Cargando…

Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants

In high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, the source dwell times and dwell positions are vital parameters in achieving a desirable implant dose distribution. Inverse treatment planning requires an optimal choice of these parameters to achieve the desired target coverage with the lowest achievable dose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manikandan, Arjunan, Sarkar, Biplab, Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur, King, Paul R., Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana, Holla, Ragavendra, Kotur, Sachin, Nadendla, Sujatha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.116380
_version_ 1782284565416509440
author Manikandan, Arjunan
Sarkar, Biplab
Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur
King, Paul R.
Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana
Holla, Ragavendra
Kotur, Sachin
Nadendla, Sujatha
author_facet Manikandan, Arjunan
Sarkar, Biplab
Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur
King, Paul R.
Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana
Holla, Ragavendra
Kotur, Sachin
Nadendla, Sujatha
author_sort Manikandan, Arjunan
collection PubMed
description In high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, the source dwell times and dwell positions are vital parameters in achieving a desirable implant dose distribution. Inverse treatment planning requires an optimal choice of these parameters to achieve the desired target coverage with the lowest achievable dose to the organs at risk (OAR). This study was designed to evaluate the optimum source step size and maximum source dwell time for prostate brachytherapy implants using an Ir-192 source. In total, one hundred inverse treatment plans were generated for the four patients included in this study. Twenty-five treatment plans were created for each patient by varying the step size and maximum source dwell time during anatomy-based, inverse-planned optimization. Other relevant treatment planning parameters were kept constant, including the dose constraints and source dwell positions. Each plan was evaluated for target coverage, urethral and rectal dose sparing, treatment time, relative target dose homogeneity, and nonuniformity ratio. The plans with 0.5 cm step size were seen to have clinically acceptable tumor coverage, minimal normal structure doses, and minimum treatment time as compared with the other step sizes. The target coverage for this step size is 87% of the prescription dose, while the urethral and maximum rectal doses were 107.3 and 68.7%, respectively. No appreciable difference in plan quality was observed with variation in maximum source dwell time. The step size plays a significant role in plan optimization for prostate implants. Our study supports use of a 0.5 cm step size for prostate implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3775040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37750402013-09-18 Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants Manikandan, Arjunan Sarkar, Biplab Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur King, Paul R. Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana Holla, Ragavendra Kotur, Sachin Nadendla, Sujatha J Med Phys Technical Note In high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, the source dwell times and dwell positions are vital parameters in achieving a desirable implant dose distribution. Inverse treatment planning requires an optimal choice of these parameters to achieve the desired target coverage with the lowest achievable dose to the organs at risk (OAR). This study was designed to evaluate the optimum source step size and maximum source dwell time for prostate brachytherapy implants using an Ir-192 source. In total, one hundred inverse treatment plans were generated for the four patients included in this study. Twenty-five treatment plans were created for each patient by varying the step size and maximum source dwell time during anatomy-based, inverse-planned optimization. Other relevant treatment planning parameters were kept constant, including the dose constraints and source dwell positions. Each plan was evaluated for target coverage, urethral and rectal dose sparing, treatment time, relative target dose homogeneity, and nonuniformity ratio. The plans with 0.5 cm step size were seen to have clinically acceptable tumor coverage, minimal normal structure doses, and minimum treatment time as compared with the other step sizes. The target coverage for this step size is 87% of the prescription dose, while the urethral and maximum rectal doses were 107.3 and 68.7%, respectively. No appreciable difference in plan quality was observed with variation in maximum source dwell time. The step size plays a significant role in plan optimization for prostate implants. Our study supports use of a 0.5 cm step size for prostate implants. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3775040/ /pubmed/24049323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.116380 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Manikandan, Arjunan
Sarkar, Biplab
Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur
King, Paul R.
Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana
Holla, Ragavendra
Kotur, Sachin
Nadendla, Sujatha
Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
title Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
title_full Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
title_fullStr Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
title_full_unstemmed Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
title_short Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
title_sort role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049323
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.116380
work_keys_str_mv AT manikandanarjunan roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants
AT sarkarbiplab roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants
AT rajendranvivekthirupathur roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants
AT kingpaulr roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants
AT srestynvmadhusudhana roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants
AT hollaragavendra roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants
AT kotursachin roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants
AT nadendlasujatha roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants