Cargando…

A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming

BACKGROUND: Cell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colaneri, Alejandro, Wang, Tianyuan, Pagadala, Vijayakanth, Kittur, Jaya, Staffa, Nickolas G., Peddada, Shyamal D., Isganaitis, Elvira, Patti, Mary Elizabeth, Birnbaumer, Lutz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3771925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072670
_version_ 1782284246754263040
author Colaneri, Alejandro
Wang, Tianyuan
Pagadala, Vijayakanth
Kittur, Jaya
Staffa, Nickolas G.
Peddada, Shyamal D.
Isganaitis, Elvira
Patti, Mary Elizabeth
Birnbaumer, Lutz
author_facet Colaneri, Alejandro
Wang, Tianyuan
Pagadala, Vijayakanth
Kittur, Jaya
Staffa, Nickolas G.
Peddada, Shyamal D.
Isganaitis, Elvira
Patti, Mary Elizabeth
Birnbaumer, Lutz
author_sort Colaneri, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DMS) must be un-methylated CpGs. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Comparison of expanded Methyl Sensitive Cut Counting data (eMSCC) among four tissues (liver, testes, brain and kidney) from three C57BL/6J mice, identified 138,052 differentially methylated sites of which 23,270 contain CpGs un-methylated in only one tissue (TS-DMS). Most of these CpGs were located in intergenic regions, outside of promoters, CpG islands or their shores, and up to 20% of them overlapped reported active enhancers. Indeed, tissue-specific enhancers were up to 30 fold enriched in TS-DMS. Testis showed the highest number of TS-DMS, but paradoxically their associated genes do not appear to be specific to the germ cell functions, but rather are involved in organism development. In the other tissues the differentially methylated genes are associated with tissue-specific physiological or anatomical functions. The identified sets of TS-DMS quantify epigenetic distances between tissues, generated during development. We applied this concept to measure the extent of reprogramming in the liver of mice exposed to in utero or early postnatal nutritional stress. Different protocols of food restriction reprogrammed the liver methylome in different but reproducible ways. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, each identified set of differentially methylated sites constituted an epigenetic signature that traced the developmental programing or the early nutritional reprogramming of each exposed mouse. We propose that our approach has the potential to outline a number of disease-associated epigenetic states. The composition of differentially methylated CpGs may vary with each situation, behaving as a composite variable, which can be used as a pre-symptomatic marker for disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3771925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37719252013-09-25 A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming Colaneri, Alejandro Wang, Tianyuan Pagadala, Vijayakanth Kittur, Jaya Staffa, Nickolas G. Peddada, Shyamal D. Isganaitis, Elvira Patti, Mary Elizabeth Birnbaumer, Lutz PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cell specific states of the chromatin are programmed during mammalian development. Dynamic DNA methylation across the developing embryo guides a program of repression, switching off genes in most cell types. Thus, the majority of the tissue specific differentially methylated sites (TS-DMS) must be un-methylated CpGs. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Comparison of expanded Methyl Sensitive Cut Counting data (eMSCC) among four tissues (liver, testes, brain and kidney) from three C57BL/6J mice, identified 138,052 differentially methylated sites of which 23,270 contain CpGs un-methylated in only one tissue (TS-DMS). Most of these CpGs were located in intergenic regions, outside of promoters, CpG islands or their shores, and up to 20% of them overlapped reported active enhancers. Indeed, tissue-specific enhancers were up to 30 fold enriched in TS-DMS. Testis showed the highest number of TS-DMS, but paradoxically their associated genes do not appear to be specific to the germ cell functions, but rather are involved in organism development. In the other tissues the differentially methylated genes are associated with tissue-specific physiological or anatomical functions. The identified sets of TS-DMS quantify epigenetic distances between tissues, generated during development. We applied this concept to measure the extent of reprogramming in the liver of mice exposed to in utero or early postnatal nutritional stress. Different protocols of food restriction reprogrammed the liver methylome in different but reproducible ways. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, each identified set of differentially methylated sites constituted an epigenetic signature that traced the developmental programing or the early nutritional reprogramming of each exposed mouse. We propose that our approach has the potential to outline a number of disease-associated epigenetic states. The composition of differentially methylated CpGs may vary with each situation, behaving as a composite variable, which can be used as a pre-symptomatic marker for disease. Public Library of Science 2013-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3771925/ /pubmed/24069155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072670 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Colaneri, Alejandro
Wang, Tianyuan
Pagadala, Vijayakanth
Kittur, Jaya
Staffa, Nickolas G.
Peddada, Shyamal D.
Isganaitis, Elvira
Patti, Mary Elizabeth
Birnbaumer, Lutz
A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming
title A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming
title_full A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming
title_fullStr A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming
title_full_unstemmed A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming
title_short A Minimal Set of Tissue-Specific Hypomethylated CpGs Constitute Epigenetic Signatures of Developmental Programming
title_sort minimal set of tissue-specific hypomethylated cpgs constitute epigenetic signatures of developmental programming
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3771925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072670
work_keys_str_mv AT colanerialejandro aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT wangtianyuan aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT pagadalavijayakanth aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT kitturjaya aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT staffanickolasg aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT peddadashyamald aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT isganaitiselvira aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT pattimaryelizabeth aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT birnbaumerlutz aminimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT colanerialejandro minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT wangtianyuan minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT pagadalavijayakanth minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT kitturjaya minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT staffanickolasg minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT peddadashyamald minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT isganaitiselvira minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT pattimaryelizabeth minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming
AT birnbaumerlutz minimalsetoftissuespecifichypomethylatedcpgsconstituteepigeneticsignaturesofdevelopmentalprogramming