Cargando…

Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Physical activity on prescription (PAP) is a successful intervention for increasing physical activity among patients with a sedentary lifestyle. The method seems to be sparsely used by general practitioners (GPs) and there is limited information about GPs’ attitudes to counselling using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persson, Gerthi, Brorsson, Annika, Ekvall Hansson, Eva, Troein, Margareta, Strandberg, Eva Lena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-128
_version_ 1782283412938162176
author Persson, Gerthi
Brorsson, Annika
Ekvall Hansson, Eva
Troein, Margareta
Strandberg, Eva Lena
author_facet Persson, Gerthi
Brorsson, Annika
Ekvall Hansson, Eva
Troein, Margareta
Strandberg, Eva Lena
author_sort Persson, Gerthi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity on prescription (PAP) is a successful intervention for increasing physical activity among patients with a sedentary lifestyle. The method seems to be sparsely used by general practitioners (GPs) and there is limited information about GPs’ attitudes to counselling using PAP as a tool. The aim of the study was to explore and understand the meaning of prescribing physical activity from the general practitioner’s perspective. METHODS: Three focus group interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 15 Swedish GPs in the south of Sweden. Participants were invited to talk about their experience of using PAP. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in four categories: The tradition makes it hard to change attitude, Shared responsibility is necessary, PAP has low status and is regarded with distrust and Lack of procedures and clear guidelines. Traditionally GPs talk with patients about the importance of an increased level of physical activity but they do not prescribe physical activity as a treatment. Physician’s education focuses on the use of pharmaceuticals. The responsibility for patients’ physical activity level is shared with other health professionals, the patient and society. The GPs express reservations about prescribing physical activity. A heavy workload is a source of frustration. PAP is regarded with distrust and considered to be a task of less value and status. Using a prescription to emphasize an increased level is considered to be redundant and the GPs think it should be administered by someone else in the health care system. Scepticism about the result of the method was also expressed. CONCLUSIONS: There is uncertainty about using PAP as a treatment since physicians lack education in non-pharmaceutical methods. The GPs do not regard the written referral as a prioritized task and rather refer to other professionals in the health care system to prescribe PAP. GPs pointed out a need to create routines and arrangements for the method to gain credibility and become everyday practice among GPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3765882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37658822013-09-08 Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study Persson, Gerthi Brorsson, Annika Ekvall Hansson, Eva Troein, Margareta Strandberg, Eva Lena BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical activity on prescription (PAP) is a successful intervention for increasing physical activity among patients with a sedentary lifestyle. The method seems to be sparsely used by general practitioners (GPs) and there is limited information about GPs’ attitudes to counselling using PAP as a tool. The aim of the study was to explore and understand the meaning of prescribing physical activity from the general practitioner’s perspective. METHODS: Three focus group interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 15 Swedish GPs in the south of Sweden. Participants were invited to talk about their experience of using PAP. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in four categories: The tradition makes it hard to change attitude, Shared responsibility is necessary, PAP has low status and is regarded with distrust and Lack of procedures and clear guidelines. Traditionally GPs talk with patients about the importance of an increased level of physical activity but they do not prescribe physical activity as a treatment. Physician’s education focuses on the use of pharmaceuticals. The responsibility for patients’ physical activity level is shared with other health professionals, the patient and society. The GPs express reservations about prescribing physical activity. A heavy workload is a source of frustration. PAP is regarded with distrust and considered to be a task of less value and status. Using a prescription to emphasize an increased level is considered to be redundant and the GPs think it should be administered by someone else in the health care system. Scepticism about the result of the method was also expressed. CONCLUSIONS: There is uncertainty about using PAP as a treatment since physicians lack education in non-pharmaceutical methods. The GPs do not regard the written referral as a prioritized task and rather refer to other professionals in the health care system to prescribe PAP. GPs pointed out a need to create routines and arrangements for the method to gain credibility and become everyday practice among GPs. BioMed Central 2013-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3765882/ /pubmed/23987804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-128 Text en Copyright © 2013 Persson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Persson, Gerthi
Brorsson, Annika
Ekvall Hansson, Eva
Troein, Margareta
Strandberg, Eva Lena
Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
title Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
title_full Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
title_short Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
title_sort physical activity on prescription (pap) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-128
work_keys_str_mv AT perssongerthi physicalactivityonprescriptionpapfromthegeneralpractitionersperspectiveaqualitativestudy
AT brorssonannika physicalactivityonprescriptionpapfromthegeneralpractitionersperspectiveaqualitativestudy
AT ekvallhanssoneva physicalactivityonprescriptionpapfromthegeneralpractitionersperspectiveaqualitativestudy
AT troeinmargareta physicalactivityonprescriptionpapfromthegeneralpractitionersperspectiveaqualitativestudy
AT strandbergevalena physicalactivityonprescriptionpapfromthegeneralpractitionersperspectiveaqualitativestudy