Cargando…

Strategies for Dealing with Missing Data in Clinical Trials: From Design to Analysis

Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard for evaluating interventions as randomized assignment equalizes known and unknown characteristics between intervention groups. However, when participants miss visits, the ability to conduct an intent-to-treat analysis and draw conclusions about a caus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Dziura, James D., Post, Lori A., Zhao, Qing, Fu, Zhixuan, Peduzzi, Peter
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	YJBM 2013
Materias:	Focus: Research and Clinical Ethics
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058309

Ejemplares similares

Home pregnancy tests for iPLEDGE: ethically dealing with potential falsifications
por: Schwartzman, Gabrielle, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Public involvement and engagement in big data research: protocol for a scoping review and a systematic review of delivery and effectiveness of strategies for involvement and engagement
por: Teodorowski, Piotr, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical trial transparency and data sharing among biopharmaceutical companies and the role of company size, location and product type: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis
por: Axson, Sydney A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions
por: Raza, M Zulfiqar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?
por: Fisher, Jill A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Data sharing in the age of predictive psychiatry: an adolescent perspective
por: Pavarini, Gabriela, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

TwiC or treat? Are trials within cohorts ethically defensible?
por: Weijer, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed
por: Nix, Hayden P, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers and Researchers on Research Priorities in Donation and Transplantation in Canada: A Pilot Workshop
por: Allard, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Informal professionalization of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials in Russia
por: Zvonareva, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Lived Experience Of Participants in an African RandomiseD trial (LEOPARD): protocol for an in-depth qualitative study within a multisite randomised controlled trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
por: Lawrence, David S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ethics and legal requirements for data linkage in 14 European countries for children with congenital anomalies
por: Claridge, Hugh, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
por: Monach, Paul A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
por: Kalkman, Shona, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Details of risk–benefit communication in informed consent documents for phase I/II trials
por: Kahrass, Hannes, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study
por: Morrow, Richard L, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa
por: Limaye, Dnyanesh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
por: Miller, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Protocol for a systematic scoping review of reasons given to justify the performance of randomised controlled trials
por: Dewar, Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

2533: Beyond “REACH”: The Research, Education, And Community Health (REACH) coalition as an exemplar for broad-based stakeholder engagement
por: Croisant, Sharon A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

An instrument for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures: development and testing
por: Spatz, Erica S, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Strzebonska, Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Developing an ethical framework-guided instrument for assessing bias in EHR-based Big Data studies: a research protocol
por: Qiao, Shan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Patient burden and clinical advances associated with postapproval monotherapy cancer drug trials: a retrospective cohort study
por: Carlisle, Benjamin Gregory, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rationalisations for women-only randomised controlled trials in conditions that affect both sexes: a scoping review protocol
por: Matthewson, Ainsley, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
por: Martani, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines
por: DiazOrdaz, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Improved parental understanding by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomized controlled study nested in a paediatric drug trial
por: Koonrungsesomboon, Nut, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012
por: Miller, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Money-oriented risk-takers or deliberate decision-makers: a cross-sectional survey study of participants in controlled human infection trials
por: Hoogerwerf, Marie-Astrid, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
por: Sweeney, Lorna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Best Case/Worst Case: protocol for a multisite randomised clinical trial of a scenario planning intervention for patients with kidney failure
por: Haug, Karlie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Introduction
por: Arojo, Omotooke
Publicado: (2013)

Parental Permission and Child Assent in Research on Children
por: Roth-Cline, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ic0h5lu6uej6luvveubileg28t