Cargando…
Interactions between photodegradation components
BACKGROUND: The interactions of p-cresol photocatalytic degradation components were studied by response surface methodology. The study was designed by central composite design using the irradiation time, pH, the amount of photocatalyst and the p-cresol concentration as variables. The design was perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3770455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22967885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-100 |
_version_ | 1782284092971155456 |
---|---|
author | Abdollahi, Yadollah Zakaria, Azmi Matori, Khamirul Amin Shameli, Kamyar Jahangirian, Hossein Rezayi, Majid Abdollahi, Tahereh |
author_facet | Abdollahi, Yadollah Zakaria, Azmi Matori, Khamirul Amin Shameli, Kamyar Jahangirian, Hossein Rezayi, Majid Abdollahi, Tahereh |
author_sort | Abdollahi, Yadollah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The interactions of p-cresol photocatalytic degradation components were studied by response surface methodology. The study was designed by central composite design using the irradiation time, pH, the amount of photocatalyst and the p-cresol concentration as variables. The design was performed to obtain photodegradation % as actual responses. The actual responses were fitted with linear, two factor interactions, cubic and quadratic model to select an appropriate model. The selected model was validated by analysis of variance which provided evidences such as high F-value (845.09), very low P-value (<.0.0001), non-significant lack of fit, the coefficient of R-squared (R(2) = 0.999), adjusted R-squared (R(adj)(2) = 0.998), predicted R-squared (R(pred)(2) = 0.994) and the adequate precision (95.94). RESULTS: From the validated model demonstrated that the component had interaction with irradiation time under 180 min of the time while the interaction with pH was above pH 9. Moreover, photocatalyst and p-cresol had interaction at minimal amount of photocatalyst (< 0.8 g/L) and 100 mg/L p-cresol. CONCLUSION: These variables are interdependent and should be simultaneously considered during the photodegradation process, which is one of the advantages of the response surface methodology over the traditional laboratory method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3770455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37704552013-09-12 Interactions between photodegradation components Abdollahi, Yadollah Zakaria, Azmi Matori, Khamirul Amin Shameli, Kamyar Jahangirian, Hossein Rezayi, Majid Abdollahi, Tahereh Chem Cent J Research Article BACKGROUND: The interactions of p-cresol photocatalytic degradation components were studied by response surface methodology. The study was designed by central composite design using the irradiation time, pH, the amount of photocatalyst and the p-cresol concentration as variables. The design was performed to obtain photodegradation % as actual responses. The actual responses were fitted with linear, two factor interactions, cubic and quadratic model to select an appropriate model. The selected model was validated by analysis of variance which provided evidences such as high F-value (845.09), very low P-value (<.0.0001), non-significant lack of fit, the coefficient of R-squared (R(2) = 0.999), adjusted R-squared (R(adj)(2) = 0.998), predicted R-squared (R(pred)(2) = 0.994) and the adequate precision (95.94). RESULTS: From the validated model demonstrated that the component had interaction with irradiation time under 180 min of the time while the interaction with pH was above pH 9. Moreover, photocatalyst and p-cresol had interaction at minimal amount of photocatalyst (< 0.8 g/L) and 100 mg/L p-cresol. CONCLUSION: These variables are interdependent and should be simultaneously considered during the photodegradation process, which is one of the advantages of the response surface methodology over the traditional laboratory method. BioMed Central 2012-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3770455/ /pubmed/22967885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-100 Text en Copyright © 2012 Abdollahi et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abdollahi, Yadollah Zakaria, Azmi Matori, Khamirul Amin Shameli, Kamyar Jahangirian, Hossein Rezayi, Majid Abdollahi, Tahereh Interactions between photodegradation components |
title | Interactions between photodegradation components |
title_full | Interactions between photodegradation components |
title_fullStr | Interactions between photodegradation components |
title_full_unstemmed | Interactions between photodegradation components |
title_short | Interactions between photodegradation components |
title_sort | interactions between photodegradation components |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3770455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22967885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdollahiyadollah interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents AT zakariaazmi interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents AT matorikhamirulamin interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents AT shamelikamyar interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents AT jahangirianhossein interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents AT rezayimajid interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents AT abdollahitahereh interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents |