Cargando…

Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Low levels of physical activity are a major public health concern, and interventions to promote physical activity have had limited success. Whether or not personalised feedback about physical activity following objective measurement motivates behaviour change has yet to be rigorously exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godino, Job G., Watkinson, Clare, Corder, Kirsten, Marteau, Theresa M., Sutton, Stephen, Sharp, Stephen J., Griffin, Simon J., van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24066178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075398
_version_ 1782284485691179008
author Godino, Job G.
Watkinson, Clare
Corder, Kirsten
Marteau, Theresa M.
Sutton, Stephen
Sharp, Stephen J.
Griffin, Simon J.
van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
author_facet Godino, Job G.
Watkinson, Clare
Corder, Kirsten
Marteau, Theresa M.
Sutton, Stephen
Sharp, Stephen J.
Griffin, Simon J.
van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
author_sort Godino, Job G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low levels of physical activity are a major public health concern, and interventions to promote physical activity have had limited success. Whether or not personalised feedback about physical activity following objective measurement motivates behaviour change has yet to be rigorously examined. METHODS: And Findings: In a parallel group, open randomised controlled trial, 466 healthy adults aged 32 to 54 years were recruited from the ongoing population-based Fenland Study (Cambridgeshire, UK). Participants were randomised to receive either no feedback until the end of the trial (control group, n=120) or one of three different types of feedback: simple, visual, or contextualised (intervention groups, n=346). The primary outcome was physical activity (physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) in kJ/kg/day and average body acceleration (ACC) in m/s(2)) measured objectively using a combined heart rate monitor and accelerometer (Actiheart(®)). The main secondary outcomes included self-reported physical activity, intention to increase physical activity, and awareness of physical activity (the agreement between self-rated and objectively measured physical activity). At 8 weeks, 391 (83.9%) participants had complete physical activity data. The intervention had no effect on objectively measured physical activity (PAEE: β=-0.92, 95% CI=-3.50 to 1.66, p=0.48 and ACC: β=0.01, 95% CI=-0.00 to 0.02, p=0.21), self-reported physical activity (β=-0.39, 95% CI=-1.59 to 0.81), or intention to increase physical activity (β=-0.05, 95% CI=-0.22 to 0.11). However, it was associated with an increase in awareness of physical activity (OR=1.74, 95% CI=1.05 to 2.89). Results did not differ according to the type of feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Personalised feedback about physical activity following objective measurement increased awareness but did not result in changes in physical activity in the short term. Measurement and feedback may have a role in promoting behaviour change but are ineffective on their own. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN92551397 http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN92551397
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3774634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37746342013-09-24 Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial Godino, Job G. Watkinson, Clare Corder, Kirsten Marteau, Theresa M. Sutton, Stephen Sharp, Stephen J. Griffin, Simon J. van Sluijs, Esther M. F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Low levels of physical activity are a major public health concern, and interventions to promote physical activity have had limited success. Whether or not personalised feedback about physical activity following objective measurement motivates behaviour change has yet to be rigorously examined. METHODS: And Findings: In a parallel group, open randomised controlled trial, 466 healthy adults aged 32 to 54 years were recruited from the ongoing population-based Fenland Study (Cambridgeshire, UK). Participants were randomised to receive either no feedback until the end of the trial (control group, n=120) or one of three different types of feedback: simple, visual, or contextualised (intervention groups, n=346). The primary outcome was physical activity (physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) in kJ/kg/day and average body acceleration (ACC) in m/s(2)) measured objectively using a combined heart rate monitor and accelerometer (Actiheart(®)). The main secondary outcomes included self-reported physical activity, intention to increase physical activity, and awareness of physical activity (the agreement between self-rated and objectively measured physical activity). At 8 weeks, 391 (83.9%) participants had complete physical activity data. The intervention had no effect on objectively measured physical activity (PAEE: β=-0.92, 95% CI=-3.50 to 1.66, p=0.48 and ACC: β=0.01, 95% CI=-0.00 to 0.02, p=0.21), self-reported physical activity (β=-0.39, 95% CI=-1.59 to 0.81), or intention to increase physical activity (β=-0.05, 95% CI=-0.22 to 0.11). However, it was associated with an increase in awareness of physical activity (OR=1.74, 95% CI=1.05 to 2.89). Results did not differ according to the type of feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Personalised feedback about physical activity following objective measurement increased awareness but did not result in changes in physical activity in the short term. Measurement and feedback may have a role in promoting behaviour change but are ineffective on their own. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN92551397 http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN92551397 Public Library of Science 2013-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3774634/ /pubmed/24066178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075398 Text en © 2013 Godino et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Godino, Job G.
Watkinson, Clare
Corder, Kirsten
Marteau, Theresa M.
Sutton, Stephen
Sharp, Stephen J.
Griffin, Simon J.
van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial
title Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Impact of Personalised Feedback about Physical Activity on Change in Objectively Measured Physical Activity (the FAB Study): A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort impact of personalised feedback about physical activity on change in objectively measured physical activity (the fab study): a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24066178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075398
work_keys_str_mv AT godinojobg impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT watkinsonclare impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT corderkirsten impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marteautheresam impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT suttonstephen impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sharpstephenj impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT griffinsimonj impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vansluijsesthermf impactofpersonalisedfeedbackaboutphysicalactivityonchangeinobjectivelymeasuredphysicalactivitythefabstudyarandomisedcontrolledtrial