Cargando…

Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models

BACKGROUND: Both gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy (DS) have been widely used as bariatric surgeries, and DS appears to be superior to GB. The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms leading to body weight loss by comparing these two procedures in expe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodama, Yosuke, Johannessen, Helene, Furnes, Marianne W., Zhao, Chun-Mei, Johnsen, Gjermund, Mårvik, Ronald, Kulseng, Bård, Chen, Duan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24039816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072896
_version_ 1782283684245667840
author Kodama, Yosuke
Johannessen, Helene
Furnes, Marianne W.
Zhao, Chun-Mei
Johnsen, Gjermund
Mårvik, Ronald
Kulseng, Bård
Chen, Duan
author_facet Kodama, Yosuke
Johannessen, Helene
Furnes, Marianne W.
Zhao, Chun-Mei
Johnsen, Gjermund
Mårvik, Ronald
Kulseng, Bård
Chen, Duan
author_sort Kodama, Yosuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy (DS) have been widely used as bariatric surgeries, and DS appears to be superior to GB. The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms leading to body weight loss by comparing these two procedures in experimental models of rats. METHODS: Animals were subjected to GB, DS or laparotomy (controls), and monitored by an open-circuit indirect calorimeter composed of comprehensive laboratory animal monitoring system and adiabatic bomb calorimeter. RESULTS: Body weight loss was greater after DS than GB. Food intake was reduced after DS but not GB. Energy expenditure was increased after either GB or DS. Fecal energy content was increased after DS but not GB. CONCLUSION: GB induced body weight loss by increasing energy expenditure, whereas DS induced greater body weight loss by reducing food intake, increasing energy expenditure and causing malabsorption in rat models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3767664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37676642013-09-13 Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models Kodama, Yosuke Johannessen, Helene Furnes, Marianne W. Zhao, Chun-Mei Johnsen, Gjermund Mårvik, Ronald Kulseng, Bård Chen, Duan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Both gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy (DS) have been widely used as bariatric surgeries, and DS appears to be superior to GB. The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms leading to body weight loss by comparing these two procedures in experimental models of rats. METHODS: Animals were subjected to GB, DS or laparotomy (controls), and monitored by an open-circuit indirect calorimeter composed of comprehensive laboratory animal monitoring system and adiabatic bomb calorimeter. RESULTS: Body weight loss was greater after DS than GB. Food intake was reduced after DS but not GB. Energy expenditure was increased after either GB or DS. Fecal energy content was increased after DS but not GB. CONCLUSION: GB induced body weight loss by increasing energy expenditure, whereas DS induced greater body weight loss by reducing food intake, increasing energy expenditure and causing malabsorption in rat models. Public Library of Science 2013-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3767664/ /pubmed/24039816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072896 Text en © 2013 Kodama et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kodama, Yosuke
Johannessen, Helene
Furnes, Marianne W.
Zhao, Chun-Mei
Johnsen, Gjermund
Mårvik, Ronald
Kulseng, Bård
Chen, Duan
Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models
title Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models
title_full Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models
title_fullStr Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models
title_short Mechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Models
title_sort mechanistic comparison between gastric bypass vs. duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy in rat models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24039816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072896
work_keys_str_mv AT kodamayosuke mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels
AT johannessenhelene mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels
AT furnesmariannew mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels
AT zhaochunmei mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels
AT johnsengjermund mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels
AT marvikronald mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels
AT kulsengbard mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels
AT chenduan mechanisticcomparisonbetweengastricbypassvsduodenalswitchwithsleevegastrectomyinratmodels