Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Aclidinium bromide is a new long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) indicated for maintenance bronchodilator treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of aclidinium was compared with tiotropium and glycopyrronium, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of rand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karabis, Andreas, Lindner, Leandro, Mocarski, Michelle, Huisman, Eline, Greening, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3772873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24043936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S48967
_version_ 1782284377335529472
author Karabis, Andreas
Lindner, Leandro
Mocarski, Michelle
Huisman, Eline
Greening, Andrew
author_facet Karabis, Andreas
Lindner, Leandro
Mocarski, Michelle
Huisman, Eline
Greening, Andrew
author_sort Karabis, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aclidinium bromide is a new long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) indicated for maintenance bronchodilator treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of aclidinium was compared with tiotropium and glycopyrronium, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in moderate-to-severe COPD patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs evaluating aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (BID), glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily (OD), tiotropium 18 μg OD, or tiotropium 5 μg OD in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD. The outcomes of interest were: trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)); St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and proportion of patients achieving ≥4 unit change; Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and proportion of patients achieving ≥1 point change. The results were synthesized by means of a Bayesian NMA. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (22,542 patients) were included: aclidinium 400 μg BID (three studies); tiotropium 5 μg OD (three studies); tiotropium 18 μg OD (13 studies); and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD (two studies). Regarding trough FEV(1) at 24 weeks, aclidinium demonstrated comparable efficacy to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in change from baseline [CFB]), (0.02 L [95% credible interval CrI −0.05, 0.09]); tiotropium 18 μg (0.02 L [95% CrI −0.05, 0.08]); and glycopyrronium (0.00 L [95% CrI −0.07, 0.07]). Aclidinium resulted in higher improvement in SGRQ score at 24 weeks, compared to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in CFB, −2.44 [95% CrI −4.82, −0.05]); and comparable results to tiotropium 18 μg (−1.80 [95% CrI −4.52, 0.14]) and glycopyrronium (−1.52 [95% CrI −4.08, 1.03]). Improvements in TDI score were comparable for all treatments. CONCLUSION: Maintenance treatment with aclidinium 400 μg BID is expected to produce similar improvements in lung function, health-related quality of life, and dyspnea compared to tiotropium 5 μg OD; tiotropium 18 μg OD; and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3772873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37728732013-09-16 Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Karabis, Andreas Lindner, Leandro Mocarski, Michelle Huisman, Eline Greening, Andrew Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Aclidinium bromide is a new long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) indicated for maintenance bronchodilator treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of aclidinium was compared with tiotropium and glycopyrronium, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in moderate-to-severe COPD patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs evaluating aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (BID), glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily (OD), tiotropium 18 μg OD, or tiotropium 5 μg OD in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD. The outcomes of interest were: trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)); St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and proportion of patients achieving ≥4 unit change; Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and proportion of patients achieving ≥1 point change. The results were synthesized by means of a Bayesian NMA. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (22,542 patients) were included: aclidinium 400 μg BID (three studies); tiotropium 5 μg OD (three studies); tiotropium 18 μg OD (13 studies); and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD (two studies). Regarding trough FEV(1) at 24 weeks, aclidinium demonstrated comparable efficacy to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in change from baseline [CFB]), (0.02 L [95% credible interval CrI −0.05, 0.09]); tiotropium 18 μg (0.02 L [95% CrI −0.05, 0.08]); and glycopyrronium (0.00 L [95% CrI −0.07, 0.07]). Aclidinium resulted in higher improvement in SGRQ score at 24 weeks, compared to tiotropium 5 μg (difference in CFB, −2.44 [95% CrI −4.82, −0.05]); and comparable results to tiotropium 18 μg (−1.80 [95% CrI −4.52, 0.14]) and glycopyrronium (−1.52 [95% CrI −4.08, 1.03]). Improvements in TDI score were comparable for all treatments. CONCLUSION: Maintenance treatment with aclidinium 400 μg BID is expected to produce similar improvements in lung function, health-related quality of life, and dyspnea compared to tiotropium 5 μg OD; tiotropium 18 μg OD; and glycopyrronium 50 μg OD. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3772873/ /pubmed/24043936 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S48967 Text en © 2013 Karabis et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Karabis, Andreas
Lindner, Leandro
Mocarski, Michelle
Huisman, Eline
Greening, Andrew
Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe copd patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3772873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24043936
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S48967
work_keys_str_mv AT karabisandreas comparativeefficacyofaclidiniumversusglycopyrroniumandtiotropiumasmaintenancetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecopdpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lindnerleandro comparativeefficacyofaclidiniumversusglycopyrroniumandtiotropiumasmaintenancetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecopdpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mocarskimichelle comparativeefficacyofaclidiniumversusglycopyrroniumandtiotropiumasmaintenancetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecopdpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT huismaneline comparativeefficacyofaclidiniumversusglycopyrroniumandtiotropiumasmaintenancetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecopdpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT greeningandrew comparativeefficacyofaclidiniumversusglycopyrroniumandtiotropiumasmaintenancetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecopdpatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis