Cargando…
General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables
BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the most frequently used technique for lumbar spine disc surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome after GA and combined general/epidural anesthesia (CEG) in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.116683 |
_version_ | 1782477332638859264 |
---|---|
author | Khajavi, Mohammad Reza Asadian, Mohammad Amir Imani, Farsad Etezadi, Farhad Moharari, Reza Shariat Amirjamshidi, Abbas |
author_facet | Khajavi, Mohammad Reza Asadian, Mohammad Amir Imani, Farsad Etezadi, Farhad Moharari, Reza Shariat Amirjamshidi, Abbas |
author_sort | Khajavi, Mohammad Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the most frequently used technique for lumbar spine disc surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome after GA and combined general/epidural anesthesia (CEG) in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine disk surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent one or two level of laminectomy/discectomy during a 2 year period were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). They were randomly selected to undergo GA or CEG. The data recorded during surgery were: The patients’ heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), amount of blood loss, and the medication used during anesthesia. The severity of pain score, total analgesic consumption, and complications were recorded in the postoperative period. RESULTS: The MABP, HR, blood loss, and anesthetic medication were significantly lower in CEG group in comparison with that of GA group. In the postoperative period, the pain score and total analgesic requirement was lower in the CEG group and less complication were encountered in this group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed that CEG have some advantages over GA in reducing the blood loss and anesthetic medication during the operation and it is also more effective in control of pain with fewer complications during the postoperative period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3766856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37668562013-09-12 General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables Khajavi, Mohammad Reza Asadian, Mohammad Amir Imani, Farsad Etezadi, Farhad Moharari, Reza Shariat Amirjamshidi, Abbas Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is the most frequently used technique for lumbar spine disc surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative variables and postoperative outcome after GA and combined general/epidural anesthesia (CEG) in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine disk surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent one or two level of laminectomy/discectomy during a 2 year period were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). They were randomly selected to undergo GA or CEG. The data recorded during surgery were: The patients’ heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), amount of blood loss, and the medication used during anesthesia. The severity of pain score, total analgesic consumption, and complications were recorded in the postoperative period. RESULTS: The MABP, HR, blood loss, and anesthetic medication were significantly lower in CEG group in comparison with that of GA group. In the postoperative period, the pain score and total analgesic requirement was lower in the CEG group and less complication were encountered in this group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed that CEG have some advantages over GA in reducing the blood loss and anesthetic medication during the operation and it is also more effective in control of pain with fewer complications during the postoperative period. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3766856/ /pubmed/24032080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.116683 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Khajavi MR http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khajavi, Mohammad Reza Asadian, Mohammad Amir Imani, Farsad Etezadi, Farhad Moharari, Reza Shariat Amirjamshidi, Abbas General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables |
title | General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables |
title_full | General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables |
title_fullStr | General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables |
title_full_unstemmed | General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables |
title_short | General anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables |
title_sort | general anesthesia versus combined epidural/general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine disc surgery: a randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of the two methods upon the outcome variables |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24032080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.116683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khajavimohammadreza generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables AT asadianmohammadamir generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables AT imanifarsad generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables AT etezadifarhad generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables AT mohararirezashariat generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables AT amirjamshidiabbas generalanesthesiaversuscombinedepiduralgeneralanesthesiaforelectivelumbarspinediscsurgeryarandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingtheimpactofthetwomethodsupontheoutcomevariables |