Cargando…

Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding

Genetic modifications of trees may provide many benefits, e.g. increase production, and mitigate climate change and herbivore impacts on forests. However, genetic modifications sometimes result in unintended effects on innate traits involved in plant-herbivore interactions. The importance of intenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hjältén, Joakim, Axelsson, E. Petter, Julkunen-Tiitto, Riitta, Wennström, Anders, Pilate, Gilles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24040084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073819
_version_ 1782283977272328192
author Hjältén, Joakim
Axelsson, E. Petter
Julkunen-Tiitto, Riitta
Wennström, Anders
Pilate, Gilles
author_facet Hjältén, Joakim
Axelsson, E. Petter
Julkunen-Tiitto, Riitta
Wennström, Anders
Pilate, Gilles
author_sort Hjältén, Joakim
collection PubMed
description Genetic modifications of trees may provide many benefits, e.g. increase production, and mitigate climate change and herbivore impacts on forests. However, genetic modifications sometimes result in unintended effects on innate traits involved in plant-herbivore interactions. The importance of intentional changes in plant defence relative to unintentional changes and the natural variation among clones used in forestry has not been evaluated. By a combination of biochemical measurements and bioassays we investigated if insect feeding on GM aspens is more affected by intentional (induction Bt toxins) than of unintentional, non-target changes or clonal differences in innate plant defence. We used two hybrid wildtype clones (Populus tremula x P. tremuloides and Populus tremula x P. alba) of aspen that have been genetically modified for 1) insect resistance (two Bt lines) or 2) reduced lignin properties (two lines COMT and CAD), respectively. Our measurements of biochemical properties suggest that unintended changes by GM modifications (occurring due to events in the transformation process) in innate plant defence (phenolic compounds) were generally smaller but fundamentally different than differences seen among different wildtype clones (e.g. quantitative and qualitative, respectively). However, neither clonal differences between the two wildtype clones nor unintended changes in phytochemistry influenced consumption by the leaf beetle (Phratora vitellinae). By contrast, Bt induction had a strong direct intended effect as well as a post experiment effect on leaf beetle consumption. The latter suggested lasting reduction of beetle fitness following Bt exposure that is likely due to intestinal damage suffered by the initial Bt exposure. We conclude that Bt induction clearly have intended effects on a target species. Furthermore, the effect of unintended changes in innate plant defence traits, when they occur, are context dependent and have in comparison to Bt induction probably less pronounced effect on targeted herbivores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3769380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37693802013-09-13 Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding Hjältén, Joakim Axelsson, E. Petter Julkunen-Tiitto, Riitta Wennström, Anders Pilate, Gilles PLoS One Research Article Genetic modifications of trees may provide many benefits, e.g. increase production, and mitigate climate change and herbivore impacts on forests. However, genetic modifications sometimes result in unintended effects on innate traits involved in plant-herbivore interactions. The importance of intentional changes in plant defence relative to unintentional changes and the natural variation among clones used in forestry has not been evaluated. By a combination of biochemical measurements and bioassays we investigated if insect feeding on GM aspens is more affected by intentional (induction Bt toxins) than of unintentional, non-target changes or clonal differences in innate plant defence. We used two hybrid wildtype clones (Populus tremula x P. tremuloides and Populus tremula x P. alba) of aspen that have been genetically modified for 1) insect resistance (two Bt lines) or 2) reduced lignin properties (two lines COMT and CAD), respectively. Our measurements of biochemical properties suggest that unintended changes by GM modifications (occurring due to events in the transformation process) in innate plant defence (phenolic compounds) were generally smaller but fundamentally different than differences seen among different wildtype clones (e.g. quantitative and qualitative, respectively). However, neither clonal differences between the two wildtype clones nor unintended changes in phytochemistry influenced consumption by the leaf beetle (Phratora vitellinae). By contrast, Bt induction had a strong direct intended effect as well as a post experiment effect on leaf beetle consumption. The latter suggested lasting reduction of beetle fitness following Bt exposure that is likely due to intestinal damage suffered by the initial Bt exposure. We conclude that Bt induction clearly have intended effects on a target species. Furthermore, the effect of unintended changes in innate plant defence traits, when they occur, are context dependent and have in comparison to Bt induction probably less pronounced effect on targeted herbivores. Public Library of Science 2013-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3769380/ /pubmed/24040084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073819 Text en © 2013 Hjältén et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hjältén, Joakim
Axelsson, E. Petter
Julkunen-Tiitto, Riitta
Wennström, Anders
Pilate, Gilles
Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding
title Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding
title_full Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding
title_fullStr Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding
title_full_unstemmed Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding
title_short Innate and Introduced Resistance Traits in Genetically Modified Aspen Trees and Their Effect on Leaf Beetle Feeding
title_sort innate and introduced resistance traits in genetically modified aspen trees and their effect on leaf beetle feeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24040084
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073819
work_keys_str_mv AT hjaltenjoakim innateandintroducedresistancetraitsingeneticallymodifiedaspentreesandtheireffectonleafbeetlefeeding
AT axelssonepetter innateandintroducedresistancetraitsingeneticallymodifiedaspentreesandtheireffectonleafbeetlefeeding
AT julkunentiittoriitta innateandintroducedresistancetraitsingeneticallymodifiedaspentreesandtheireffectonleafbeetlefeeding
AT wennstromanders innateandintroducedresistancetraitsingeneticallymodifiedaspentreesandtheireffectonleafbeetlefeeding
AT pilategilles innateandintroducedresistancetraitsingeneticallymodifiedaspentreesandtheireffectonleafbeetlefeeding