Cargando…

Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal implants are occasionally removed due to infection or soft tissue irritation secondary to prominence. Several studies have reported loss of scoliotic curve correction after implant removal. However, further review of the literature reveals no similar cases of rapid curve p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotani, Toshiaki, Akazawa, Tsutomu, Lumawig, Jose MT, Sakuma, Tsuyoshi, Minami, Shohei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-8-15
_version_ 1782283489090994176
author Kotani, Toshiaki
Akazawa, Tsutomu
Lumawig, Jose MT
Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
Minami, Shohei
author_facet Kotani, Toshiaki
Akazawa, Tsutomu
Lumawig, Jose MT
Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
Minami, Shohei
author_sort Kotani, Toshiaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal implants are occasionally removed due to infection or soft tissue irritation secondary to prominence. Several studies have reported loss of scoliotic curve correction after implant removal. However, further review of the literature reveals no similar cases of rapid curve progression following implant removal in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) necessitating repeat posterior instrumented fusion. PURPOSE: To describe a 15-year-old female AIS patient treated by posterior instrumented fusion, who developed unusual rapid coronal and sagittal curve progression after implant removal. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: Retrospective case report. RESULTS: A 15-year-old female with Lenke type 1A AIS underwent a successful posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation. She initially had no complications after surgery, but three years after instrumentation, her implants were removed due to pain secondary to implant prominence. Fifteen months after removal, the main thoracic curve increased, compared with radiographs taken before removal, from 29° to 57°. This development required the patient to undergo additional surgery, which involved multiple osteotomies and posterior reinstrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: We must acknowledge that a remarkable amount of progression can occur rapidly following implant removal in scoliotic patients. Taking this into consideration,we need to carefully explain to patients that removal of their implants entails a risk of progressive deformity and that they need to follow-up with their physician after implant removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3766212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37662122013-09-08 Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report Kotani, Toshiaki Akazawa, Tsutomu Lumawig, Jose MT Sakuma, Tsuyoshi Minami, Shohei Scoliosis Case Report BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal implants are occasionally removed due to infection or soft tissue irritation secondary to prominence. Several studies have reported loss of scoliotic curve correction after implant removal. However, further review of the literature reveals no similar cases of rapid curve progression following implant removal in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) necessitating repeat posterior instrumented fusion. PURPOSE: To describe a 15-year-old female AIS patient treated by posterior instrumented fusion, who developed unusual rapid coronal and sagittal curve progression after implant removal. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: Retrospective case report. RESULTS: A 15-year-old female with Lenke type 1A AIS underwent a successful posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation. She initially had no complications after surgery, but three years after instrumentation, her implants were removed due to pain secondary to implant prominence. Fifteen months after removal, the main thoracic curve increased, compared with radiographs taken before removal, from 29° to 57°. This development required the patient to undergo additional surgery, which involved multiple osteotomies and posterior reinstrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: We must acknowledge that a remarkable amount of progression can occur rapidly following implant removal in scoliotic patients. Taking this into consideration,we need to carefully explain to patients that removal of their implants entails a risk of progressive deformity and that they need to follow-up with their physician after implant removal. BioMed Central 2013-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3766212/ /pubmed/24139161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-8-15 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kotani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kotani, Toshiaki
Akazawa, Tsutomu
Lumawig, Jose MT
Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
Minami, Shohei
Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
title Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
title_full Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
title_fullStr Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
title_short Reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
title_sort reinstrumentation for rapid curve progression after implant removal following posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-8-15
work_keys_str_mv AT kotanitoshiaki reinstrumentationforrapidcurveprogressionafterimplantremovalfollowingposteriorinstrumentedfusioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosisacasereport
AT akazawatsutomu reinstrumentationforrapidcurveprogressionafterimplantremovalfollowingposteriorinstrumentedfusioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosisacasereport
AT lumawigjosemt reinstrumentationforrapidcurveprogressionafterimplantremovalfollowingposteriorinstrumentedfusioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosisacasereport
AT sakumatsuyoshi reinstrumentationforrapidcurveprogressionafterimplantremovalfollowingposteriorinstrumentedfusioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosisacasereport
AT minamishohei reinstrumentationforrapidcurveprogressionafterimplantremovalfollowingposteriorinstrumentedfusioninadolescentidiopathicscoliosisacasereport