Cargando…

Interactions between photodegradation components

BACKGROUND: The interactions of p-cresol photocatalytic degradation components were studied by response surface methodology. The study was designed by central composite design using the irradiation time, pH, the amount of photocatalyst and the p-cresol concentration as variables. The design was perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdollahi, Yadollah, Zakaria, Azmi, Matori, Khamirul Amin, Shameli, Kamyar, Jahangirian, Hossein, Rezayi, Majid, Abdollahi, Tahereh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3770455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22967885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-100
_version_ 1782284092971155456
author Abdollahi, Yadollah
Zakaria, Azmi
Matori, Khamirul Amin
Shameli, Kamyar
Jahangirian, Hossein
Rezayi, Majid
Abdollahi, Tahereh
author_facet Abdollahi, Yadollah
Zakaria, Azmi
Matori, Khamirul Amin
Shameli, Kamyar
Jahangirian, Hossein
Rezayi, Majid
Abdollahi, Tahereh
author_sort Abdollahi, Yadollah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The interactions of p-cresol photocatalytic degradation components were studied by response surface methodology. The study was designed by central composite design using the irradiation time, pH, the amount of photocatalyst and the p-cresol concentration as variables. The design was performed to obtain photodegradation % as actual responses. The actual responses were fitted with linear, two factor interactions, cubic and quadratic model to select an appropriate model. The selected model was validated by analysis of variance which provided evidences such as high F-value (845.09), very low P-value (<.0.0001), non-significant lack of fit, the coefficient of R-squared (R(2) = 0.999), adjusted R-squared (R(adj)(2) = 0.998), predicted R-squared (R(pred)(2) = 0.994) and the adequate precision (95.94). RESULTS: From the validated model demonstrated that the component had interaction with irradiation time under 180 min of the time while the interaction with pH was above pH 9. Moreover, photocatalyst and p-cresol had interaction at minimal amount of photocatalyst (< 0.8 g/L) and 100 mg/L p-cresol. CONCLUSION: These variables are interdependent and should be simultaneously considered during the photodegradation process, which is one of the advantages of the response surface methodology over the traditional laboratory method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3770455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37704552013-09-12 Interactions between photodegradation components Abdollahi, Yadollah Zakaria, Azmi Matori, Khamirul Amin Shameli, Kamyar Jahangirian, Hossein Rezayi, Majid Abdollahi, Tahereh Chem Cent J Research Article BACKGROUND: The interactions of p-cresol photocatalytic degradation components were studied by response surface methodology. The study was designed by central composite design using the irradiation time, pH, the amount of photocatalyst and the p-cresol concentration as variables. The design was performed to obtain photodegradation % as actual responses. The actual responses were fitted with linear, two factor interactions, cubic and quadratic model to select an appropriate model. The selected model was validated by analysis of variance which provided evidences such as high F-value (845.09), very low P-value (<.0.0001), non-significant lack of fit, the coefficient of R-squared (R(2) = 0.999), adjusted R-squared (R(adj)(2) = 0.998), predicted R-squared (R(pred)(2) = 0.994) and the adequate precision (95.94). RESULTS: From the validated model demonstrated that the component had interaction with irradiation time under 180 min of the time while the interaction with pH was above pH 9. Moreover, photocatalyst and p-cresol had interaction at minimal amount of photocatalyst (< 0.8 g/L) and 100 mg/L p-cresol. CONCLUSION: These variables are interdependent and should be simultaneously considered during the photodegradation process, which is one of the advantages of the response surface methodology over the traditional laboratory method. BioMed Central 2012-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3770455/ /pubmed/22967885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-100 Text en Copyright © 2012 Abdollahi et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abdollahi, Yadollah
Zakaria, Azmi
Matori, Khamirul Amin
Shameli, Kamyar
Jahangirian, Hossein
Rezayi, Majid
Abdollahi, Tahereh
Interactions between photodegradation components
title Interactions between photodegradation components
title_full Interactions between photodegradation components
title_fullStr Interactions between photodegradation components
title_full_unstemmed Interactions between photodegradation components
title_short Interactions between photodegradation components
title_sort interactions between photodegradation components
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3770455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22967885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-100
work_keys_str_mv AT abdollahiyadollah interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents
AT zakariaazmi interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents
AT matorikhamirulamin interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents
AT shamelikamyar interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents
AT jahangirianhossein interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents
AT rezayimajid interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents
AT abdollahitahereh interactionsbetweenphotodegradationcomponents