Cargando…

Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pretreatment evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is effective for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with poor conspicuity on conventional ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ah Yeong, Lee, Min Woo, Rhim, Hyunchul, Cha, Dong Ik, Choi, Dongil, Kim, Young-sun, Lim, Hyo Keun, Cho, Seong Whi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3772254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24043968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.754
_version_ 1782284298918821888
author Kim, Ah Yeong
Lee, Min Woo
Rhim, Hyunchul
Cha, Dong Ik
Choi, Dongil
Kim, Young-sun
Lim, Hyo Keun
Cho, Seong Whi
author_facet Kim, Ah Yeong
Lee, Min Woo
Rhim, Hyunchul
Cha, Dong Ik
Choi, Dongil
Kim, Young-sun
Lim, Hyo Keun
Cho, Seong Whi
author_sort Kim, Ah Yeong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pretreatment evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is effective for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with poor conspicuity on conventional ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was waived. From June 2008 to July 2011, 82 patients having HCCs (1.2 ± 0.4 cm) with poor conspicuity on planning US for RFA were evaluated with CEUS prior to percutaneous RFA. We analyzed our database, radiologic reports, and US images in order to determine whether the location of HCC candidates on planning US coincide with that on CEUS. To avoid incomplete ablation, percutaneous RFA was performed only when HCC nodules were identified on CEUS. The rate of technical success was assessed. The cumulative rate of local tumor progression was estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method (mean follow-up: 24.0 ± 13.0 months). RESULTS: Among 82 patients, 73 (89%) HCCs were identified on CEUS, whereas 9 (11%) were not. Of 73 identifiable HCCs on CEUS, the location of HCC on planning US corresponded with that on CEUS in 64 (87.7%), whereas the location did not correspond in 9 (12.3%) HCCs. Technical success was achieved for all 73 identifiable HCCs on CEUS in a single (n = 72) or two (n = 1) RFA sessions. Cumulative rates of local tumor progression were estimated as 1.9% and 15.4% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment evaluation with CEUS is effective for percutaneous RFA of HCCs with poor conspicuity on conventional US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3772254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37722542013-09-16 Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography Kim, Ah Yeong Lee, Min Woo Rhim, Hyunchul Cha, Dong Ik Choi, Dongil Kim, Young-sun Lim, Hyo Keun Cho, Seong Whi Korean J Radiol Gastrointestinal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pretreatment evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is effective for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with poor conspicuity on conventional ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was waived. From June 2008 to July 2011, 82 patients having HCCs (1.2 ± 0.4 cm) with poor conspicuity on planning US for RFA were evaluated with CEUS prior to percutaneous RFA. We analyzed our database, radiologic reports, and US images in order to determine whether the location of HCC candidates on planning US coincide with that on CEUS. To avoid incomplete ablation, percutaneous RFA was performed only when HCC nodules were identified on CEUS. The rate of technical success was assessed. The cumulative rate of local tumor progression was estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method (mean follow-up: 24.0 ± 13.0 months). RESULTS: Among 82 patients, 73 (89%) HCCs were identified on CEUS, whereas 9 (11%) were not. Of 73 identifiable HCCs on CEUS, the location of HCC on planning US corresponded with that on CEUS in 64 (87.7%), whereas the location did not correspond in 9 (12.3%) HCCs. Technical success was achieved for all 73 identifiable HCCs on CEUS in a single (n = 72) or two (n = 1) RFA sessions. Cumulative rates of local tumor progression were estimated as 1.9% and 15.4% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment evaluation with CEUS is effective for percutaneous RFA of HCCs with poor conspicuity on conventional US. The Korean Society of Radiology 2013 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3772254/ /pubmed/24043968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.754 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Imaging
Kim, Ah Yeong
Lee, Min Woo
Rhim, Hyunchul
Cha, Dong Ik
Choi, Dongil
Kim, Young-sun
Lim, Hyo Keun
Cho, Seong Whi
Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography
title Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography
title_full Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography
title_fullStr Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography
title_full_unstemmed Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography
title_short Pretreatment Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas with Poor Conspicuity on Conventional Ultrasonography
title_sort pretreatment evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas with poor conspicuity on conventional ultrasonography
topic Gastrointestinal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3772254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24043968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.754
work_keys_str_mv AT kimahyeong pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography
AT leeminwoo pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography
AT rhimhyunchul pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography
AT chadongik pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography
AT choidongil pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography
AT kimyoungsun pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography
AT limhyokeun pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography
AT choseongwhi pretreatmentevaluationwithcontrastenhancedultrasonographyforpercutaneousradiofrequencyablationofhepatocellularcarcinomaswithpoorconspicuityonconventionalultrasonography