Cargando…

Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study

OBJECTIVES: Outcomes of liver transplantations from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors may be inferior to those achieved with donation after brain death (DBD) donors. The impact of using DCD donors is likely to depend on specific national practices. We compared risk-adjusted graft loss an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callaghan, Christopher J, Charman, Susan C, Muiesan, Paolo, Powell, James J, Gimson, Alexander E, van der Meulen, Jan H P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3773642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24002984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003287
_version_ 1782284436230897664
author Callaghan, Christopher J
Charman, Susan C
Muiesan, Paolo
Powell, James J
Gimson, Alexander E
van der Meulen, Jan H P
author_facet Callaghan, Christopher J
Charman, Susan C
Muiesan, Paolo
Powell, James J
Gimson, Alexander E
van der Meulen, Jan H P
author_sort Callaghan, Christopher J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Outcomes of liver transplantations from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors may be inferior to those achieved with donation after brain death (DBD) donors. The impact of using DCD donors is likely to depend on specific national practices. We compared risk-adjusted graft loss and recipient mortality after transplantation of DCD and DBD livers in the UK. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching were used to estimate risk-adjusted HR. SETTING: 7 liver transplant centres in the National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who received a first elective liver transplant between January 2005 and December 2010 who were identified in the UK Liver Transplant Audit. INTERVENTIONS: Transplantation of DCD and DBD livers. OUTCOMES: Graft loss and recipient mortality. RESULTS: In total, 2572 liver transplants were identified with 352 (14%) from DCD donors. 3-year graft loss (95% CI) was higher with DCD livers (27.3%, 21.8% to 33.9%) than with DBD livers (18.2%, 16.4% to 20.2%). After adjustment with regression, HR for graft loss was 2.3 (1.7 to 3.0). Similarly, 3-year mortality was higher with DCD livers (19.4%, 14.5% to 25.6%) than with DBD livers (14.1%, 12.5% to 16.0%) with an adjusted HR of 2.0 (1.4 to 2.8). Propensity score matching gave similar results. Centre-specific adjusted HRs for graft loss and recipient mortality seemed to differ among transplant centres, although statistical evidence is weak (p value for interaction 0.08 and 0.24, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Graft loss and recipient mortality were about twice as high with DCD livers as with DBD livers in the UK. Outcomes after DCD liver transplantation may vary between centres. These results should inform policies for the use of DCD livers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3773642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37736422013-09-16 Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study Callaghan, Christopher J Charman, Susan C Muiesan, Paolo Powell, James J Gimson, Alexander E van der Meulen, Jan H P BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVES: Outcomes of liver transplantations from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors may be inferior to those achieved with donation after brain death (DBD) donors. The impact of using DCD donors is likely to depend on specific national practices. We compared risk-adjusted graft loss and recipient mortality after transplantation of DCD and DBD livers in the UK. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching were used to estimate risk-adjusted HR. SETTING: 7 liver transplant centres in the National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Adults who received a first elective liver transplant between January 2005 and December 2010 who were identified in the UK Liver Transplant Audit. INTERVENTIONS: Transplantation of DCD and DBD livers. OUTCOMES: Graft loss and recipient mortality. RESULTS: In total, 2572 liver transplants were identified with 352 (14%) from DCD donors. 3-year graft loss (95% CI) was higher with DCD livers (27.3%, 21.8% to 33.9%) than with DBD livers (18.2%, 16.4% to 20.2%). After adjustment with regression, HR for graft loss was 2.3 (1.7 to 3.0). Similarly, 3-year mortality was higher with DCD livers (19.4%, 14.5% to 25.6%) than with DBD livers (14.1%, 12.5% to 16.0%) with an adjusted HR of 2.0 (1.4 to 2.8). Propensity score matching gave similar results. Centre-specific adjusted HRs for graft loss and recipient mortality seemed to differ among transplant centres, although statistical evidence is weak (p value for interaction 0.08 and 0.24, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Graft loss and recipient mortality were about twice as high with DCD livers as with DBD livers in the UK. Outcomes after DCD liver transplantation may vary between centres. These results should inform policies for the use of DCD livers. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3773642/ /pubmed/24002984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003287 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Callaghan, Christopher J
Charman, Susan C
Muiesan, Paolo
Powell, James J
Gimson, Alexander E
van der Meulen, Jan H P
Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
title Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
title_full Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
title_fullStr Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
title_short Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
title_sort outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the uk: a cohort study
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3773642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24002984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003287
work_keys_str_mv AT callaghanchristopherj outcomesoftransplantationofliversfromdonationaftercirculatorydeathdonorsintheukacohortstudy
AT charmansusanc outcomesoftransplantationofliversfromdonationaftercirculatorydeathdonorsintheukacohortstudy
AT muiesanpaolo outcomesoftransplantationofliversfromdonationaftercirculatorydeathdonorsintheukacohortstudy
AT powelljamesj outcomesoftransplantationofliversfromdonationaftercirculatorydeathdonorsintheukacohortstudy
AT gimsonalexandere outcomesoftransplantationofliversfromdonationaftercirculatorydeathdonorsintheukacohortstudy
AT vandermeulenjanhp outcomesoftransplantationofliversfromdonationaftercirculatorydeathdonorsintheukacohortstudy
AT outcomesoftransplantationofliversfromdonationaftercirculatorydeathdonorsintheukacohortstudy