Cargando…
Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions
BACKGROUND: Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) has been proven to be superior to T2*-weighted imaging and also other existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for the detection of iron content and hemorrhage in the brain. The purpose of this study was to compare SWI with T1WI, T2WI and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24040004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073626 |
_version_ | 1782283699496157184 |
---|---|
author | Li, Chuanming Zhou, Daiquan Zhao, Jun Wang, Xin Mu, Wei Wang, Jian |
author_facet | Li, Chuanming Zhou, Daiquan Zhao, Jun Wang, Xin Mu, Wei Wang, Jian |
author_sort | Li, Chuanming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) has been proven to be superior to T2*-weighted imaging and also other existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for the detection of iron content and hemorrhage in the brain. The purpose of this study was to compare SWI with T1WI, T2WI and T2*WI in detecting splenic siderotic lesions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Twenty-two patients with splenic siderotic nodule were imaged with non-contrast MRI T1WI, T2WI, T2*WI and SWI at 3.0 Tesla. Imaging data were independently analyzed by two experienced radiologists. The number of splenic siderotic nodules was counted, and the size (largest diameter) was measured. The conspicuity was calculated as the nodule to background parenchyma intensity ratio. We found that SWI detected a larger average number of splenic siderotic nodules than T1WI, T2WI, or T2*WI (all P<0.05). The average size of the nodules detected by SWI was larger than that of those detected by T1WI, T2WI or T2*WI (all P<0.05). SWI provided superior contrast and visibility for splenic siderotic nodules compared to any other sequence (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SWI may be a better detection scheme for splenic siderotic nodules than T1WI, T2WI and T2*WI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3767753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37677532013-09-13 Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions Li, Chuanming Zhou, Daiquan Zhao, Jun Wang, Xin Mu, Wei Wang, Jian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) has been proven to be superior to T2*-weighted imaging and also other existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques for the detection of iron content and hemorrhage in the brain. The purpose of this study was to compare SWI with T1WI, T2WI and T2*WI in detecting splenic siderotic lesions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Twenty-two patients with splenic siderotic nodule were imaged with non-contrast MRI T1WI, T2WI, T2*WI and SWI at 3.0 Tesla. Imaging data were independently analyzed by two experienced radiologists. The number of splenic siderotic nodules was counted, and the size (largest diameter) was measured. The conspicuity was calculated as the nodule to background parenchyma intensity ratio. We found that SWI detected a larger average number of splenic siderotic nodules than T1WI, T2WI, or T2*WI (all P<0.05). The average size of the nodules detected by SWI was larger than that of those detected by T1WI, T2WI or T2*WI (all P<0.05). SWI provided superior contrast and visibility for splenic siderotic nodules compared to any other sequence (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SWI may be a better detection scheme for splenic siderotic nodules than T1WI, T2WI and T2*WI. Public Library of Science 2013-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3767753/ /pubmed/24040004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073626 Text en © 2013 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Chuanming Zhou, Daiquan Zhao, Jun Wang, Xin Mu, Wei Wang, Jian Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions |
title | Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions |
title_full | Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions |
title_fullStr | Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions |
title_short | Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging versus Other Imaging Modalities in Detecting Splenic Siderotic Lesions |
title_sort | magnetic resonance susceptibility-weighted imaging versus other imaging modalities in detecting splenic siderotic lesions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24040004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichuanming magneticresonancesusceptibilityweightedimagingversusotherimagingmodalitiesindetectingsplenicsideroticlesions AT zhoudaiquan magneticresonancesusceptibilityweightedimagingversusotherimagingmodalitiesindetectingsplenicsideroticlesions AT zhaojun magneticresonancesusceptibilityweightedimagingversusotherimagingmodalitiesindetectingsplenicsideroticlesions AT wangxin magneticresonancesusceptibilityweightedimagingversusotherimagingmodalitiesindetectingsplenicsideroticlesions AT muwei magneticresonancesusceptibilityweightedimagingversusotherimagingmodalitiesindetectingsplenicsideroticlesions AT wangjian magneticresonancesusceptibilityweightedimagingversusotherimagingmodalitiesindetectingsplenicsideroticlesions |