Cargando…

HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Most HIV prevention strategies assume beneficiaries can act on their prevention decisions. But some people are unable to do so. They are ‘choice-disabled’. Economic and educational interventions can reduce sexual violence, but there is less evidence that they can reduce HIV. There is lit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersson, Neil, Cockcroft, Anne, Thabane, Lehana, Marokoane, Nobantu, Laetsang, Ditiro, Masisi, Mokgweetsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-274
_version_ 1782283437981302784
author Andersson, Neil
Cockcroft, Anne
Thabane, Lehana
Marokoane, Nobantu
Laetsang, Ditiro
Masisi, Mokgweetsi
author_facet Andersson, Neil
Cockcroft, Anne
Thabane, Lehana
Marokoane, Nobantu
Laetsang, Ditiro
Masisi, Mokgweetsi
author_sort Andersson, Neil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most HIV prevention strategies assume beneficiaries can act on their prevention decisions. But some people are unable to do so. They are ‘choice-disabled’. Economic and educational interventions can reduce sexual violence, but there is less evidence that they can reduce HIV. There is little research on complex interventions in HIV prevention, yet all countries in southern Africa implement combination prevention programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective is to reduce HIV infections among women aged 15 to 29 years. Secondary objectives are reduction in gender violence and improvement in HIV-related knowledge, attitudes and practices among youth aged 15 to 29 years. A random sample of 77 census enumeration areas in three countries (Botswana, Namibia and Swaziland) was allocated randomly to three interventions, alone or in combination, in a factorial design stratified by country, HIV rates (above or below average for country), and urban/rural location. A baseline survey of youth aged 15 to 29 years provided cluster specific rates of HIV. All clusters continue existing prevention efforts and have a baseline and follow-up survey. Cluster is the unit of allocation, intervention and analysis, using generalised estimating equations, on an intention-to-treat basis. One intervention discusses evidence about choice disability with local HIV prevention services, to help them to serve the choice-disabled. Another discusses an eight-episode audio-docudrama with community groups, of all ages and both sexes, to generate endogenous strategies to reduce gender violence and develop an enabling environment. A third supports groups of women aged 18 to 25 years to build self-esteem and life skills and to set up small enterprises to generate income. A survey in all clusters after 3 years will measure outcomes, with interviewers unaware of group assignment of the clusters. The primary outcome is HIV infection in women aged 15 to 29 years. Secondary outcomes in youth aged 15 to 29 years are gender violence and protective knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, intention to change, agency, discussion of prevention and practices related to HIV and gender violence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ISRCTN28557578
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3765989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37659892013-09-08 HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Andersson, Neil Cockcroft, Anne Thabane, Lehana Marokoane, Nobantu Laetsang, Ditiro Masisi, Mokgweetsi Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Most HIV prevention strategies assume beneficiaries can act on their prevention decisions. But some people are unable to do so. They are ‘choice-disabled’. Economic and educational interventions can reduce sexual violence, but there is less evidence that they can reduce HIV. There is little research on complex interventions in HIV prevention, yet all countries in southern Africa implement combination prevention programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary objective is to reduce HIV infections among women aged 15 to 29 years. Secondary objectives are reduction in gender violence and improvement in HIV-related knowledge, attitudes and practices among youth aged 15 to 29 years. A random sample of 77 census enumeration areas in three countries (Botswana, Namibia and Swaziland) was allocated randomly to three interventions, alone or in combination, in a factorial design stratified by country, HIV rates (above or below average for country), and urban/rural location. A baseline survey of youth aged 15 to 29 years provided cluster specific rates of HIV. All clusters continue existing prevention efforts and have a baseline and follow-up survey. Cluster is the unit of allocation, intervention and analysis, using generalised estimating equations, on an intention-to-treat basis. One intervention discusses evidence about choice disability with local HIV prevention services, to help them to serve the choice-disabled. Another discusses an eight-episode audio-docudrama with community groups, of all ages and both sexes, to generate endogenous strategies to reduce gender violence and develop an enabling environment. A third supports groups of women aged 18 to 25 years to build self-esteem and life skills and to set up small enterprises to generate income. A survey in all clusters after 3 years will measure outcomes, with interviewers unaware of group assignment of the clusters. The primary outcome is HIV infection in women aged 15 to 29 years. Secondary outcomes in youth aged 15 to 29 years are gender violence and protective knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, intention to change, agency, discussion of prevention and practices related to HIV and gender violence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ISRCTN28557578 BioMed Central 2013-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3765989/ /pubmed/23987126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-274 Text en Copyright © 2013 Andersson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Andersson, Neil
Cockcroft, Anne
Thabane, Lehana
Marokoane, Nobantu
Laetsang, Ditiro
Masisi, Mokgweetsi
HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short HIV prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort hiv prevention in favour of the choice-disabled in southern africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23987126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-274
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonneil hivpreventioninfavourofthechoicedisabledinsouthernafricastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cockcroftanne hivpreventioninfavourofthechoicedisabledinsouthernafricastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thabanelehana hivpreventioninfavourofthechoicedisabledinsouthernafricastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marokoanenobantu hivpreventioninfavourofthechoicedisabledinsouthernafricastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT laetsangditiro hivpreventioninfavourofthechoicedisabledinsouthernafricastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT masisimokgweetsi hivpreventioninfavourofthechoicedisabledinsouthernafricastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial