Cargando…
Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049561 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219 |
_version_ | 1782284543380684800 |
---|---|
author | Song, Tae-Jin Kwon, Taek-Ka Yang, Jae-Ho Han, Jung-Suk Lee, Jai-Bong Kim, Sung-Hun Yeo, In-Sung |
author_facet | Song, Tae-Jin Kwon, Taek-Ka Yang, Jae-Ho Han, Jung-Suk Lee, Jai-Bong Kim, Sung-Hun Yeo, In-Sung |
author_sort | Song, Tae-Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metal-ceramic FPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. RESULTS: Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 µm for the Everest group, 78.71 µm for the Lava group, and 81.32 µm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3774934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37749342013-09-18 Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems Song, Tae-Jin Kwon, Taek-Ka Yang, Jae-Ho Han, Jung-Suk Lee, Jai-Bong Kim, Sung-Hun Yeo, In-Sung J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metal-ceramic FPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. RESULTS: Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 µm for the Everest group, 78.71 µm for the Lava group, and 81.32 µm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2013-08 2013-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3774934/ /pubmed/24049561 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219 Text en © 2013 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Song, Tae-Jin Kwon, Taek-Ka Yang, Jae-Ho Han, Jung-Suk Lee, Jai-Bong Kim, Sung-Hun Yeo, In-Sung Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems |
title | Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems |
title_full | Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems |
title_fullStr | Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems |
title_short | Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems |
title_sort | marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different cad/cam systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049561 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songtaejin marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems AT kwontaekka marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems AT yangjaeho marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems AT hanjungsuk marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems AT leejaibong marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems AT kimsunghun marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems AT yeoinsung marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems |