Cargando…
Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants
In high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, the source dwell times and dwell positions are vital parameters in achieving a desirable implant dose distribution. Inverse treatment planning requires an optimal choice of these parameters to achieve the desired target coverage with the lowest achievable dose...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.116380 |
_version_ | 1782284565416509440 |
---|---|
author | Manikandan, Arjunan Sarkar, Biplab Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur King, Paul R. Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana Holla, Ragavendra Kotur, Sachin Nadendla, Sujatha |
author_facet | Manikandan, Arjunan Sarkar, Biplab Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur King, Paul R. Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana Holla, Ragavendra Kotur, Sachin Nadendla, Sujatha |
author_sort | Manikandan, Arjunan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, the source dwell times and dwell positions are vital parameters in achieving a desirable implant dose distribution. Inverse treatment planning requires an optimal choice of these parameters to achieve the desired target coverage with the lowest achievable dose to the organs at risk (OAR). This study was designed to evaluate the optimum source step size and maximum source dwell time for prostate brachytherapy implants using an Ir-192 source. In total, one hundred inverse treatment plans were generated for the four patients included in this study. Twenty-five treatment plans were created for each patient by varying the step size and maximum source dwell time during anatomy-based, inverse-planned optimization. Other relevant treatment planning parameters were kept constant, including the dose constraints and source dwell positions. Each plan was evaluated for target coverage, urethral and rectal dose sparing, treatment time, relative target dose homogeneity, and nonuniformity ratio. The plans with 0.5 cm step size were seen to have clinically acceptable tumor coverage, minimal normal structure doses, and minimum treatment time as compared with the other step sizes. The target coverage for this step size is 87% of the prescription dose, while the urethral and maximum rectal doses were 107.3 and 68.7%, respectively. No appreciable difference in plan quality was observed with variation in maximum source dwell time. The step size plays a significant role in plan optimization for prostate implants. Our study supports use of a 0.5 cm step size for prostate implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3775040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37750402013-09-18 Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants Manikandan, Arjunan Sarkar, Biplab Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur King, Paul R. Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana Holla, Ragavendra Kotur, Sachin Nadendla, Sujatha J Med Phys Technical Note In high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, the source dwell times and dwell positions are vital parameters in achieving a desirable implant dose distribution. Inverse treatment planning requires an optimal choice of these parameters to achieve the desired target coverage with the lowest achievable dose to the organs at risk (OAR). This study was designed to evaluate the optimum source step size and maximum source dwell time for prostate brachytherapy implants using an Ir-192 source. In total, one hundred inverse treatment plans were generated for the four patients included in this study. Twenty-five treatment plans were created for each patient by varying the step size and maximum source dwell time during anatomy-based, inverse-planned optimization. Other relevant treatment planning parameters were kept constant, including the dose constraints and source dwell positions. Each plan was evaluated for target coverage, urethral and rectal dose sparing, treatment time, relative target dose homogeneity, and nonuniformity ratio. The plans with 0.5 cm step size were seen to have clinically acceptable tumor coverage, minimal normal structure doses, and minimum treatment time as compared with the other step sizes. The target coverage for this step size is 87% of the prescription dose, while the urethral and maximum rectal doses were 107.3 and 68.7%, respectively. No appreciable difference in plan quality was observed with variation in maximum source dwell time. The step size plays a significant role in plan optimization for prostate implants. Our study supports use of a 0.5 cm step size for prostate implants. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3775040/ /pubmed/24049323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.116380 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Manikandan, Arjunan Sarkar, Biplab Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur King, Paul R. Sresty, N.V. Madhusudhana Holla, Ragavendra Kotur, Sachin Nadendla, Sujatha Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants |
title | Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants |
title_full | Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants |
title_fullStr | Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants |
title_short | Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants |
title_sort | role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24049323 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.116380 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manikandanarjunan roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants AT sarkarbiplab roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants AT rajendranvivekthirupathur roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants AT kingpaulr roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants AT srestynvmadhusudhana roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants AT hollaragavendra roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants AT kotursachin roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants AT nadendlasujatha roleofstepsizeandmaxdwelltimeinanatomybasedinverseoptimizationforprostateimplants |