Cargando…

Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems

PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Tae-Jin, Kwon, Taek-Ka, Yang, Jae-Ho, Han, Jung-Suk, Lee, Jai-Bong, Kim, Sung-Hun, Yeo, In-Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049561
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219
_version_ 1782284543380684800
author Song, Tae-Jin
Kwon, Taek-Ka
Yang, Jae-Ho
Han, Jung-Suk
Lee, Jai-Bong
Kim, Sung-Hun
Yeo, In-Sung
author_facet Song, Tae-Jin
Kwon, Taek-Ka
Yang, Jae-Ho
Han, Jung-Suk
Lee, Jai-Bong
Kim, Sung-Hun
Yeo, In-Sung
author_sort Song, Tae-Jin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metal-ceramic FPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. RESULTS: Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 µm for the Everest group, 78.71 µm for the Lava group, and 81.32 µm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3774934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37749342013-09-18 Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems Song, Tae-Jin Kwon, Taek-Ka Yang, Jae-Ho Han, Jung-Suk Lee, Jai-Bong Kim, Sung-Hun Yeo, In-Sung J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metal-ceramic FPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan test. RESULTS: Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 µm for the Everest group, 78.71 µm for the Lava group, and 81.32 µm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2013-08 2013-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3774934/ /pubmed/24049561 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219 Text en © 2013 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Tae-Jin
Kwon, Taek-Ka
Yang, Jae-Ho
Han, Jung-Suk
Lee, Jai-Bong
Kim, Sung-Hun
Yeo, In-Sung
Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
title Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
title_full Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
title_fullStr Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
title_full_unstemmed Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
title_short Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
title_sort marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different cad/cam systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049561
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219
work_keys_str_mv AT songtaejin marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems
AT kwontaekka marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems
AT yangjaeho marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems
AT hanjungsuk marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems
AT leejaibong marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems
AT kimsunghun marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems
AT yeoinsung marginalfitofanterior3unitfixedpartialzirconiarestorationsusingdifferentcadcamsystems