Cargando…
Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts
The Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis / Septic Shock (6S) trial showed that hydroxyethyl starch was harmful compared to Ringer’s acetate in patients with severe sepsis when used according to clinical practice and in alignment with the recommendations by the manufactures and authorities. The diff...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24128333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-66 |
_version_ | 1782283426802434048 |
---|---|
author | Haase, Nicolai Müller, Rasmus Perner, Anders |
author_facet | Haase, Nicolai Müller, Rasmus Perner, Anders |
author_sort | Haase, Nicolai |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis / Septic Shock (6S) trial showed that hydroxyethyl starch was harmful compared to Ringer’s acetate in patients with severe sepsis when used according to clinical practice and in alignment with the recommendations by the manufactures and authorities. The different interpretation by Chapell and Jacob’s rely on misreading of the trial publication and is not supported by the trial data. Several hypotheses may be made regarding less harmful ways of using HES in critically ill patients, but clinicians, guideline committee members and authorities need to acknowledge that such safer ways have not yet been identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3765941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37659412013-09-08 Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts Haase, Nicolai Müller, Rasmus Perner, Anders Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Letter to the Editor The Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis / Septic Shock (6S) trial showed that hydroxyethyl starch was harmful compared to Ringer’s acetate in patients with severe sepsis when used according to clinical practice and in alignment with the recommendations by the manufactures and authorities. The different interpretation by Chapell and Jacob’s rely on misreading of the trial publication and is not supported by the trial data. Several hypotheses may be made regarding less harmful ways of using HES in critically ill patients, but clinicians, guideline committee members and authorities need to acknowledge that such safer ways have not yet been identified. BioMed Central 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3765941/ /pubmed/24128333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-66 Text en Copyright © 2013 Haase et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor Haase, Nicolai Müller, Rasmus Perner, Anders Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts |
title | Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts |
title_full | Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts |
title_fullStr | Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts |
title_full_unstemmed | Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts |
title_short | Debate on HES safety is important, but must be based on facts |
title_sort | debate on hes safety is important, but must be based on facts |
topic | Letter to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24128333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-66 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haasenicolai debateonhessafetyisimportantbutmustbebasedonfacts AT mullerrasmus debateonhessafetyisimportantbutmustbebasedonfacts AT perneranders debateonhessafetyisimportantbutmustbebasedonfacts |