Cargando…
A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming
BACKGROUND: Cell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3771925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072670 |
_version_ | 1782284246754263040 |
---|---|
author | Colaneri, Alejandro Wang, Tianyuan Pagadala, Vijayakanth Kittur, Jaya Staffa, Nickolas G. Peddada, Shyamal D. Isganaitis, Elvira Patti, Mary Elizabeth Birnbaumer, Lutz |
author_facet | Colaneri, Alejandro Wang, Tianyuan Pagadala, Vijayakanth Kittur, Jaya Staffa, Nickolas G. Peddada, Shyamal D. Isganaitis, Elvira Patti, Mary Elizabeth Birnbaumer, Lutz |
author_sort | Colaneri, Alejandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DMS) must be un-methylated CpGs. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Comparison of expanded Methyl Sensitive Cut Counting data (eMSCC) among four tissues (liver, testes, brain and kidney) from three C57BL/6J mice, identified 138,052 differentially methylated sites of which 23,270 contain CpGs un-methylated in only one tissue (TS-DMS). Most of these CpGs were located in intergenic regions, outside of promoters, CpG islands or their shores, and up to 20% of them overlapped reported active enhancers. Indeed, tissue-specific enhancers were up to 30 fold enriched in TS-DMS. Testis showed the highest number of TS-DMS, but paradoxically their associated genes do not appear to be specific to the germ cell functions, but rather are involved in organism development. In the other tissues the differentially methylated genes are associated with tissue-specific physiological or anatomical functions. The identified sets of TS-DMS quantify epigenetic distances between tissues, generated during development. We applied this concept to measure the extent of reprogramming in the liver of mice exposed to in utero or early postnatal nutritional stress. Different protocols of food restriction reprogrammed the liver methylome in different but reproducible ways. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, each identified set of differentially methylated sites constituted an epigenetic signature that traced the developmental programing or the early nutritional reprogramming of each exposed mouse. We propose that our approach has the potential to outline a number of disease-associated epigenetic states. The composition of differentially methylated CpGs may vary with each situation, behaving as a composite variable, which can be used as a pre-symptomatic marker for disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3771925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37719252013-09-25 A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming Colaneri, Alejandro Wang, Tianyuan Pagadala, Vijayakanth Kittur, Jaya Staffa, Nickolas G. Peddada, Shyamal D. Isganaitis, Elvira Patti, Mary Elizabeth Birnbaumer, Lutz PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DMS) must be un-methylated CpGs. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Comparison of expanded Methyl Sensitive Cut Counting data (eMSCC) among four tissues (liver, testes, brain and kidney) from three C57BL/6J mice, identified 138,052 differentially methylated sites of which 23,270 contain CpGs un-methylated in only one tissue (TS-DMS). Most of these CpGs were located in intergenic regions, outside of promoters, CpG islands or their shores, and up to 20% of them overlapped reported active enhancers. Indeed, tissue-specific enhancers were up to 30 fold enriched in TS-DMS. Testis showed the highest number of TS-DMS, but paradoxically their associated genes do not appear to be specific to the germ cell functions, but rather are involved in organism development. In the other tissues the differentially methylated genes are associated with tissue-specific physiological or anatomical functions. The identified sets of TS-DMS quantify epigenetic distances between tissues, generated during development. We applied this concept to measure the extent of reprogramming in the liver of mice exposed to in utero or early postnatal nutritional stress. Different protocols of food restriction reprogrammed the liver methylome in different but reproducible ways. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, each identified set of differentially methylated sites constituted an epigenetic signature that traced the developmental programing or the early nutritional reprogramming of each exposed mouse. We propose that our approach has the potential to outline a number of disease-associated epigenetic states. The composition of differentially methylated CpGs may vary with each situation, behaving as a composite variable, which can be used as a pre-symptomatic marker for disease. Public Library of Science 2013-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3771925/ /pubmed/24069155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072670 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Colaneri, Alejandro Wang, Tianyuan Pagadala, Vijayakanth Kittur, Jaya Staffa, Nickolas G. Peddada, Shyamal D. Isganaitis, Elvira Patti, Mary Elizabeth Birnbaumer, Lutz A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming |
title | A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming |
title_full | A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming |
title_fullStr | A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming |
title_full_unstemmed | A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming |
title_short | A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming |
title_sort | minimal set of tissue-specific hypomethylated cpgs constitute epigenetic signatures of developmental programming |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3771925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colanerialejandro aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT wangtianyuan aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT pagadalavijayakanth aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT kitturjaya aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT staffanickolasg aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT peddadashyamald aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT isganaitiselvira aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT pattimaryelizabeth aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT birnbaumerlutz aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT colanerialejandro minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT wangtianyuan minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT pagadalavijayakanth minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT kitturjaya minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT staffanickolasg minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT peddadashyamald minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT isganaitiselvira minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT pattimaryelizabeth minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming AT birnbaumerlutz minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming |