult to interpret positive signals for genes with variable patterns of local expression. In general, our results suggest that RNA-seq on large composite structures should be avoided unless it is possible to demonstrate that the effects shown here do not exist for the genes of interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3765781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37657812013-09-08 The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions Johnson, Brian R Atallah, Joel Plachetzki, David C BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: A composite biological structure, such as an insect head or abdomen, contains many internal structures with distinct functions. Composite structures are often used in RNA-seq studies, though it is unclear how expression of the same gene in different tissues and structures within the same structure affects the measurement (or even utility) of the resulting patterns of gene expression. Here we determine how complex composite tissue structure affects measures of gene expression using RNA-seq. RESULTS: We focus on two structures in the honey bee (the sting gland and digestive tract) both contained within one larger structure, the whole abdomen. For each of the three structures, we used RNA-seq to identify differentially expressed genes between two developmental stages, nurse bees and foragers. Based on RNA-seq for each structure-specific extraction, we found that RNA-seq with composite structures leads to many false negatives (genes strongly differentially expressed in particular structures which are not found to be differentially expressed within the composite structure). We also found a significant number of genes with one pattern of differential expression in the tissue-specific extraction, and the opposite in the composite extraction, suggesting multiple signals from such genes within the composite structure. We found these patterns for different classes of genes including transcription factors. CONCLUSIONS: Many RNA-seq studies currently use composite extractions, and even whole insect extractions, when tissue and structure specific extractions are possible. This is due to the logistical difficultly of micro-dissection and unawareness of the potential errors associated with composite extractions. The present study suggests that RNA-seq studies of composite structures are prone to false negatives and difficult to interpret positive signals for genes with variable patterns of local expression. In general, our results suggest that RNA-seq on large composite structures should be avoided unless it is possible to demonstrate that the effects shown here do not exist for the genes of interest. BioMed Central 2013-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3765781/ /pubmed/23985010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-586 Text en Copyright © 2013 Johnson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Brian R
Atallah, Joel
Plachetzki, David C
The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions
title The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions
title_full The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions
title_fullStr The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions
title_full_unstemmed The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions
title_short The importance of tissue specificity for RNA-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions
title_sort importance of tissue specificity for rna-seq: highlighting the errors of composite structure extractions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23985010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-586
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonbrianr theimportanceoftissuespecificityforrnaseqhighlightingtheerrorsofcompositestructureextractions
AT atallahjoel theimportanceoftissuespecificityforrnaseqhighlightingtheerrorsofcompositestructureextractions
AT plachetzkidavidc theimportanceoftissuespecificityforrnaseqhighlightingtheerrorsofcompositestructureextractions
AT johnsonbrianr importanceoftissuespecificityforrnaseqhighlightingtheerrorsofcompositestructureextractions
AT atallahjoel importanceoftissuespecificityforrnaseqhighlightingtheerrorsofcompositestructureextractions
AT plachetzkidavidc importanceoftissuespecificityforrnaseqhighlightingtheerrorsofcompositestructureextractions