Cargando…

Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women

INTRODUCTION: Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in eligible pregnant women is a key intervention for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. However, in many settings in sub-Saharan Africa where ART-eligibility is determined by CD4 cell counts, limited access to lab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myer, Landon, Daskilewicz, Kristen, McIntyre, James, Bekker, Linda-Gail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044627
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.16.1.18649
_version_ 1782477469852368896
author Myer, Landon
Daskilewicz, Kristen
McIntyre, James
Bekker, Linda-Gail
author_facet Myer, Landon
Daskilewicz, Kristen
McIntyre, James
Bekker, Linda-Gail
author_sort Myer, Landon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in eligible pregnant women is a key intervention for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. However, in many settings in sub-Saharan Africa where ART-eligibility is determined by CD4 cell counts, limited access to laboratories presents a significant barrier to rapid ART initiation. Point-of-care (POC) CD4 cell count testing has been suggested as one approach to overcome this challenge, but there are few data on the agreement between POC CD4 cell enumeration and standard laboratory-based testing. METHODS: Working in a large antenatal clinic in Cape Town, South Africa, we compared POC CD4 cell enumeration (using the Alere Pima(TM) Analyzer) to laboratory-based flow cytometry in consecutive HIV-positive pregnant women. Bland–Altman methods were used to compare the two methods, including analyses by subgroups of participant gestational age. RESULTS: Among the 521 women participating, the median gestational age was 23 weeks, and the median CD4 cell count according to POC and laboratory-based methods was 388 and 402 cells/µL, respectively. On average, the Pima POC test underestimated CD4 cell count relative to flow cytometry: the mean difference (laboratory test minus Pima POC) was 22.7 cells/µL (95% CI, 16.1 to 29.2), and the limits of agreement were −129.2 to 174.6 cells/µL. When analysed by gestational age categories, there was a trend towards increasing differences between laboratory and POC testing with increasing gestational age; in women more than 36 weeks’ gestation, the mean difference was 45.0 cells/µL (p=0.04). DISCUSSION: These data suggest reasonable overall agreement between Pima POC CD4 testing and laboratory-based flow cytometry among HIV-positive pregnant women. The finding for decreasing agreement with increasing gestational age requires further investigation, as does the operational role of POC CD4 testing to increase access to ART within PMTCT programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3776301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37763012013-09-18 Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women Myer, Landon Daskilewicz, Kristen McIntyre, James Bekker, Linda-Gail J Int AIDS Soc Short Report INTRODUCTION: Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in eligible pregnant women is a key intervention for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. However, in many settings in sub-Saharan Africa where ART-eligibility is determined by CD4 cell counts, limited access to laboratories presents a significant barrier to rapid ART initiation. Point-of-care (POC) CD4 cell count testing has been suggested as one approach to overcome this challenge, but there are few data on the agreement between POC CD4 cell enumeration and standard laboratory-based testing. METHODS: Working in a large antenatal clinic in Cape Town, South Africa, we compared POC CD4 cell enumeration (using the Alere Pima(TM) Analyzer) to laboratory-based flow cytometry in consecutive HIV-positive pregnant women. Bland–Altman methods were used to compare the two methods, including analyses by subgroups of participant gestational age. RESULTS: Among the 521 women participating, the median gestational age was 23 weeks, and the median CD4 cell count according to POC and laboratory-based methods was 388 and 402 cells/µL, respectively. On average, the Pima POC test underestimated CD4 cell count relative to flow cytometry: the mean difference (laboratory test minus Pima POC) was 22.7 cells/µL (95% CI, 16.1 to 29.2), and the limits of agreement were −129.2 to 174.6 cells/µL. When analysed by gestational age categories, there was a trend towards increasing differences between laboratory and POC testing with increasing gestational age; in women more than 36 weeks’ gestation, the mean difference was 45.0 cells/µL (p=0.04). DISCUSSION: These data suggest reasonable overall agreement between Pima POC CD4 testing and laboratory-based flow cytometry among HIV-positive pregnant women. The finding for decreasing agreement with increasing gestational age requires further investigation, as does the operational role of POC CD4 testing to increase access to ART within PMTCT programmes. International AIDS Society 2013-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3776301/ /pubmed/24044627 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.16.1.18649 Text en © 2013 Myer L et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Myer, Landon
Daskilewicz, Kristen
McIntyre, James
Bekker, Linda-Gail
Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women
title Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women
title_full Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women
title_fullStr Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women
title_short Comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based CD4 cell enumeration in HIV-positive pregnant women
title_sort comparison of point-of-care versus laboratory-based cd4 cell enumeration in hiv-positive pregnant women
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3776301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24044627
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.16.1.18649
work_keys_str_mv AT myerlandon comparisonofpointofcareversuslaboratorybasedcd4cellenumerationinhivpositivepregnantwomen
AT daskilewiczkristen comparisonofpointofcareversuslaboratorybasedcd4cellenumerationinhivpositivepregnantwomen
AT mcintyrejames comparisonofpointofcareversuslaboratorybasedcd4cellenumerationinhivpositivepregnantwomen
AT bekkerlindagail comparisonofpointofcareversuslaboratorybasedcd4cellenumerationinhivpositivepregnantwomen