Cargando…

Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas

Aims. To compare HB&L and BACTEC systems for detecting the microorganisms contaminating the corneal storage liquid preserved at 31°C. Methods. Human donor corneas were stored at 4°C followed by preservation at 31°C. Samples of the storage medium were inoculated in BACTEC Peds Plus/F (aerobic mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camposampiero, D., Grandesso, S., Zanetti, E., Mazzucato, S., Solinas, M., Parekh, M., Frigo, A. C., Gion, M., Ponzin, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3771424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/670947
_version_ 1782284195752574976
author Camposampiero, D.
Grandesso, S.
Zanetti, E.
Mazzucato, S.
Solinas, M.
Parekh, M.
Frigo, A. C.
Gion, M.
Ponzin, D.
author_facet Camposampiero, D.
Grandesso, S.
Zanetti, E.
Mazzucato, S.
Solinas, M.
Parekh, M.
Frigo, A. C.
Gion, M.
Ponzin, D.
author_sort Camposampiero, D.
collection PubMed
description Aims. To compare HB&L and BACTEC systems for detecting the microorganisms contaminating the corneal storage liquid preserved at 31°C. Methods. Human donor corneas were stored at 4°C followed by preservation at 31°C. Samples of the storage medium were inoculated in BACTEC Peds Plus/F (aerobic microorganisms), BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F (anaerobic microorganisms), and HB&L bottles. The tests were performed (a) after six days of storage, (b) end of storage, and (c) after 24 hours of preservation in deturgescent liquid sequentially. 10,655 storage and deturgescent media samples were subjected to microbiological control using BACTEC (6-day incubation) and HB&L (24-hour incubation) systems simultaneously. BACTEC positive/negative refers to both/either aerobic and anaerobic positives/negatives, whereas HB&L can only detect the aerobic microbes, and therefore the positives/negatives depend on the presence/absence of aerobic microorganisms. Results. 147 (1.38%) samples were identified positive with at least one of the two methods. 127 samples (134 identified microorganisms) were positive with both HB&L and BACTEC. 14 HB&L+/BACTEC− and 6 BACTEC+/HB&L− were identified. Sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (99.8%), and positive (90.1%) and negative predictive values (99.9%) were high with HB&L considering a 3.5% annual contamination rate. Conclusion. HB&L is a rapid system for detecting microorganisms in corneal storage medium in addition to the existing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3771424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37714242013-09-25 Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas Camposampiero, D. Grandesso, S. Zanetti, E. Mazzucato, S. Solinas, M. Parekh, M. Frigo, A. C. Gion, M. Ponzin, D. J Ophthalmol Research Article Aims. To compare HB&L and BACTEC systems for detecting the microorganisms contaminating the corneal storage liquid preserved at 31°C. Methods. Human donor corneas were stored at 4°C followed by preservation at 31°C. Samples of the storage medium were inoculated in BACTEC Peds Plus/F (aerobic microorganisms), BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F (anaerobic microorganisms), and HB&L bottles. The tests were performed (a) after six days of storage, (b) end of storage, and (c) after 24 hours of preservation in deturgescent liquid sequentially. 10,655 storage and deturgescent media samples were subjected to microbiological control using BACTEC (6-day incubation) and HB&L (24-hour incubation) systems simultaneously. BACTEC positive/negative refers to both/either aerobic and anaerobic positives/negatives, whereas HB&L can only detect the aerobic microbes, and therefore the positives/negatives depend on the presence/absence of aerobic microorganisms. Results. 147 (1.38%) samples were identified positive with at least one of the two methods. 127 samples (134 identified microorganisms) were positive with both HB&L and BACTEC. 14 HB&L+/BACTEC− and 6 BACTEC+/HB&L− were identified. Sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (99.8%), and positive (90.1%) and negative predictive values (99.9%) were high with HB&L considering a 3.5% annual contamination rate. Conclusion. HB&L is a rapid system for detecting microorganisms in corneal storage medium in addition to the existing methods. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3771424/ /pubmed/24069532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/670947 Text en Copyright © 2013 D. Camposampiero et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Camposampiero, D.
Grandesso, S.
Zanetti, E.
Mazzucato, S.
Solinas, M.
Parekh, M.
Frigo, A. C.
Gion, M.
Ponzin, D.
Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas
title Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas
title_full Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas
title_fullStr Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas
title_short Evaluation of the HB&L System for the Microbiological Screening of Storage Medium for Organ-Cultured Corneas
title_sort evaluation of the hb&l system for the microbiological screening of storage medium for organ-cultured corneas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3771424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/670947
work_keys_str_mv AT camposampierod evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT grandessos evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT zanettie evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT mazzucatos evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT solinasm evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT parekhm evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT frigoac evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT gionm evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas
AT ponzind evaluationofthehblsystemforthemicrobiologicalscreeningofstoragemediumfororganculturedcorneas