Cargando…

The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women

BACKGROUND: Excess accumulation of visceral fat is a prominent risk factor for cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity. While computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard to measure visceral adiposity, this is often not possible for large studies - thus valid, but less expensive and intrusive proxy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Direk, Kenan, Cecelja, Marina, Astle, William, Chowienczyk, Phil, Spector, Tim D, Falchi, Mario, Andrew, Toby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23552273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-25
_version_ 1782283939025518592
author Direk, Kenan
Cecelja, Marina
Astle, William
Chowienczyk, Phil
Spector, Tim D
Falchi, Mario
Andrew, Toby
author_facet Direk, Kenan
Cecelja, Marina
Astle, William
Chowienczyk, Phil
Spector, Tim D
Falchi, Mario
Andrew, Toby
author_sort Direk, Kenan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Excess accumulation of visceral fat is a prominent risk factor for cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity. While computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard to measure visceral adiposity, this is often not possible for large studies - thus valid, but less expensive and intrusive proxy measures of visceral fat are required such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Study aims were to a) identify a valid DXA-based measure of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), b) estimate VAT heritability and c) assess visceral fat association with morbidity in relation to body fat distribution. METHODS: A validation sample of 54 females measured for detailed body fat composition - assessed using CT, DXA and anthropometry – was used to evaluate previously published predictive models of CT-measured visceral fat. Based upon a validated model, we realised an out-of-sample estimate of abdominal VAT area for a study sample of 3457 female volunteer twins and estimated VAT area heritability using a classical twin study design. Regression and residuals analyses were used to assess the relationship between adiposity and morbidity. RESULTS: Published models applied to the validation sample explained >80% of the variance in CT-measured visceral fat. While CT visceral fat was best estimated using a linear regression for waist circumference, CT body cavity area and total abdominal fat (R(2) = 0.91), anthropometric measures alone predicted VAT almost equally well (CT body cavity area and waist circumference, R(2) = 0.86). Narrow sense VAT area heritability for the study sample was estimated to be 58% (95% CI: 51-66%) with a shared familial component of 24% (17-30%). VAT area is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension (HT), subclinical atherosclerosis and liver function tests. In particular, VAT area is associated with T2D, HT and liver function (alanine transaminase) independent of DXA total abdominal fat and body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSIONS: DXA and anthropometric measures can be utilised to derive estimates of visceral fat as a reliable alternative to CT. Visceral fat is heritable and appears to mediate the association between body adiposity and morbidity. This observation is consistent with hypotheses that suggest excess visceral adiposity is causally related to cardiovascular and metabolic disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3769144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37691442013-09-11 The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women Direk, Kenan Cecelja, Marina Astle, William Chowienczyk, Phil Spector, Tim D Falchi, Mario Andrew, Toby BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Excess accumulation of visceral fat is a prominent risk factor for cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity. While computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard to measure visceral adiposity, this is often not possible for large studies - thus valid, but less expensive and intrusive proxy measures of visceral fat are required such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Study aims were to a) identify a valid DXA-based measure of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), b) estimate VAT heritability and c) assess visceral fat association with morbidity in relation to body fat distribution. METHODS: A validation sample of 54 females measured for detailed body fat composition - assessed using CT, DXA and anthropometry – was used to evaluate previously published predictive models of CT-measured visceral fat. Based upon a validated model, we realised an out-of-sample estimate of abdominal VAT area for a study sample of 3457 female volunteer twins and estimated VAT area heritability using a classical twin study design. Regression and residuals analyses were used to assess the relationship between adiposity and morbidity. RESULTS: Published models applied to the validation sample explained >80% of the variance in CT-measured visceral fat. While CT visceral fat was best estimated using a linear regression for waist circumference, CT body cavity area and total abdominal fat (R(2) = 0.91), anthropometric measures alone predicted VAT almost equally well (CT body cavity area and waist circumference, R(2) = 0.86). Narrow sense VAT area heritability for the study sample was estimated to be 58% (95% CI: 51-66%) with a shared familial component of 24% (17-30%). VAT area is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension (HT), subclinical atherosclerosis and liver function tests. In particular, VAT area is associated with T2D, HT and liver function (alanine transaminase) independent of DXA total abdominal fat and body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSIONS: DXA and anthropometric measures can be utilised to derive estimates of visceral fat as a reliable alternative to CT. Visceral fat is heritable and appears to mediate the association between body adiposity and morbidity. This observation is consistent with hypotheses that suggest excess visceral adiposity is causally related to cardiovascular and metabolic disease. BioMed Central 2013-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3769144/ /pubmed/23552273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-25 Text en Copyright © 2013 Direk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Direk, Kenan
Cecelja, Marina
Astle, William
Chowienczyk, Phil
Spector, Tim D
Falchi, Mario
Andrew, Toby
The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women
title The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women
title_full The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women
title_fullStr The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women
title_short The relationship between DXA-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women
title_sort relationship between dxa-based and anthropometric measures of visceral fat and morbidity in women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23552273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-25
work_keys_str_mv AT direkkenan therelationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT ceceljamarina therelationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT astlewilliam therelationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT chowienczykphil therelationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT spectortimd therelationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT falchimario therelationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT andrewtoby therelationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT direkkenan relationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT ceceljamarina relationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT astlewilliam relationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT chowienczykphil relationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT spectortimd relationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT falchimario relationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen
AT andrewtoby relationshipbetweendxabasedandanthropometricmeasuresofvisceralfatandmorbidityinwomen