Cargando…

General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the most frequently used technique for lumbar spine disc surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome after GA and combined general/epidural anesthesia (CEG) in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khajavi, Mohammad Reza, Asadian, Mohammad Amir, Imani, Farsad, Etezadi, Farhad, Moharari, Reza Shariat, Amirjamshidi, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032080
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.116683
_version_ 1782477332638859264
author Khajavi, Mohammad Reza
Asadian, Mohammad Amir
Imani, Farsad
Etezadi, Farhad
Moharari, Reza Shariat
Amirjamshidi, Abbas
author_facet Khajavi, Mohammad Reza
Asadian, Mohammad Amir
Imani, Farsad
Etezadi, Farhad
Moharari, Reza Shariat
Amirjamshidi, Abbas
author_sort Khajavi, Mohammad Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the most frequently used technique for lumbar spine disc surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome after GA and combined general/epidural anesthesia (CEG) in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine disk surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent one or two level of laminectomy/discectomy during a 2 year period were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). They were randomly selected to undergo GA or CEG. The data recorded during surgery were: The patients’ heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), amount of blood loss, and the medication used during anesthesia. The severity of pain score, total analgesic consumption, and complications were recorded in the postoperative period. RESULTS: The MABP, HR, blood loss, and anesthetic medication were significantly lower in CEG group in comparison with that of GA group. In the postoperative period, the pain score and total analgesic requirement was lower in the CEG group and less complication were encountered in this group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed that CEG have some advantages over GA in reducing the blood loss and anesthetic medication during the operation and it is also more effective in control of pain with fewer complications during the postoperative period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3766856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37668562013-09-12 General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables Khajavi, Mohammad Reza Asadian, Mohammad Amir Imani, Farsad Etezadi, Farhad Moharari, Reza Shariat Amirjamshidi, Abbas Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the most frequently used technique for lumbar spine disc surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome after GA and combined general/epidural anesthesia (CEG) in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine disk surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent one or two level of laminectomy/discectomy during a 2 year period were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). They were randomly selected to undergo GA or CEG. The data recorded during surgery were: The patients’ heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), amount of blood loss, and the medication used during anesthesia. The severity of pain score, total analgesic consumption, and complications were recorded in the postoperative period. RESULTS: The MABP, HR, blood loss, and anesthetic medication were significantly lower in CEG group in comparison with that of GA group. In the postoperative period, the pain score and total analgesic requirement was lower in the CEG group and less complication were encountered in this group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed that CEG have some advantages over GA in reducing the blood loss and anesthetic medication during the operation and it is also more effective in control of pain with fewer complications during the postoperative period. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3766856/ /pubmed/24032080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.116683 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Khajavi MR http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khajavi, Mohammad Reza
Asadian, Mohammad Amir
Imani, Farsad
Etezadi, Farhad
Moharari, Reza Shariat
Amirjamshidi, Abbas
General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
title General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
title_full General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
title_fullStr General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
title_full_unstemmed General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
title_short General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
title_sort general anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: a randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032080
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.116683
work_keys_str_mv AT khajavimohammadreza generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables
AT asadianmohammadamir generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables
AT imanifarsad generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables
AT etezadifarhad generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables
AT mohararirezashariat generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables
AT amirjamshidiabbas generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables