Cargando…
The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use
BACKGROUND: Electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) is a promising alternative to screening and brief intervention by health-care providers, but its efficacy in the hospital outpatient setting, which serves a large proportion of the population, has not been established. The aim of this s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-8-14 |
_version_ | 1782477310016880640 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Natalie A Kypri, Kypros Saunders, John B Saitz, Richard Attia, John Dunlop, Adrian Doran, Christopher McElduff, Patrick Wolfenden, Luke McCambridge, Jim |
author_facet | Johnson, Natalie A Kypri, Kypros Saunders, John B Saitz, Richard Attia, John Dunlop, Adrian Doran, Christopher McElduff, Patrick Wolfenden, Luke McCambridge, Jim |
author_sort | Johnson, Natalie A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) is a promising alternative to screening and brief intervention by health-care providers, but its efficacy in the hospital outpatient setting, which serves a large proportion of the population, has not been established. The aim of this study is to estimate the effect of e-SBI in hospital outpatients with hazardous or harmful drinking. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the outpatient department of a large tertiary referral hospital in Newcastle (population 540,000), Australia. Some 772 adults with appointments at a broad range of medical and surgical outpatient clinics who score 5–9 inclusive on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) subscale will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to electronic alcohol screening alone (control) or to e-SBI. As randomization will be effected by computer, researchers and participants (who will be invited to participate in a study of alcohol use over time) will be blinded to group assignment. The primary analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle and compare weekly volume (grams of alcohol) and the full AUDIT score with a six-month reference period between the groups six months post randomization. Secondary outcomes, assessed six and 12 months after randomization, will include drinking frequency, typical occasion quantity, proportion who report binge drinking, proportion who report heavy drinking, and health-care utilization. DISCUSSION: If e-SBI is efficacious in outpatient settings, it offers the prospect of systematically and sustainably reaching a large number of hazardous and harmful drinkers, many of whom do not otherwise seek or receive help. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000905864. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3766680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37666802013-09-09 The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use Johnson, Natalie A Kypri, Kypros Saunders, John B Saitz, Richard Attia, John Dunlop, Adrian Doran, Christopher McElduff, Patrick Wolfenden, Luke McCambridge, Jim Addict Sci Clin Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Electronic screening and brief intervention (e-SBI) is a promising alternative to screening and brief intervention by health-care providers, but its efficacy in the hospital outpatient setting, which serves a large proportion of the population, has not been established. The aim of this study is to estimate the effect of e-SBI in hospital outpatients with hazardous or harmful drinking. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the outpatient department of a large tertiary referral hospital in Newcastle (population 540,000), Australia. Some 772 adults with appointments at a broad range of medical and surgical outpatient clinics who score 5–9 inclusive on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) subscale will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to electronic alcohol screening alone (control) or to e-SBI. As randomization will be effected by computer, researchers and participants (who will be invited to participate in a study of alcohol use over time) will be blinded to group assignment. The primary analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle and compare weekly volume (grams of alcohol) and the full AUDIT score with a six-month reference period between the groups six months post randomization. Secondary outcomes, assessed six and 12 months after randomization, will include drinking frequency, typical occasion quantity, proportion who report binge drinking, proportion who report heavy drinking, and health-care utilization. DISCUSSION: If e-SBI is efficacious in outpatient settings, it offers the prospect of systematically and sustainably reaching a large number of hazardous and harmful drinkers, many of whom do not otherwise seek or receive help. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612000905864. BioMed Central 2013 2013-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3766680/ /pubmed/24004498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-8-14 Text en Copyright © 2013 Johnson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Johnson, Natalie A Kypri, Kypros Saunders, John B Saitz, Richard Attia, John Dunlop, Adrian Doran, Christopher McElduff, Patrick Wolfenden, Luke McCambridge, Jim The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use |
title | The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use |
title_full | The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use |
title_fullStr | The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use |
title_full_unstemmed | The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use |
title_short | The hospital outpatient alcohol project (HOAP): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use |
title_sort | hospital outpatient alcohol project (hoap): protocol for an individually randomized, parallel-group superiority trial of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention versus screening alone for unhealthy alcohol use |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-8-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonnataliea thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT kyprikypros thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT saundersjohnb thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT saitzrichard thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT attiajohn thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT dunlopadrian thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT doranchristopher thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT mcelduffpatrick thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT wolfendenluke thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT mccambridgejim thehospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT johnsonnataliea hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT kyprikypros hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT saundersjohnb hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT saitzrichard hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT attiajohn hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT dunlopadrian hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT doranchristopher hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT mcelduffpatrick hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT wolfendenluke hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse AT mccambridgejim hospitaloutpatientalcoholprojecthoapprotocolforanindividuallyrandomizedparallelgroupsuperioritytrialofelectronicalcoholscreeningandbriefinterventionversusscreeningaloneforunhealthyalcoholuse |