Cargando…
Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models
BACKGROUND: Both gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy (DS) have been widely used as bariatric surgeries, and DS appears to be superior to GB. The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms leading to body weight loss by comparing these two procedures in expe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24039816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072896 |
_version_ | 1782283684245667840 |
---|---|
author | Kodama, Yosuke Johannessen, Helene Furnes, Marianne W. Zhao, Chun-Mei Johnsen, Gjermund Mårvik, Ronald Kulseng, Bård Chen, Duan |
author_facet | Kodama, Yosuke Johannessen, Helene Furnes, Marianne W. Zhao, Chun-Mei Johnsen, Gjermund Mårvik, Ronald Kulseng, Bård Chen, Duan |
author_sort | Kodama, Yosuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy (DS) have been widely used as bariatric surgeries, and DS appears to be superior to GB. The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms leading to body weight loss by comparing these two procedures in experimental models of rats. METHODS: Animals were subjected to GB, DS or laparotomy (controls), and monitored by an open-circuit indirect calorimeter composed of comprehensive laboratory animal monitoring system and adiabatic bomb calorimeter. RESULTS: Body weight loss was greater after DS than GB. Food intake was reduced after DS but not GB. Energy expenditure was increased after either GB or DS. Fecal energy content was increased after DS but not GB. CONCLUSION: GB induced body weight loss by increasing energy expenditure, whereas DS induced greater body weight loss by reducing food intake, increasing energy expenditure and causing malabsorption in rat models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3767664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37676642013-09-13 Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models Kodama, Yosuke Johannessen, Helene Furnes, Marianne W. Zhao, Chun-Mei Johnsen, Gjermund Mårvik, Ronald Kulseng, Bård Chen, Duan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Both gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy (DS) have been widely used as bariatric surgeries, and DS appears to be superior to GB. The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms leading to body weight loss by comparing these two procedures in experimental models of rats. METHODS: Animals were subjected to GB, DS or laparotomy (controls), and monitored by an open-circuit indirect calorimeter composed of comprehensive laboratory animal monitoring system and adiabatic bomb calorimeter. RESULTS: Body weight loss was greater after DS than GB. Food intake was reduced after DS but not GB. Energy expenditure was increased after either GB or DS. Fecal energy content was increased after DS but not GB. CONCLUSION: GB induced body weight loss by increasing energy expenditure, whereas DS induced greater body weight loss by reducing food intake, increasing energy expenditure and causing malabsorption in rat models. Public Library of Science 2013-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3767664/ /pubmed/24039816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072896 Text en © 2013 Kodama et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kodama, Yosuke Johannessen, Helene Furnes, Marianne W. Zhao, Chun-Mei Johnsen, Gjermund Mårvik, Ronald Kulseng, Bård Chen, Duan Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models |
title | Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models |
title_full | Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models |
title_fullStr | Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models |
title_short | Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models |
title_sort | mechanistic comparison between gastric bypass vs. duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy in rat models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24039816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kodamayosuke mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels AT johannessenhelene mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels AT furnesmariannew mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels AT zhaochunmei mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels AT johnsengjermund mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels AT marvikronald mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels AT kulsengbard mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels AT chenduan mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels |